PDF herunterladen
MSK – Muskuloskelettale Physiotherapie 2021; 25(04): 181-189
DOI: 10.1055/a-1539-2504
Originalarbeit

Wie sinnvoll ist die Zweipunktdiskrimination als diagnostisches Mittel bei der Epicondylopathia humeri radialis?

Fall-KontrollstudieHow Useful Is Two-Point Discrimination as a Diagnostic Tool for Epicondylopathia humeri radialis?A Case-Control Study
Kirsten Börms
1   Donau-Universität Krems, Dept. Gesundheitswissenschaften/Medizin/Forschung, Master of Science in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy OMT, Krems, Österreich
,
Michael Richter
2   Rückenzentrum Am Michel, Physiotherapie Am Michel, Hamburg
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die diagnostische Aussagekraft der Zweipunktdiskrimination (ZPD) als Indikator für chronische Krankheitsprozesse (z. B. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Low Back Pain) ist mehrfach untersucht und gilt als belegt. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, die ZPD als diagnostisches Mittel in der Ellenbogenregion zu untersuchen.

Mithilfe eines Ästhesiometers (Schieblehre) wurde die ZPD im Bereich des lateralen Ellenbogens bei einer Patientengruppe (N = 21) mit der Diagnose Epicondylopathia humeri radialis sowie einer gesunden Kontrollgruppe (N = 40) mit folgender primärer Fragestellung untersucht: Kann die ZPD am Ellenbogen gesunde Proband(inn)en von Proband(inn)en mit Epicondylopathia humeri radialis unterscheiden? Als Basis wurden ZPD-Normwerte anhand der Kontrollgruppe am lateralen Ellenbogen erstellt. In einer vertiefenden Datenanalyse der Patientenpopulation wurden die Daten der Patient(inn)en mit einem akuten (N = 13) mit den Daten der Patient(inn)en mit einem chronischen (N = 8) Zustand verglichen.

Im Ergebnis scheint die ZPD kein geeignetes Diagnostikinstrument zur Differenzierung der Fall- von der Kontrollgruppe sowie von akuten und chronischen Verläufen in der lateralen Ellenbogenregion zu sein.

Abstract

The diagnostic value of two-point discrimination (2PD) as an indicator of chronic disease processes (e. g. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Low Back Pain) has been the subject of several studies and is considered proven. The aim of the present paper was to study the value of 2PD as a diagnostic tool in the elbow region.

Using an esthesiometer (caliper), 2PD in the lateral elbow region was examined in a group of patients diagnosed with epicondylitis humeri radialis (n = 21) and a healthy control group (n = 40) with the following primary research question: Can 2PD in the elbow region distinguish healthy subjects from subjects with epicondylitis humeri radialis? As a basis, 2PD standard values at the lateral elbow were established using the control group. In-depth data analysis of the patient population compared data from patients with an acute (n = 13) and chronic (n = 8) condition.

In conclusion, 2PD does not seem to be a suitable diagnostic tool to differentiate the case group from the control group and acute from chronic conditions in the lateral elbow region.

Schlüsselwörter

Zweipunktdiskrimination - Epicondylopathia humeri radialis - kortikale Reorganisation - chronischer Schmerz - Neuroplastizität

Key words

two-point discrimination - epicondylopathia humeri radialis - cortical reorganization - chronic pain - neuroplasticity


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. Januar 2021

Angenommen: 14. Februar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Greiner S, Perka C, Thiele K. Epikondylitis – Ätiologie, Diagnostik und therapeutische Optionen. OP-JOURNAL 2012; 28: 72-80
    Thieme ConnectSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Fernández-Carnero J, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, de la Llave-Rincón AI. et al. Widespread mechanical pain hypersensitivity as sign of central sensitization in unilateral epicondylalgia: a blinded, controlled study. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 555-561
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Waugh EJ, Jaglal SB, Davis AM. Computer use associated with poor long-term prognosis of conservatively managed lateral epicondylalgia. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34: 770-780
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H. et al. Prevalence and Determinants of Lateral and Medial Epicondylitis: A Population Study. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 164: 1065-1074
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Smidt N, Assendelft WJJ, van der Windt DAWM. et al. Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Pain 2002; 96: 23-40
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Moseley GL, Zalucki NM, Wiech K. Tactile discrimination, but not tactile stimulation alone, reduces chronic limb pain. Pain 2008; 137: 600-608
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Moseley GL, Wiech K. The effect of tactile discrimination training is enhanced when patients watch the reflected image of their unaffected limb during training. Pain 2009; 144: 314-319
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Lotze M, Moseley GL. Role of distorted body image in pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2007; 9: 488-496
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Catley MJ, O’Connell NE, Berryman C. et al. Is tactile acuity altered. in people with chronic pain? a systematic review and meta-analysis J Pain 2014; 15: 985-1000
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 IASP Announces Revised Definition of Pain – IASP (16.07.2020). https://bit.ly/3ea3Vr7 Stand: 10.01.2021
  • 11 Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M. et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020; 161: 1976-1982
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Van den Berg F. Angewandte Physiologie. Band 4: Schmerzen verstehen und beeinflussen. 2. Aufl.. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme Verlag; 2008
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Egan Moog M. Skript Schmerzphysiologie 2015. Donau-Universität Krems; 2015
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Egan-Moog M. Praxis orientiertes Schmerzmanagement. Physikalische Therapie in Theorie und Praxsi 2008; 29: 436-458
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 2000; 85: 317-332
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Butler D, Moseley L. eds. Explain Pain. 2013. 2nd. ed.. Adelaide: Noigroup Publications; 2013
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Flor H. Cortical reorganisation and chronic pain: implications for rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2003; 41 Suppl: 66-72
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Flor H, Braun C, Elbert T. et al. Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients. Neurosci Lett 1997; 224: 5-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ploner M, Schnitzler A. Kortikale Repräsentation von Schmerz. Der Nervenarzt 2004; 75: 962-969
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Maihöfner C, Nickel FT, Seifert F. Neuropathische Schmerzsyndrome und Neuroplastizität in der funktionellen Bildgebung. Der Schmerz 2010; 24: 137-145
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ramachandran VS, Stewart M, Rogers-Ramachandran DC. Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Neuroreport 1992; 3: 583-586
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Pleger B, Ragert P, Schwenkreis P. et al. Patterns of cortical reorganization parallel impaired tactile discrimination and pain intensity in complex regional pain syndrome. NeuroImage 2006; 32: 503-510
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Botnmark I, Tumilty S, Mani R. Tactile acuity, body schema integrity and physical performance of the shoulder: A cross-sectional study. Man Ther 2016; 23: 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Falling C, Mani R. Regional asymmetry, obesity and gender determines tactile acuity of the knee regions: A cross-sectional study. Man Ther 2016; 26: 150-157
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Louw A, Puentedura E, Schmidt S. et al. Integrating Manual Therapy and Pain Neuroscience: Twelve principles for treating the body and the brain. Minneapolis: Orthopedic Physical Therapy Products; 2019
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Neubauer E, Junge A, Pirron P. et al. HKF-R 10 – screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Pain Lond Engl 2006; 10: 559-566
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Catley MJ, Tabor A, Wand BM. et al. Assessing tactile acuity in rheumatology and musculoskeletal medicine – how reliable are two-point discrimination tests at the neck, hand, back and foot?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52: 1454-1461
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ariga A, Lleras A. Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: Deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition 2011; 118: 439-443
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Luomajoki H, Moseley GL. Tactile acuity and lumbopelvic motor control in patients with back pain and healthy controls. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 437-440
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sterling M, Treleaven J, Edwards S. et al. Pressure Pain Thresholds in Chronic Whiplash Associated Disorder: Further Evidence of Altered Central Pain Processing. J Musculoskelet Pain 2002; 10: 69-81
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 920-926
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. et al. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1038-1046
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Su Y. QuickDASH. J Physiother 2014; 60: 167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A. et al. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) and Its Shortened Version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 30-39
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of Sensibility after Nerve Injury and Repair: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of Tests. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30: 252-264
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Craig JC. Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. Somatosens Mot Res 1999; 16: 197-206
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Tong J, Mao O, Goldreich D. Two-Point Orientation Discrimination Versus the Traditional Two-Point Test for Tactile Spatial Acuity Assessment. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 579
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Moseley GL, Flor H. Targeting cortical representations in the treatment of chronic pain: a review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 646-652
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Cashin AG, McAuley JH. Measuring two-point discrimination threshold with a caliper. J Physiother 2017; 63: 186
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Ehrenbrusthoff K, Ryan CG, Grueneberg C. et al. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of a novel protocol for two-point discrimination in individuals with chronic low back pain. Physiotherapy 2016; 102: e15
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar