Die Wirbelsäule, Table of Contents Die Wirbelsäule 2022; 06(03): 144-145DOI: 10.1055/a-1745-3722 Referiert und kommentiert Kommentar zu: Lumbale Spinalkanalstenose: Endoskopische versus minimal invasive Dekompression Frank Hassel 1 Orthopädische Chirurgie, Loretto-Krankenhaus Freiburg, Freiburg i.Br., Germany › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Comment on: Lumbale Spinalkanalstenose: Endoskopische versus minimal invasive DekompressionDie Wirbelsäule 2022; 06(03): 144-144DOI: 10.1055/a-1870-4841 Full Text References Literatur 1 Perez-Roman RJ, Gaztanaga W, Lu VM. et al. Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36: 549-557 2 Heo DH, Quillo-Olvera J, Park CK. Can Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Surgery Achieve Enough Canal Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis? Prospective Case-Control Study. World Neurosurg 2018; 120: e684-e689 3 Heo DH, Lee DC, Park CK. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 46: E9 4 Pairuchvej S, Muljadi JA, Ho JC. et al. Full-endoscopic (bi-portal or uni-portal9 versus microscopic lumbar decompression laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020; 30: 595-611 5 Saravi B, Lang G, Uelkuemen S. et al. Interlaminar vs microsurgical decompression of lumbar stenosis: a single center experience. Bone and Joint Journal 2021; 00: 00-00