Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2021; 130(12): 617-627
DOI: 10.1055/a-1686-5432
Fortbildung

Gussklammerverankerte Teilprothesen – ein kleines Repetitorium

Klaus Böning
1   Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Zahnmedizinische Propädeutik und experimentelle Zahnmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
,
Theresa Volk
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie DMS V fordert, „geeignete zahnmedizinische Konzepte für die Lebensphase einer (…) zunehmenden Gebrechlichkeit bereitzuhalten“ [1]. Die gussklammerverankerte Teilprothese vereinigt minimale Invasivität mit Kosteneffizienz und hoher Funktionalität [2] [3] [4] [5]. Sie scheint im Kontext der DMS V das geeignete Therapiemittel. Dieses kleine Repetitorium greift noch einmal einzelne Aspekte des Designs gussklammerverankerter Teilprothesen auf.

Publication History

Article published online:
04 January 2022

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Jordan RA, Bodechtel C, Hertrampf K. et al. Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (DMS V). Köln: Deutscher Zahnärzte Verlag DÄV; 2016
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Behr M, Zeman F, Passauer T. et al. Clinical performance of cast clasp-retained removable partial dentures: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 138-144
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson C-O. A 25 year longitudinal study of patients treated with removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P. et al. Treatment Outcomes with Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective Analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 147-150
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 De Siqueira GP, Dos Santos MBF, Dos Santos JFF. et al. Patients’ expectation and satisfaction with removable dental prosthesis therapy and correlation with patients’ evaluation of the dentists. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 210-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Beaumont AJ. An overview of esthetics with removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 747-755
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Osada H, Shimpo H, Hayakawa T. et al. Influence of thickness and undercut of thermoplastic resin clasps on retentive force. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Şakar O. Removable Partial Dentures. A Practitioners’ Manual. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Carreiro A da FP, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET. et al. Dual Path: A Concept to Improve the Esthetic Replacement of Missing Anterior Teeth with a Removable Partial Denture. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 586-590
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Garcia L, Bohnenkamp D. The use of a rotational-path design for a mandibular removable partial denture. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2004; 25: 552-567
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Krol AJ, Jacobson TE, Finzen FC. Removable partial Denture Design Outline Syllabus. 5. San Rafael, California: Indent; 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Carr AB, Mcgivney GP, Brown DT. McCracken’s removable partial Prosthodontics. 11. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2005
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Davenport JC, Basker RM, Heath JR. A Colour Atlas of removable partial Denture. London, England: Wolfe Medical Puplications Ltd; 1988
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Campbell LD. Subjective reactions to major connector designs for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 507-516
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hansen CA, Campbell DJ. Clinical comparison of two mandibular major connector designs: The sublingual bar and the lingual plate. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54: 805-809
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 LaVere AM, Krol AJ. Selection of a major connector for the extension-base removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 102-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ao A, Wakabayashi N, Nitta H. et al. Clinical and Microbiologic Effects of Lingual Cervical Coverage by Removable Partial Dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Christou P, Kiliaridis S. Three-dimensional changes in the position of unopposed molars in adults. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 543-549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Craddock HL, Youngson CC. A study of the incidence of overeruption and occlusal interferences in unopposed posterior teeth. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 341-348
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lenz P, Reitz J. Untersuchungen zur verkürzten Zahnreihe. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1986; 41: 8-10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar