Im klinischen Alltag fragen viele Patienten nach der Möglichkeit, indirekte Restaurationen aus einem zahnfarbenen Material und mit möglichst wenig Zeitaufwand herzustellen. Häufig kann in diesen Fällen die Single-Visit-Restauration in Erwägung gezogen werden. Für die Anfertigung einer Single-Visit-Restauration ist eine Vielfalt von Materialien verfügbar, die lediglich poliert werden müssen. Auch bei Hybridkeramiken ist kein Sintervorgang vorgesehen, wodurch sie zur Anfertigung einer Single-Visit-Restauration geeignet sind. Eine Übersicht über die Anwendung von Hybridkeramiken wird nachfolgend dargestellt.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Literatur
1
Benic GI,
Mühlemann S,
Fehmer V.
et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116 (05) 777-782
2
Sailer I,
Benic GI,
Fehmer V.
et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118 (01) 43-48
6
Facenda JC,
Borba M,
Corazza PH.
A literature review on the new polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material (PICN). J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (04) 281-286
7
Dauti R,
Cvikl B,
Lilaj B.
et al. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63 (01) 40-46
8
de Andrade GS,
Augusto MG,
Simoes BV.
et al. Impact of simulated toothbrushing on surface properties of chairside CAD-CAM materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125 (03) 469.e1-469.e6
9
Nima G,
Lugo-Varillas JG,
Soto J.
et al. Effect of toothbrushing on the surface of enamel, direct and indirect CAD/CAM restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2021;
10
Cruz MEM,
Simões R,
Martins SB.
et al. Influence of simulated gastric juice on surface characteristics of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123 (03) 483-490
13
Putzeys E,
Vercruyssen C,
Duca RC.
et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (10) 1275-1281
14
Castro EF,
Azevedo VLB,
Nima G.
et al. Adhesion, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure of Resin-matrix CAD-CAM Ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2020; 22 (04) 421-431
16
Takahashi N,
Yabuki C,
Kurokawa H.
et al. Influence of surface treatment on bonding of resin luting cement to CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater J 2020; 39 (05) 834-843
17
El-Damanhoury HM,
Nesrine AE,
Sheela S.
et al. Adhesive luting to hybrid ceramic and resin composite CAD/CAM Blocks:Er:YAG Laser versus chemical etching and micro-abrasion pretreatment. J Prosthodont Res 2020;
18
González-Serrano C,
Phark JH,
Fuentes MV.
et al. Effect of a single-component ceramic conditioner on shear bond strength of precoated brackets to different CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25 (04) 1953-1965
19
Spitznagel FA,
Scholz KJ,
Strub JR.
et al. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (05) 1973-1983
21
Chirumamilla G,
Goldstein CE,
Lawson NC.
A 2-year Retrospective Clinical study of Enamic Crowns Performed in a Private Practice Setting. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (04) 231-237
22
Lu T,
Peng L,
Xiong F.
et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119 (03) 363-368
23
Zheng Z,
He Y,
Ruan W.
et al. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2020;
