Therapeutic Strategies in 103 Children with Congenital Microphthalmos

Abstract

Introduction Congenital microphthalmos can either occur alone (simple microphthalmos) or be associated with other ocular malformations, such as sclerocornea or cataract (complex microphthalmos). As this is a rare condition, there are no uniform recommendations for treatment.

Material and Methods Retrospective case series of 103 patients or a total of 114 eyes with congenital microphthalmos, with reporting of age, sex, visual acuity, pupil reaction, axial length, horizontal width of the palpebral fissure, type of therapy performed and complications.

Results All patients would have been able to be fitted with a prosthesis primarily. The size of the palpebral fissure depended on the underlying findings: “bilateral microphthalmos” < “microphthalmos and healthy fellow eye” < “microphthalmos and fellow anophthalmos”. In order to assess visual (residual) function in an infant in the first weeks or months of life, the pupillary response is of the upmost importance in deciding on therapy, especially in unilateral disease, and as assessed with the indirect light response of the healthy eye. In about half of the cases, conservative prosthetic treatment was sufficient. After the successful initial fitting of a prosthesis, the prosthesis was enlarged according to the ocularistʼs instructions. If the eye length difference was so large that symmetry could not be achieved even with a double-walled prosthesis, volume filling with retrobulbar implanted self-swelling pellet expanders (osmed GmbH, Ilmenau) was offered. In almost one third of the patients, no surgical therapy or prosthetic treatment was performed. The reason for this was usually the presence of minimal visual function of the microphthalmos – ranging from light perception to hand movements.

Conclusions In the case of visual function of the microphthalmos, surgical measures should not be indicated or only with extreme caution, since the preservation of the existing visual acuity must be regarded as having priority over the cosmetic findings. In cases of asymmetry or underdeveloped palpebral fissure, therapy can be started early in the first year of life without fear of resulting complications.

Key words

paediatric ophthalmology - plastic surgery - microphthalmos - prosthesis - expander

Publication History

Received: 11 September 2021

Accepted: 19 November 2021

Article published online:
04 February 2022

• Literatur/References

• 1 Duke-Elder S. Anophthalmos and extreme Microphthalmos. In: Duke-Elder S. ed. System of Ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby; 1964: 416-429
• 2 Warburg M. Classification of microphthalmos and coloboma. J Med Genet 1993; 30: 664-669
• 3 Verma AS, Fitzpatrick DR. Anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 47
• 4 Tucker S, Jones B, Collin R. Systemic anomalies in 77 patients with congenital anophthalmos or microphthalmos. Eye (Lond) 1996; 10: 310-314
• 5 Schittkowski MP, Guthoff RF. Systemic and ophthalmological anomalies in congenital anophthalmic or microphthalmic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 487-493
• 6 Stallings EB, Isenburg JL, Mai CT. et al. Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2011–2015: A focus on eye and ear defects. Birth Defects Res 2018; 110: 1478-1486
• 7 Changal N, Khandekar RB. Eye Conformers as Socket Expanders in Children: Experience at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Central Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2021; 13: e13465
• 8 Ohuchi H, Sato K, Habuta M. et al. Congenital eye anomalies: More mosaic than thought?. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2019; 59: 56-73
• 9 Gerth-Kahlert C, Williamson K, Ansari M. et al. Clinical and mutation analysis of 51 probands with anophthalmia and/or severe microphthalmia from a single center. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2013; 1: 15-31
• 10 McLean CJ, Ragge NK, Jones RB. et al. The management of orbital cysts associated with congenital microphthalmos and anophthalmos. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 860-863
• 11 Martius P, Tech S, Stachs O. et al. [Transpalpebral measurement of axial eye length. Use of contact B-scan sonography]. Ophthalmologe 2010; 107: 733-739
• 12 Schittkowski MP, Guthoff RF. Injectable self inflating hydrogel pellet expanders for the treatment of orbital volume deficiency in congenital microphthalmos: preliminary results with a new therapeutic approach. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 1173-1177
• 13 Schittkowski MP. [Therapy options for blind microphthalmos and clinical anophthalmos]. Ophthalmologe 2012; 109: 1122-1126
• 14 Quaranta-Leoni FM, Sposato S, Raglione P. et al. Dermis-Fat Graft in Children as Primary and Secondary Orbital Implant. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 32: 214-219
• 15 Ragge NK, Subak-Sharpe ID, Collin JR. A practical guide to the management of anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Eye (Lond) 2007; 21: 1290-1300
• 16 Collin JR, Moriarty PA. Management of the contracted socket. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1982; 102: 93-97
• 17 Downes R, Lavin M, Collin R. Hydrophilic expanders for the congenital anophthalmic socket. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 9: 57-61
• 18 Modugno AC, Resti AG, Mazzone G. et al. Long-term outcomes after cosmetic customized prostheses and dermis fat graft in congenital anophthalmia: a retrospective multicentre study. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32: 1803-1810
• 19 Tucker SM, Sapp N, Collin R. Orbital expansion of the congenitally anophthalmic socket. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 667-671
• 20 Gundlach KK, Guthoff RF, Hingst VH. et al. Expansion of the socket and orbit for congenital clinical anophthalmia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 1214-1222
• 21 Quaranta-Leoni FM. Congenital anophthalmia: current concepts in management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22: 380-384
• 22 Heher KL, Katowitz JA, Low JE. Unilateral dermis-fat graft implantation in the pediatric orbit. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 14: 81-88
• 23 Küstner M, Riebeling P, Podmelle F. et al. [Volume overload from hydrogel expander after treatment for enophthalmos]. Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 1126-1129