Praxis Handreha, Table of Contents Praxis Handreha 2022; 03(03): 122-128DOI: 10.1055/a-1733-3997 Schwerpunkt | Vertiefung Anwendung und Evaluierung der Schienenbehandlung bei der Dupuytren‘schen Kontraktur Sonja Elisabeth Pelzmann Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Ob Literatur oder klinische Praxis: Die Schienenbehandlung bei der Dupuytren‘schen Kontraktur nach Fasziektomie ist vielfältig und individuell. Wie Handtherapeut*innen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz diese handhaben, zeigen die Ergebnisse dieser Online-Umfrage. Full Text References Literatur 1 Pelzmann SE. Methods and outcomes of hand therapy in Dupuytren’s disease. A scoping review Master Thesis. Wien, Österreich: FH Campus Wien; 2015 2 Pelzmann SE. Schienenbehandlung bei der Dupuytren’schen Kontraktur. Promanu 2021; 8-11 3 Benson LS, Williams CS, Kahle M. et al. Dupuytren’s contracture. J Am Acad Othopaedic Surg 1998; 6: 24-35 4 Townley WA, Baker R, Sheppard N. et al. Dupuytren’s contracture unfolded. BMJ 2006; 332: 397-400 5 Engstrand C, Borén L, Liedberg GM. Evaluation of activity limitation and digital extension in Dupuytren’s contracture three months after fasciectomy and hand therapy interventions. J Hand Ther 2009; 22: 21-26 quiz 27 6 Samargandi OA, Alyouha S, Larouche P. et al. Night orthosis after surgical correction of Dupuytren contractures: A systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 839.e1-839.e10 7 Henry M. Dupuytren’s disease: Current state of the art. Hand 2014; 9: 1-8 8 Engstrand C, Krevers B, Nylander G. et al. Hand function and quality of life before and after fasciectomy for Dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 1333-1343.e2 9 Pratt AL, Ball C. What are we measuring: A critique of range of motion methods currently in use for Dupuytren’s disease and recommendations for practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016: 1–11. 10.1186/s12891-016-0884-3 10 Poelstra R, van Kooij YE, van der Oest MJW. et al. Patient’s satisfaction beyond hand function in Dupuytren’s disease: Analysis of 1106 patients. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 280-285 11 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-608 12 Rodrigues JN, Zhang W, Scammell B. et al. Validity of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41: 589-599 13 Forget NJ, Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L. et al. Psychometric evaluation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) with Dupuytren’s contracture: Validity evidence using Rasch modeling. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 1-12 14 Beaudreuil J, Allard A, Zerkak D. et al. Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (uram) scale: Development and validation of a tool to assess Dupuytren’s disease-specific disability. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 1448-1455 15 Mohan A, Vadher J, Ismail H. et al. The Southampton Dupuytren’s scoring scheme. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48: 28-33
