Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Radiation Exposure of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) in the Course of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) including dual energy and reconstruction of iodine maps for diagnosing CTEPH. This method for detecting embolisms and perfusion failures was compared with V/Q-SPECT. An additional purpose was to compare the applied radiation dose of both techniques.

Materials and Methods 71 patients (49 women) with suspected CTEPH were included in this prospective study. The patients received a V/Q-SPECT and a dual-energy CTPA. Iodine maps were reconstructed from the data set. CTPA and the iodine maps were read by an experienced radiologist unaware of the clinical information as well as the results of the V/Q-SPECT. Results were compared to the V/Q-SPECT. DLP and the applied amount of radionuclides (MAA, Technegas) were obtained for comparison of radiation dose.

Results For the diagnosis of CTEPH, the sensitivity of DECT was 1.000, specificity 0.966, PPV 0.867 and NPV 1.000, respectively. There was not a considerable difference in the x-ray exposure between the DECT examination and the V/Q-SPECT (1.892 mSv vs. 1.911 mSv; p = 0.6115). Both examination modalities were highly consistent regarding the classification of pathological segments (1177/1278 segments, 92,09 %, κ = 0,5938).

Conclusion This study presents the DECT, in combination with reconstructed iodine maps, as a potential alternative to the current imaging technique of first choice, V/Q-SPECT. For creating future prospective diagnostic algorithms, the implementation of DECT screening with iodine maps should be considered.

Key Points:

• DECT correctly identified all CTEPH patients.

• There is substantial agreement between DECT and V/Q-SPECT in the classification of pathological segments.

• There is no significant difference in radiation exposure during DECT examination and V/Q-SPECT examination.

• Reduced radiation dose does not negatively impact image quality.

Citation Format

• Schüßler A, Richter M, Tello K et al. Evaluation der diagnostischen Genauigkeit und der Strahlendosis der Dual-Energy-Computertomografie (DECT) bei chronisch thromboembolischer pulmonaler Hypertonie (CTEPH). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 1318 – 1326

Key words

DECT - CTEPH - PBV - iodmap - pulmonary hypertension

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 06. November 2020

Angenommen: 12. April 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Juni 2021

• References

• 1 Delcroix M, Torbicki A, Gopalan D. et al. ERS Statement on Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Eur Respir J 2020;
• 2 Kim NH, Delcroix M, Jais X. et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801915
• 3 Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL. et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 67-119
• 4 Olsson KM, Meyer B, Hinrichs J. et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 2014; 111: 856-862
• 5 Xu S, Yang J, Zhu Y. et al. CTPA, DECT, MRI, V/Q Scan, and SPECT/CT V/Q for the noninvasive diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Medicine 2019; 98: e16787
• 6 Opitz C, Rosenkranz S, Ghofrani HA. et al. ESC-Leitlinie 2015: Diagnostik und Therapie der pulmonalen Hypertonie. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 2016; 141: 1764-1769
• 7 Hoeper MM, Ghofrani HA, Grünig E. et al. Pulmonary Hypertension. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 2017; 114: 73-84
• 8 Haramati A, Haramati LB. Imaging of Chronic Thromboembolic Disease. Lung 2020; 198: 245-255
• 9 Hwang HJ, Hoffman EA, Lee CH. et al. The role of dual-energy computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary function. European journal of radiology 2017; 86: 320-334
• 10 Dournes G, Verdier D, Montaudon M. et al. Dual-energy CT perfusion and angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: diagnostic accuracy and concordance with radionuclide scintigraphy. European radiology 2014; 24: 42-51
• 11 Schümichen C, Schmidt M, Krause T. DGN-Handlungsempfehlung (S1-Leitlinie) Lungenszintigraphie Stand 11/2017 – AWMF-Registernummer: 031-005. 2017
• 12 Kwiecien R, Kopp-Schneider A, Blettner M. Concordance analysis: part 16 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 2011; 108: 515-521
• 13 Hammann M, Jördens J, Schecker H. Methoden in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung: Übereinstimmung zwischen Beurteilern: Cohens Kappa (ĸ). Springer Verlag; 2014
• 14 Yandrapalli S, Tariq S, Kumar J. et al. Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Cardiology in review 2018; 26: 62-72
• 15 Elwing JM, Vaidya A, Auger WR. Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: An Update. Clinics in chest medicine 2018; 39: 605-620
• 16 Delcroix M, Kerr K, Fedullo P. Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2016; 13 (Suppl. 03) S201-S206
• 17 Kuznetsov MR, Reshetov IV, Orlov BB. et al. Predictors of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Kardiologiia 2018; 58: 60-65
• 18 Kröger JR, Gerhardt F, Dumitrescu D. et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension using spectral-detector CT. International journal of cardiology 2019; 285: 80-85
• 19 Masy M, Giordano J, Petyt G. et al. Dual-energy CT (DECT) lung perfusion in pulmonary hypertension: concordance rate with V/Q scintigraphy in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). European radiology 2018; 28: 5100-5110