Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82(03): 317-325
DOI: 10.1055/a-1608-1138
GebFra Science
Original Article

Inadequate Timing Limits the Benefit of Antenatal Corticosteroids on Neonatal Outcome: Retrospective Analysis of a High-Risk Cohort of Preterm Infants in a Tertiary Center in Germany

Schlechtes Timing reduziert den Nutzen von antenatalen Kortikosteroiden für das neonatale Outcome: eine retrospektive Analyse einer Hochrisikogruppe von Frühgeborenen in einem deutschen Perinatalzentrum Level 1
Richard Biedermann
1   University Hospital Jena, Unit Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Jena, Germany
,
Ekkehard Schleussner
2   University Hospital Jena, Department of Obstetrics, Jena, Germany
,
Angela Lauten
2   University Hospital Jena, Department of Obstetrics, Jena, Germany
,
Yvonne Heimann
2   University Hospital Jena, Department of Obstetrics, Jena, Germany
,
Thomas Lehmann
3   University Hospital Jena, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computer Science, Jena, Germany
,
Hans Proquitté
1   University Hospital Jena, Unit Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Jena, Germany
,
Friederike Weschenfelder
2   University Hospital Jena, Department of Obstetrics, Jena, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction A common problem in the treatment of threatened preterm birth is the timing and the unrestricted use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS). This study was performed to evaluate the independent effects of the distinct timing of antenatal corticosteroids on neonatal outcome parameters in a cohort of very low (VLBW; 1000 – 1500 g) and extreme low birth weight infants (ELBW; < 1000 g). We hypothesize that a prolonged ACS-to-delivery interval leads to an increase in respiratory complications.

Materials and Methods Main data source was the prospectively collected single center data for the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (KISS) between 2015 and 2018. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine independent effects of the ACS-to-delivery interval on the need for ventilation, surfactant or the occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis. Subgroup analysis was performed for ELBW and VLBW neonates.

Results A total of 239 neonates were included. We demonstrate a significantly increased risk of respiratory distress characterized by the need for ventilation (OR 1.045; CI 1.011 – 1.080) and surfactant administration (OR 1.050, CI 1.018 – 1.083) depending on the ACS-to-delivery interval irrespective of other confounders. Every additional day between ACS and delivery increased the risk for ventilation by 4.5% and for surfactant administration by 5%. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences of respiratory complications in VLBW infants.

Conclusions Our data strongly support the deliberate use and timing of antenatal corticosteroids in pregnancies with threatened preterm birth versus a liberal strategy. When given more than 7 days before birth, each day between application and delivery increases is relevant concerning major effects on the infant. Especially VLBW preterm neonates benefit from optimal timing.

Zusammenfassung

Introduction Die uneingeschränkte Gabe von antenatalen Kortikosteroiden (ACS) und der Zeitpunkt dieser Gabe stellen ein verbreitetes Problem in der Behandlung drohender Frühgeburten dar. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die unabhängige Wirkung pränataler Gaben von Kortikosteroiden zu unterschiedlichen Zeitpunkten auf die neonatalen Outcome-Parameter in einer Gruppe von Neugeborenen mit sehr niedrigem (very-low-birthweight, VLBW; 1000 – 1500 g) bzw. extrem niedrigem Geburtsgewicht (extremely-low-birthweight, ELBW; < 1000 g) zu evaluieren. Wir stellten die Hypothese auf, dass ein langer Intervall zwischen ACS-Gabe und Geburt zu einem Ansteig der Atemwegskomplikationen führt.

Material und Methoden Die Hauptdatenquelle waren prospektive monozentrische Daten, die für das deutsche Überwachungssystem für nosokomiale Infektionen (KISS) in einem einzigen Zentrum zwischen 2015 und 2018 gesammelt wurden. Es wurde eine multivariate Regressionsanalyse durchgeführt, um die unabhängige Wirkung des Intervalls zwischen ACS-Gabe und Geburt auf den Bedarf nach künstlicher Beatmung bzw. einer Surfactant-Therapie sowie das Auftreten einer bronchopulmonalen Dysplasie, einer neonatalen Sepsis oder einer nekrotisierenden Enterokolitis zu bestimmen. Es wurden Untergruppenanalysen für die Gruppen der ELBW- und der VLBW-Neugeborenen durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse Insgesamt wurden 239 Neugeborenen in die Studie aufgenommen. Wir fanden ein signifikant höheres Risiko für ein Atemnotsyndrom, das durch die Notwendigkeit einer mechanischen Beatmung (OR 1,045; KI 1,011 – 1,080) bzw. einer Surfactant-Gabe (OR 1,050, KI 1,018 – 1,083) gekennzeichnet war. Ungeachtet anderer Störfaktoren hing das Risiko von der Dauer des Intervalls zwischen ACS-Gabe und Geburt ab. Jeder zusätzliche Tag zwischen ACS-Gabe und Geburt erhöhte das Risiko für eine mechanische Beatmung um 4,5% und für eine Surfactant-Therapie um 5%. Die Untergruppenanalyse zeigte signifikante Unterschiede in den Atemwegskomplikationen bei VLBW-Neugeborenen.

Schlussfolgerungen Unsere Daten unterstreichen die Bedeutung, die ein bewusster Einsatz und das richtigen Timing von ACS-Gaben bei Schwangerschaften mit drohender Frühgeburt anstatt einer liberalen Strategie hat. Wenn die ACS-Gabe mehr als 7 Tage vor der Geburt erfolgt, kann jeder zusätzliche Tag zwischen ACS-Gabe und Geburt wichtige Auswirkungen auf das Neugeborene haben. Besonders VLBW-Frühgeborene profitieren von einem optimalen Timing.

Key words

antenatal corticosteroids - preterm birth - VLWB - perinatal outcome - respiratory distress syndrome

Schlüsselwörter

antenatale Kortikosteroide - Frühgeburt - VLWB - perinatales Outcome - Atemnotsyndrom des Frühgeborenen


Publication History

Received: 03 May 2021

Accepted after revision: 22 August 2021

Article published online:
03 March 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Stavropoulou D, Hentschel R. [Antenatal Steroid Therapy in Threatened Premature Birth – State of the Art]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2017; 221: 265-271
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Schleussner E. The prevention, diagnosis and treatment of premature labor. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110: 227-235 quiz 236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N. et al. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (03) CD004454
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Jobe AH, Soll RF. Choice and dose of corticosteroid for antenatal treatments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 878-881
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 322-335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Travers CP, Carlo WA, McDonald SA. et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Mortality and pulmonary outcomes of extremely preterm infants exposed to antenatal corticosteroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 130.e1-130.e13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ballard PL, Ballard RA. Scientific basis and therapeutic regimens for use of antenatal glucocorticoids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 254-262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Bolt RJ, van Weissenbruch MM, Lafeber HN. et al. Glucocorticoids and lung development in the fetus and preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001; 32: 76-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 [Anonym] Effect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes. NIH Consensus Development Panel on the Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes. JAMA 1995; 273: 413-418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lau HCQ, Tung JSZ, Wong TTC. et al. Timing of antenatal steroids exposure and its effects on neonates. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Crowther CA, McKinlay CJ, Middleton P. et al. Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for improving neonatal health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015 (07) CD003935
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Vidaeff AC, Ramin SM, Gilstrap 3rd LC. et al. Characterization of corticosteroid redosing in an in vitro cell line model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1403-1408
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Vermillion ST, Soper DE, Newman RB. Is betamethasone effective longer than 7 days after treatment?. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 491-493
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ring AM, Garland JS, Stafeil BR. et al. The effect of a prolonged time interval between antenatal corticosteroid administration and delivery on outcomes in preterm neonates: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 457.e1-e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Sehdev HM, Abbasi S, Robertson P. et al. The effects of the time interval from antenatal corticosteroid exposure to delivery on neonatal outcome of very low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1409-1413
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Peaceman AM, Bajaj K, Kumar P. et al. The interval between a single course of antenatal steroids and delivery and its association with neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1165-1169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 van Baaren GJ, Vis JY, Wilms FF. et al. Predictive value of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in threatened preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1185-1192
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 McPheeters ML, Miller WC, Hartmann KE. et al. The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1325-1329 discussion 1329–1330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Levin HI, Ananth CV, Benjamin-Boamah C. et al. Clinical indication and timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration at a single centre. BJOG 2016; 123: 409-414
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Razaz N, Skoll A, Fahey J. et al. Trends in optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 288-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatrics 2013; 13: 59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Walsh MC, Yao Q, Gettner P. et al. Impact of a physiologic definition on bronchopulmonary dysplasia rates. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1305-1311
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Leistner R, Piening B, Gastmeier P. et al. Nosocomial Infections in Very Low Birthweight Infants in Germany: Current Data from the National Surveillance System NEO-KISS. Klin Padiatr 2013; 225: 75-80
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Sarquis AL, Miyaki M, Cat MN. [The use of CRIB score for predicting neonatal mortality risk]. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2002; 78: 225-229
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E. et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1373-1379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hušková M, Meintanis SG. Omnibus tests for the error distribution in the linear regression model. Statistics 2007; 41: 363-376
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Carreno CA, Refuerzo JS, Holland MG. et al. The Frequency of Prior Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy in Late Preterm Birth Pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 767-772
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Boßung V, Rody A. Eine Frage des Timings: Retrospektive 10-Jahres-Analyse zur RDS-Prophylaxe bei Frühgeburten vor 34 + 0 SSW. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78: 238
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Langhammer K, Roth B, Kribs A. et al. Treatment and outcome data of very low birth weight infants treated with less invasive surfactant administration in comparison to intubation and mechanical ventilation in the clinical setting of a cross-sectional observational multicenter study. Eur J Pediatr 2018; 177: 1207-1217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hartel C, Paul P, Hanke K. et al. Less invasive surfactant administration and complications of preterm birth. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 8333
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Deshmukh M, Patole S. Antenatal corticosteroids for neonates born before 25 Weeks-A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0176090
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ. et al. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 198-206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Torrance HL, Derks JB, Scherjon SA. et al. Is antenatal steroid treatment effective in preterm IUGR fetuses?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 1068-1073
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Morrison JL, Botting KJ, Soo PS. et al. Antenatal steroids and the IUGR fetus: are exposure and physiological effects on the lung and cardiovascular system the same as in normally grown fetuses?. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012: 839656
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Onland W, de Laat MW, Mol BW. et al. Effects of antenatal corticosteroids given prior to 26 weeksʼ gestation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 33-44
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar