Quality assurance in colonoscopy: is case mix a problem?

• References

• 1 Boyle P, Autier P, Bartelink H. et al. European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003). Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 973-1005
• 2 Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G. et al. The Norwegian Gastronet project: continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres. Scand J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 481-487
• 3 Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Available at (Accessed 23.10.2021): www.thejag.org.uk
• 4 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
• 5 Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 172-180
• 6 Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M. et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 378-397
• 7 Nass KJ, van der Vlugt M, Elfrink AKE. Case-mix adjustment to compare colonoscopy performance between endoscopy centers: a nationwide registry study. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 455-462
• 8 Holme Ø, Pedersen IB, Medhus AW. et al. Endoscopy assistants influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 871-877
• 9 Jensen CD, Doubeni CA, Quinn VP. et al. Adjusting for patient demographics has minimal effects on rates of adenoma detection in a large, community-based setting. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 739-746
• 10 Hoff G, Botteri E, Høie O. et al. Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E195-E202