Herausforderung prothetische Rehabilitation bei Patienten mit Mundtrockenheit

Mundtrockenheit ist eine weitverbreitete Erkrankung der Mundhöhle und betrifft etwa jeden 5. Erwachsenen. Vor allem bei älteren Patienten nimmt ihre Prävalenz aufgrund von Polymorbidität und -pharmazie zu. Während die subjektiv empfundene Mundtrockenheit (Xerostomie) eine deutliche Einschränkung der Lebensqualität bedeuten kann, stellt die objektive Abwesenheit von Speichel (Hyposalivation) vor allem für die zahnärztliche Behandlung eine Herausforderung dar. Anhand eines exemplarischen Fallbeispiels soll eine Option der prothetischen Rehabilitation aufgezeigt werden und als Orientierung für eine mögliche Behandlung dienen.

Schlüsselwörter

Gerostomatologie - Hyposalivation - Mundtrockenheit - prothetische Rehabilitation - Xerostomie

Publication History

Article published online:
04 January 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Bardow A, Nyvad B, Nauntofte B. Relationships between medication intake, complaints of dry mouth, salivary flow rate and composition, and the rate of tooth demineralization in situ. Arch Oral Biol 2001; 46: 413-423
• 2 Murray Thomson W, Chalmers JM, John Spencer A. et al. A longitudinal study of medication exposure and xerostomia among older people. Gerodontology 2006; 23: 205-213
• 3 Scully C. Drug effects on salivary glands: dry mouth. Oral Dis 2003; 9: 165-176
• 4 Nederfors T, Isaksson R, Mornstad H. et al. Prevalence of perceived symptoms of dry mouth in an adult Swedish population--relation to age, sex and pharmacotherapy. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 211-216
• 5 Agostini BA, Cericato GO, Silveira ERD. et al. How Common is Dry Mouth? Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of Prevalence Estimates. Braz Dent J 2018; 29: 606-618
• 6 Pina GMS, Mota Carvalho R, Silva BSF. et al. Prevalence of hyposalivation in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerodontology 2020; 37: 317-331
• 7 Hahnel S, Schwarz S, Zeman F. et al. Prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation and their association with quality of life in elderly patients in dependence on dental status and prosthetic rehabilitation: a pilot study. J Dent 2014; 42: 664-670
• 8 Herrmann G, Muller K, Behr M. et al. Xerostomia and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2017; 50: 145-150
• 9 Niklander S, Veas L, Barrera C. et al. Risk factors, hyposalivation and impact of xerostomia on oral health-related quality of life. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31: e14
• 10 Ahmad MS, Bhayat A, Zafar MS. et al. The Impact of Hyposalivation on Quality of Life (QoL) and Oral Health in the Aging Population of Al Madinah Al Munawarrah. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14: 445
• 11 Stolze J, Boor M, Hazenberg MD. et al. Oral health-related quality of life of patients with oral chronic graft-versus-host disease. Support Care Cancer 2021;
• 12 Almeida D, Vianna K, Arriaga P. et al. Dental implants in Sjogren’s syndrome patients: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0189507
• 13 Strietzel FP, Schmidt-Westhausen AM, Neumann K. et al. Implants in patients with oral manifestations of autoimmune or muco-cutaneous diseases – A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019; 24: e217-e230
• 14 Chatzistavrianou D, Shahdad S. Implant Treatment in Patients with Sjogren’s Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Two Clinical Case Reports. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016; 24: 40-46
• 15 Ergun S, Katz J, Cifter ED. et al. Implant-supported oral rehabilitation of a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: case report and review of the literature. Quintessence Int 2016; 41: 863-867
• 16 Reissmann DR, Wolfart S, John MT. et al. Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years – A randomized controlled trial. J Dent 2019; 80: 55-62
• 17 van de Rijt LJM, Stoop CC, Weijenberg RAF. et al. The Influence of Oral Health Factors on the Quality of Life in Older People: A Systematic Review. Gerontologist 2020; 60: e378-e394
• 18 Hahnel S. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2018