Download PDF
Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie up2date 2022; 16(03): 225-240
DOI: 10.1055/a-1739-8361
Bariatrische und metabolische Chirurgie

Der Stellenwert neuerer Verfahren in der Adipositaschirurgie (SADI, SASI und Co.)

Daniel Gärtner
,
Axel Schöttler
,
Anna Popp
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Die Adipositaschirurgie bietet die effektivste Therapieoption für die Adipositas und ihre Nebenerkrankungen. Von Beginn an unterlag diese Chirurgie einem steten Wandel. Durch Modifikationen etablierter OP-Methoden wollen die neueren Verfahren die Invasivität und die unerwünschten Wirkungen reduzieren. Der folgende Beitrag zeigt, inwieweit dies gelingt und welche Verfahren das Potenzial zum Standardverfahren haben.
Kernaussagen

  • Die SADI ist im Gegensatz zum Original BPD-DS als Primärverfahren durchführbar, scheint jedoch aufgrund der gastrointestinalen Nebenwirkungen vor allem im Stufenkonzept und als Sekundäreingriff nach SG an Bedeutung zu gewinnen.

  • Von den neueren Verfahren sind der MGB-OAGB und die SADI bisher am besten in der Adipositaschirurgie etabliert. Vor allem die Bedeutung des MGB-OAGB nimmt als Primär- wie auch als Sekundäroperation nach SG weiter zu.

  • Die SASI bietet im Vergleich dazu Vorteile aufgrund der postoperativen endoskopischen Zugänglichkeit des Duodenums und besserer Ergebnisse in Bezug auf GERD, hat jedoch auch Nachteile wie den Gallereflux in Magen und Ösophagus. Ob sich langfristig die SASI als Ein-Anastomosen-Variante und/oder die TB als Roux-Y-Variante durchsetzen wird, kann heute angesichts der bislang nur kurzfristigen Ergebnisse noch nicht beurteilt werden.

  • Bei der IT handelt es sich vor allem um ein experimentelles Verfahren, das am Tiermodell sehr gute Einblicke in Stoffwechselveränderungen gibt. Beim Menschen liegen noch zu wenige Daten vor und diese meist in Kombination mit einer SG.

  • Die laparoskopische GP wird sich höchstwahrscheinlich aufgrund eines im Vergleich zum SG nicht so günstigen Komplikations-Nutzen-Verhältnisses nicht durchsetzen.

Schlüsselwörter

Adipositaschirurgie - SADI - SASI - Transit Bipartition - Gastric Plication


Publication History

Article published online:
16 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Boido A, Ceriani V, Cetta F. et al. Bariatric surgery and prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in morbid obesity: Mechanisms of action and choice of surgery. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2015; 25: 437-443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E. et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (08) CD003641
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Rubino F, Marescaux J. Effect of Duodenal-Jejunal Exclusion in a Non-obese Animal Model of Type 2 Diabetes: A New Perspective for an Old Disease. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P. et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 3783-3794
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA. et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1614-1618
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gagner M. Hypoabsorption Not Malabsorption, Hypoabsorptive Surgery and Not Malabsorptive Surgery. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 2783-2784
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sessa L, Guidone C, Gallucci P. et al. Effect of single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy on glucose tolerance test: comparison with other bariatric procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15: 1091-1097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R. et al. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Switch (SADIS): A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 104-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM. et al. The Effectiveness of Single-Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS): an Updated Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 1790-1800
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Yashkov Y, Bordan N, Torres A. et al. SADI-S250 vs. Roux-en-Y Duodenal Switch (RY-DS): Results of 5-Year Observational Study. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 570-579
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cottam A, Cottam D, Zaveri H. et al. An Analysis of Mid-Term Complications, Weight Loss, and Type 2 Diabetes Resolution of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus-Sparing Surgery (SIPS) Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with Three-Year Follow-Up. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 2894-2902
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Nelson L, Moon RC, Teixeira AF. et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch Procedure: Preliminary Result From a Single Institution. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig (São Paulo) 2016; 29 (Suppl. 01) 80-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D. et al. A Multi-institutional Study on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass as a Surgical Revision Option After Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 3165-3173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Santoro S, Malzoni CE, Velhote MCP. et al. Digestive adaptation with intestinal reserve: A neuroendocrine-based operation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1371-1379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Mui WLM, Lee DWH, Lam KKY. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop bipartition: A novel metabolic operation in treating obese type II diabetes mellitus. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5: 56-58
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Chambers AP, Sandoval DA, Seeley RJ. Integration of satiety signals by the central nervous system. Curr Biol 2013; 23: R379-R388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Bardaro SJ, Gagner M, Consten E. et al. Routine cholecystectomy during laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is not necessary. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007; 3: 549-553
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hess DS. Limb Measurements in Duodenal Switch. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 966
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Mahdy T, Emile SH, Madyan A. et al. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass for Patients with Morbid Obesity: a Multicenter Study. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 837-845
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Topart P, Becouarn G, Finel JB. Is transit bipartition a better alternative to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for superobesity? Comparison of the early results of both procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16: 497-502
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Reiser M, Christogianni V, Nehls F. et al. Short-term Results of Transit Bipartition to Promote Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Ann Surg Open 2021; 2: e102
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Widjaja J, Sun X, Chu Y. et al. Sleeve Gastrectomy with Braun Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (B-TB): a Potential Midway Between Single Anastomosis and Roux-en-Y Transit Bipartition. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 5500-5503
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg 2001; 11: 276-280
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G. et al. Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 1188-1206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Jia D, Tan H, Faramand A. et al. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 1211-1218
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kermansaravi M, Shahmiri SS, DavarpanahJazi AH. et al. One Anastomosis/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) as Revisional Surgery Following Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 370-383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E. et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: Short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg 2012; 22: 697-703
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Liagre A, Debs T, Kassir R. et al. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm: Weight Loss, Nutritional Outcomes, Endoscopic Results, and Quality of Life at 8-Year Follow-Up. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 4206-4217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Augène E, Kassir R. Reply to: We Should Now Study Biliopancreatic Limb of 100 cm with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 879-880
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Khalaj A, Kalantar Motamedi MA, Mousapour P. et al. Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Requiring Revisional Surgery after One-Anastomosis-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Case Series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS). Obes Surg 2019; 29: 1714-1720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Spiller RC, Trotman IF, Higgins BE. et al. The ileal brake – inhibition of jejunal motility after ileal fat perfusion in man. Gut 1984; 25: 365-374
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Oh TJ, Ahn CH, Cho YM. Contribution of the distal small intestine to metabolic improvement after bariatric/metabolic surgery: Lessons from ileal transposition surgery. J Diabetes Investig 2016; 7: 94-101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Somogyi E, Sigalet D, Adrian TE. et al. Ileal Transposition in Rats Reduces Energy Intake, Body Weight, and Body Fat Most Efficaciously When Ingesting a High-Protein Diet. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 2729-2742
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Somogyi E, Hoornenborg CW, Bruggink JE. et al. Ileal transposition: A non-restrictive bariatric surgical procedure that reduces body fat and increases ingestion-related energy expenditure. Physiol Behav 2020; 219: 112844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Mason EE. Ilial transposition and enteroglucagon/GLP-1 in obesity (and diabetic?) Surgery. Obes Surg 1999; 9: 223-228
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Ahn CH, Choi EH, Oh TJ. et al. Ileal Transposition Increases Pancreatic β Cell Mass and Decreases β Cell Senescence in Diet-Induced Obese Rats. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 1849-1858
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Chen W, Yin H, Zhang N. et al. Improvement of Postprandial Lipid Metabolism After Ileal Transposition in Non-obese Diabetic Rats. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 1572-1578
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 de Paula AL, Macedo ALV, Prudente AS. et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with ileal interposition (“neuroendocrine brake”)-pilot study of a new operation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2006; 2: 464-467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Cohen R, Caravatto PP, Petry TZ. Innovative metabolic operations. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016; 12: 1247-1255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Celik A, Cagiltay E, Ugale S. et al. Diverted sleeve gastrectomy with ileal transposition in overweight, obese, and morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of 1-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016; 12: 541-549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Celik A, Ugale S, Ofluoglu H. et al. Technical feasibility and safety profile of laparoscopic diverted sleeve gastrectomy with ileal transposition (DSIT). Obes Surg 2015; 25: 1184-1190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Perivoliotis K, Sioka E, Katsogridaki G. et al. Laparoscopic Gastric Plication versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Obes 2018; 2018: 3617458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Meyer HHG, Riauka R, Dambrauskas Z. et al. The effect of surgical gastric plication on obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochirurgia I Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2021; 16: 10-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Suarez DF, Gangemi A. How Bad Is “Bad”? A Cost Consideration and Review of Laparoscopic Gastric Plication Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 307-316
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar