Phlebologie, Table of Contents Phlebologie 2022; 51(02): 69DOI: 10.1055/a-1723-6739 Leserbrief Leserbrief zum Beitrag: Recrossektomie und Barrier-Implantation Jörg Fuchs Recommend Article Abstract Letter to: Recrossektomie und Barrier-ImplantationPhlebologie 2021; 50(06): 390-394DOI: 10.1055/a-1586-0408 Letter to: Antwort zum Leserbrief: Recrossektomie und Barrier-Implantation Phlebologie 2022; 51(02): 70-71DOI: 10.1055/a-1734-9700 Full Text References Literatur 1 Wolff EM, Mühlberger D, Hummel T. et al. Recrossektomie und Barrier-Implantation. Phlebologie 2021; 50: 390-394 2 Heim D, Negri M, Schlegel U. et al. Resecting the great saphenous stump with endothelial inversion decreases neither neovascularization nor thigh varicosity recurrence. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 1028-1032 3 De Maeseneer MG, Vandenbroeck CP, Van Schil PE. Silicone patch saphenoplasty to prevent repeat recurrence after surgery to treat recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence: Long-term follow-up study. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 98-105 4 De Maeseneer MG, Vandenbroeck CP, Lauwers PR. et al. Early and late complications of silicone patch saphenoplasty at the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 1285-1290 5 De Maeseneer MG, Philipsen TE, Vandenbroeck CP. et al. Closure of the Cribriform Fascia: An Efficient Anatomical Barrier Against Postoperative Neovascularisation at the Saphenofemoral Junction? A Prospective Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 361-366