Hybridkeramik für die Single-Visit-Restauration

Im klinischen Alltag fragen viele Patienten nach der Möglichkeit, indirekte Restaurationen aus einem zahnfarbenen Material und mit möglichst wenig Zeitaufwand herzustellen. Häufig kann in diesen Fällen die Single-Visit-Restauration in Erwägung gezogen werden. Für die Anfertigung einer Single-Visit-Restauration ist eine Vielfalt von Materialien verfügbar, die lediglich poliert werden müssen. Auch bei Hybridkeramiken ist kein Sintervorgang vorgesehen, wodurch sie zur Anfertigung einer Single-Visit-Restauration geeignet sind. Eine Übersicht über die Anwendung von Hybridkeramiken wird nachfolgend dargestellt.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. August 2021

• Literatur

• 1 Benic GI, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V. et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116 (05) 777-782
• 2 Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V. et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118 (01) 43-48
• 3 Rauch A, Häußler G, Hahnel S. Monolithische Restaurationen aus CAD/CAM-Silikatkeramiken. wissen kompakt 2019; 13 (03) 147-159
• 4 Rauch A, König A. Indirekte Komposite aus klinischer und werkstoffkundlicher Sicht. Quintessenz 2020; 71 (02) 116-126
• 5 Steinbrenner H. Multichromatic and highly translucent hybrid ceramic Vita Enamic. Int J Comput Dent 2018; 21 (03) 239-250
• 6 Facenda JC, Borba M, Corazza PH. A literature review on the new polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material (PICN). J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (04) 281-286
• 7 Dauti R, Cvikl B, Lilaj B. et al. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63 (01) 40-46
• 8 de Andrade GS, Augusto MG, Simoes BV. et al. Impact of simulated toothbrushing on surface properties of chairside CAD-CAM materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125 (03) 469.e1-469.e6
• 9 Nima G, Lugo-Varillas JG, Soto J. et al. Effect of toothbrushing on the surface of enamel, direct and indirect CAD/CAM restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2021;
• 10 Cruz MEM, Simões R, Martins SB. et al. Influence of simulated gastric juice on surface characteristics of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123 (03) 483-490
• 11 Munusamy SM, Yap AU, Ching HL. et al. Degradation of Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Composites by Dietary Solvents: An Optical Three-dimensional Surface Analysis. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (04) E176-E184
• 12 Barutcigil K, Dündar A, Batmaz SG. et al. Do resin-based composite CAD/CAM blocks release monomers?. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25 (01) 329-336
• 13 Putzeys E, Vercruyssen C, Duca RC. et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (10) 1275-1281
• 14 Castro EF, Azevedo VLB, Nima G. et al. Adhesion, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure of Resin-matrix CAD-CAM Ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2020; 22 (04) 421-431
• 15 Vita Zahnfabrik. VITA ENAMIC Verarbeitungsanleitung. Im Internet (Stand: 01.04.2020): https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/pdb_cc0c01,27568,85233.html
• 16 Takahashi N, Yabuki C, Kurokawa H. et al. Influence of surface treatment on bonding of resin luting cement to CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater J 2020; 39 (05) 834-843
• 17 El-Damanhoury HM, Nesrine AE, Sheela S. et al. Adhesive luting to hybrid ceramic and resin composite CAD/CAM Blocks:Er:YAG Laser versus chemical etching and micro-abrasion pretreatment. J Prosthodont Res 2020;
• 18 González-Serrano C, Phark JH, Fuentes MV. et al. Effect of a single-component ceramic conditioner on shear bond strength of precoated brackets to different CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25 (04) 1953-1965
• 19 Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Strub JR. et al. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (05) 1973-1983
• 20 Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Vach K. et al. Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network CAD/CAM Single Crowns: Three-Year Mid-Term Results of a Prospective Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont 2020; 33 (02) 160-168
• 21 Chirumamilla G, Goldstein CE, Lawson NC. A 2-year Retrospective Clinical study of Enamic Crowns Performed in a Private Practice Setting. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (04) 231-237
• 22 Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F. et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119 (03) 363-368
• 23 Zheng Z, He Y, Ruan W. et al. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2020;