Hybridkeramik für die Single-Visit-Restauration

Martin Butz; Sebastian Hahnel; Angelika Rauch

doi:10.1055/a-1527-7018

ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt, Table of Contents

ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2021; 130(07/08): 346-350
DOI: 10.1055/a-1527-7018

Fortbildung

Hybridkeramik für die Single-Visit-Restauration

Authors

Martin Butz
Sebastian Hahnel
Angelika Rauch

Abstract

Im klinischen Alltag fragen viele Patienten nach der Möglichkeit, indirekte Restaurationen aus einem zahnfarbenen Material und mit möglichst wenig Zeitaufwand herzustellen. Häufig kann in diesen Fällen die Single-Visit-Restauration in Erwägung gezogen werden. Für die Anfertigung einer Single-Visit-Restauration ist eine Vielfalt von Materialien verfügbar, die lediglich poliert werden müssen. Auch bei Hybridkeramiken ist kein Sintervorgang vorgesehen, wodurch sie zur Anfertigung einer Single-Visit-Restauration geeignet sind. Eine Übersicht über die Anwendung von Hybridkeramiken wird nachfolgend dargestellt.

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Benic GI, Mühlemann S, Fehmer V. et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116 (05) 777-782
2 Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V. et al. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118 (01) 43-48
3 Rauch A, Häußler G, Hahnel S. Monolithische Restaurationen aus CAD/CAM-Silikatkeramiken. wissen kompakt 2019; 13 (03) 147-159
4 Rauch A, König A. Indirekte Komposite aus klinischer und werkstoffkundlicher Sicht. Quintessenz 2020; 71 (02) 116-126
5 Steinbrenner H. Multichromatic and highly translucent hybrid ceramic Vita Enamic. Int J Comput Dent 2018; 21 (03) 239-250
6 Facenda JC, Borba M, Corazza PH. A literature review on the new polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material (PICN). J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (04) 281-286
7 Dauti R, Cvikl B, Lilaj B. et al. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63 (01) 40-46
8 de Andrade GS, Augusto MG, Simoes BV. et al. Impact of simulated toothbrushing on surface properties of chairside CAD-CAM materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125 (03) 469.e1-469.e6
9 Nima G, Lugo-Varillas JG, Soto J. et al. Effect of toothbrushing on the surface of enamel, direct and indirect CAD/CAM restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2021;
10 Cruz MEM, Simões R, Martins SB. et al. Influence of simulated gastric juice on surface characteristics of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123 (03) 483-490
11 Munusamy SM, Yap AU, Ching HL. et al. Degradation of Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Composites by Dietary Solvents: An Optical Three-dimensional Surface Analysis. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (04) E176-E184
12 Barutcigil K, Dündar A, Batmaz SG. et al. Do resin-based composite CAD/CAM blocks release monomers?. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25 (01) 329-336
13 Putzeys E, Vercruyssen C, Duca RC. et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (10) 1275-1281
14 Castro EF, Azevedo VLB, Nima G. et al. Adhesion, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure of Resin-matrix CAD-CAM Ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2020; 22 (04) 421-431
15 Vita Zahnfabrik. VITA ENAMIC Verarbeitungsanleitung. Im Internet (Stand: 01.04.2020): https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/pdb_cc0c01,27568,85233.html
16 Takahashi N, Yabuki C, Kurokawa H. et al. Influence of surface treatment on bonding of resin luting cement to CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater J 2020; 39 (05) 834-843
17 El-Damanhoury HM, Nesrine AE, Sheela S. et al. Adhesive luting to hybrid ceramic and resin composite CAD/CAM Blocks:Er:YAG Laser versus chemical etching and micro-abrasion pretreatment. J Prosthodont Res 2020;
18 González-Serrano C, Phark JH, Fuentes MV. et al. Effect of a single-component ceramic conditioner on shear bond strength of precoated brackets to different CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25 (04) 1953-1965
19 Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Strub JR. et al. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (05) 1973-1983
20 Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Vach K. et al. Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network CAD/CAM Single Crowns: Three-Year Mid-Term Results of a Prospective Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont 2020; 33 (02) 160-168
21 Chirumamilla G, Goldstein CE, Lawson NC. A 2-year Retrospective Clinical study of Enamic Crowns Performed in a Private Practice Setting. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (04) 231-237
22 Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F. et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119 (03) 363-368
23 Zheng Z, He Y, Ruan W. et al. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2020;