Download PDF
neuroreha 2021; 13(04): 181-185
DOI: 10.1055/a-1660-4052
Aus der Praxis

Wie halten wir unser Fachwissen aktuell?

Befragung von medizinischem Personal zur Aktualisierung des berufsbezogenen Wissens
Caroline Stumm
,
Margret Hund-Georgiadis
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Der Informationsfluss in der Medizin wächst ebenso rasant wie Erkenntnisse aus neuesten wissenschaftlichen Publikationen. Neben den klassischen Informationsquellen stehen elektronische Ressourcen zur Verfügung, die allerorts schnellen Zugriff auf neuestes Wissen erlauben. Offen bleiben folgende Fragen: Wie bringen Fachleute aus Gesundheitsprofessionen sich auf den neuesten Wissensstand? Wie gelangt relevantes Wissen in die Praxis? Die vorliegende Befragung untersucht, welche Informationsquellen medizinische Fachpersonen hauptsächlich nutzen, um sich auf dem aktuellen Forschungsstand zu halten.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015; 66: 2215-2222
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hurst D, Mickan S. Describing knowledge encounters in healthcare: A mixed studies systematic review and development of a classification. Implementation Science 2017; 12: 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Davies K, Harrison J. The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: A review of the evidence. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2007; 24: 78-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Spenceley SM, O’Leary KA, Chizawsky LLK. et al. Sources of information used by nurses to inform practice: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2008; 45: 954-970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kloda LA, Bartlett JC. Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: A review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2009; 97: 194-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Clarke MA, Belden JL, Koopman RJ. et al. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: A literature review. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2013; 30: 178-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Weng Y, Kuo KN, Yang C. et al. Information-searching behaviors of main and allied health professionals: a nationwide survey in Taiwan. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2013; 19: 902-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schüppel J. Wissensmanagement. Organisatorisches Lernen. 2. Aufl.. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: A systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 71: 9-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jette DU, Bacon K, Batty C. et al. Evidence-based practice: Beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Physical Therapy 2003; 83: 786-805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Alper BS, Hand JA, Elliott SG. et al. How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care?. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2004; 92: 429-437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Maggio LA, Aakre CA, Del Fiol G. et al. Impact of clinicians’ use of electronic knowledge resources on clinical and learning outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019; 21: e13315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Coumou HCH, Meijman FJ. How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2006; 94: 55-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2010; 27: 2-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bernard E, Arnould M, Saint-Lary O. et al. Internet use for information seeking in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey among French general practitioners. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012; 81: 493-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Isaac T, Zheng J, Jha A. Use of UpToDate and outcomes in US hospitals. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2012; 7: 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shimizu T, Nemoto T, Tokuda Y. Effectiveness of a clinical knowledge support system for reducing diagnostic errors in outpatient care in Japan: A retrospective study. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2018; 109: 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hancock NJ, Collins K, Dorer C. et al. Evidence-based practice ‘on-the-go’: Using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open Quality 2019; 8: e000592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Vollmar HC, Ostermann T, Hinz A. et al. Hausärzte, Internet und Fortbildungsmedien. Nutzung und Effizienzeinschätzung durch Allgemeinärzte und hausärztlich tätige Internisten im 6-Jahres-Vergleich. Medizinische Klinik 2008; 103: 425-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Vollmar HC, Rieger MA, Butzlaff ME. et al. General Practitioners’ preferences and use of educational media: A German perspective. BMC Health Services Research 2009; 9: 31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rappolt S, Tassone M. How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2002; 22: 170-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142: 260-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar