PDF herunterladen
OP-Journal 2022; 38(02): 104-110
DOI: 10.1055/a-1656-5623
Fachwissen

Robotik – was geht in der Chirurgie?

Robotics – Whatʼs Hot and New in Surgery?
Karl H. Hillebrandt
,
Moritz Schmelzle
,
Igor M. Sauer
,
Johann Pratschke
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die roboterassistierte Chirurgie hat sich in den letzten Jahren deutlich weiterentwickelt und wurde in immer mehr Teilbereichen der Chirurgie als fester Bestandteil des operativen Spektrums implementiert. Dieser Beitrag legt den aktuellen Stand der roboterassistierten Chirurgie in Bereichen der Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Literatur dar.

Abstract

In the last years robot-assisted surgery has significantly developed. Moreover, robot-assisted surgery has been implemented in many sub-specialties as a big part of the surgical spectrum. This article will highlight the current state of robot-assisted surgery in the fields of general, visceral and thoracic surgery considering the available literature.

Schlüsselwörter

roboterassistierte Chirurgie - Viszeralchirurgie - Thoraxchirurgie

Key words

robot-assisted surgery - visceral surgery - thoracic surgery


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Februar 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Gosrisirikul C, Chang KD, Raheem AA. et al. New era of robotic surgical systems. Asian J Endosc Surg 2018; 11: 291-299
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A. et al. Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care. JSLS 2018; 22: e2018.00039
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Intuitive | Robotic Assisted Surgical Company. About Us. Im Internet (Stand: 25.08.2021): https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/about-us/company
    PubMed
  • 4 Melfi FMA, Menconi GF, Mariani AM. et al. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2002; 21: 864-868
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Möller T, Egberts J-H, Eichhorn M. et al. Current status and evolution of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in Germany-results from a nationwide survey. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11: 4807-4815
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Aiolfi A, Nosotti M, Micheletto G. et al. Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic approach. Surgery 2021; 169: 436-446
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ma J, Li X, Zhao S. et al. Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy or segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2021; 21: 498
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rückert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M. et al. Minimal-invasive Chirurgie des Thymus. Chirurg 2007; 79: 18-25
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rückert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M. et al. Thoracoscopic thymectomy with the da Vinci robotic system for myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1132: 329-335
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Friedant AJ, Handorf EA, Su S. et al. Minimally Invasive versus Open Thymectomy for Thymic Malignancies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 30-38
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Buentzel J, Heinz J, Hinterthaner M. et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy: The current evidence. Int J Med Robot 2017;
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kastner C, Reibetanz J, Germer C-T. et al. Evidenz in der minimal-invasiven onkologischen Chirurgie des Kolons und des Rektums. Chirurg 2020; 92: 334-343
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten e.V. (DGVS). S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom. Langversion 2.1. – Januar 2019, AWMF-Registernummer: 021/007OL. Im Internet (Stand: 09.09.2021): https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/021-007OLl_S3_Kolorektales-Karzinom-KRK_2019-01.pdf
    PubMed
  • 14 Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ. et al. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 589-595
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Brown CSB. et al. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 596-602
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H. et al. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 318: 1569-1580
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Qiu H, Yu D, Ye S. et al. Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020; 80: 225-230
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Tang B, Lei X, Ai J. et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19: 38
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Phan K, Kahlaee HR, Kim SH. et al. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23: 221-230
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Gavriilidis P, Wheeler J, Spinelli A. et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers: has a paradigm change occurred? A systematic review by updated meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22: 1506-1517
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kowalewski KF, Seifert L, Ali S. et al. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 81-95
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Benhidjeb T, Witzel K, Schulte am Esch J. et al. History and Evolution of Transoral Thyroidectomy Approach. Transoral Neck Surg 2020;
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Xing Z, Qiu Y, Abuduwaili M. et al. Surgical outcomes of different approaches in robotic assisted thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2021; 89: 105941
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Pan J-H, Zhou H, Zhao X-X. et al. Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3985-4001
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie e.V. (DGAV). S2 k-Leitlinie: Operative Therapie von Nebennierentumoren. AWMF-Registernummer: 088-008. Im Internet (Stand: 09.09.2021): https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/088-008.html
    PubMed
  • 26 Heger P, Probst P, Hüttner FJ. et al. Evaluation of Open and Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. World J Surg 2017; 41: 2746-2757
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Economopoulos KP, Mylonas KS, Stamou AA. et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 38: 95-104
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Marino MV, di Saverio S, Podda M. et al. The Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging During Robotic Liver Resection: A Case-Matched Study. World J Surg 2019; 43: 2595-2606
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W. et al. [Possibilities and limits of robotic liver surgery – Current status 2020]. Chirurg 2021; 92: 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Ziogas IA, Giannis D, Esagian SM. et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 524-535
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Khachfe HH, Habib JR, Harthi SA. et al. Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials. J Robot Surg 2021;
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL. et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surgery 2020; 271: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Di Martino M, Caruso R, DʼOvidio A. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis on costs and perioperative outcome. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17: e2295
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 van der Sluis PC, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E. et al. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience). J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Ma J, Li X, Zhao S. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18: 306
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Ojima T, Nakamura M, Hayata K. et al. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy vs. Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156: 954-963
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Li K, Zou J, Tang J. et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 3031-3044
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Aiolfi A, Tornese S, Bonitta G. et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15: 985-994
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Feußner H, Ostler D, Wilhelm D. Robotik und “augmented reality”. Chirurg 2018; 89: 760-768
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Shademan A, Decker RS, Opfermann JD. et al. Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery. Sci Transl Med 2016; 8: 337ra64
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar