Die Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie aus der Sicht ambulanter Krebspatienten

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Diese Studie untersucht aktuelle Bedürfnisse und Belastungen von ambulanten Krebspatienten im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie.

Material und Methoden Zwischen 11/2020 und 02/2021 wurden 122 ambulante Krebspatientinnen und -patienten des Comprehensive Cancer Center München in die Studie eingeschlossen und anhand eines standardisierten, halbstrukturierten Interviews zu Wissensstand und Informationsbedürfnissen in Bezug auf COVID-19, Risikowahrnehmung und Sorgen hinsichtlich der ambulanten Krebsbehandlung, COVID-19-spezifischen Belastungen sowie zum Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem und der Impfbereitschaft befragt. Zusätzlich wurde psychosozialer Distress anhand des Distress-Thermometers (DT) erhoben.

Ergebnisse Über ein Drittel der Krebspatienten (34,2 %, n = 41/120) hatte noch Informationsbedarf hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen des Coronavirus auf ihre Erkrankung oder Behandlung. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) waren von Veränderungen der laufenden oder geplanten Krebstherapie betroffen. Bei n = 42/121 (34,7 %) der Patienten zeigte sich ein erhöhter psychosozialer Distress (DT ≥ 5). Die häufigste Corona-spezifische Belastung war die Angst vor einer Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems (77,9 %, n = 95/122), gefolgt von der Befürchtung, dass sich Angehörige noch größere Sorgen um die betroffenen Patienten machen (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) der Patienten sind bereit, sich impfen zu lassen; 60 % (n = 18/30) der zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung Unentschlossenen oder Ablehner wünschen sich vor einer endgültigen Entscheidung für die Impfung ein Informationsgespräch mit ihrem Onkologen/ihrer Onkologin.

Schlussfolgerung Corona-spezifische Belastungen von Krebspatienten betreffen insbesondere den Verlauf der Therapie, aber auch eine mögliche Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems. Onkologische Behandler-Teams sollten Fragen ihrer Patienten Raum geben, mögliche Unsicherheiten anerkennen, emotionale Unterstützung leisten und auf valide Informationsquellen aufmerksam machen.

Abstract

Background This study investigates current needs and psychosocial burden of out-patients with cancer during the COVID-19-Pandemic.

Material and Methods Between 11/2020 and 02/2021 122 cancer patients who underwent out-patient treatment at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich participated in the study. Based on a standardized, semi-structured interview, participants were asked about their knowledge and informational needs related to COVID-19, risk perception and concerns regarding continuing out-patient treatment, COVID-19 related distress, confidence in the national health system, and their readiness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, patients filled out the distress thermometer (DT).

Results More than a third of the patients (34,2 %, n = 41/120) wanted to receive more information about the effects of the coronavirus on their cancer and their treatment. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) had faced changes concerning their current or planned treatment. 42/121 (34,7 %) of the patients were clinically distressed (DT ≥ 5). A possible overload of the health care system was the most commonly reported COVID-related concern (77,9 %, n = 95/122), followed by being concerned that their family members might be additionally worried about them (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) of the patients are willing to be vaccinated; 60 % (n = 18/30) of those undecided or refusing at the time of the survey expressed a desire to have a consultation with an oncologist before giving their final consent to vaccination.

Discussion Corona-specific distress of cancer patients relates in particular to the course of therapy, but also to a possible overload of the health care system. Oncology care teams should allow space for questions from their patients, acknowledge possible uncertainties, provide emotional support, and draw attention to reliable sources of information.

Schlüsselwörter

Krebs - COVID-19 - Pandemie - Distress - Psychosoziale Bedürfnisse

Key words

cancer - COVID-19 - pandemic - distress - psychosocial needs

^* Geteilte Erstautorenschaft

⁺ Geteilte Letztautorenschaft

Publication History

Article published online:
11 May 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020; 395: 912-920 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8.
• 2 Wang Y, Kala MP, Jafar TH. Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0244630 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244630.
• 3 Peters A, Rospleszcz S, Greiser KH. et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Reported Health. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117: 861-867 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0861.
• 4 Li S, Wang Y, Xue J. et al. The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 2032 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062032.
• 5 Mehnert A, Hartung TJ, Friedrich M. et al. One in two cancer patients is significantly distressed: Prevalence and indicators of distress. Psychooncology 2018; 27: 75-82 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4464.
• 6 Pichler T, Dinkel A, Marten-Mittag B. et al. Factors associated with the decline of psychological support in hospitalized patients with cancer. Psychooncology 2019; 28: 2049-2059 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5191.
• 7 Dai M, Liu D, Liu M. et al. Patients with Cancer Appear More Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Cancer Discov 2020; 10: 783-791 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0422.
• 8 Liang W, Guan W, Chen R. et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21: 335-337 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30096-6.
• 9 Venkatesulu BP, Chandrasekar VT, Girdhar P. et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cancer Patients Affected by a Novel Coronavirus. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5: pkaa102 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa102.
• 10 Papautsky EL, Hamlish T. Patient-reported treatment delays in breast cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184: 249-254 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05828-7.
• 11 Fröhling S, Arndt V. Versorgung von Krebspatienten: Corona-Effekt in der Onkologie. Dtsch Arztebl 2020; 117: A2234-A2242
• 12 Dinkel A, Goerling U, Honig K. et al. Psychooncological care for patients with cancer during 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: Views and experiences of senior psychooncologists at German Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Psychooncology 2021; 30: 1982-1985 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5759.
• 13 Bauerle A, Musche V, Schmidt K. et al. Mental Health Burden of German Cancer Patients before and after the Outbreak of COVID-19: Predictors of Mental Health Impairment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 2318 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052318.
• 14 Wang Y, Duan Z, Ma Z. et al. Epidemiology of mental health problems among patients with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic. Transl Psychiatry 2020; 10: 263 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-00950-y.
• 15 Musche V, Bauerle A, Steinbach J. et al. COVID-19-Related Fear and Health-Related Safety Behavior in Oncological Patients. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 1984 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01984.
• 16 Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C. et al. Die deutsche Version des NCCN Distress-Thermometers. Empirische Prüfung eines Screening-Instruments zur Erfassung psychosozialer Belastung bei Krebspatienten. ZPPP 2006; 54: 213-223 DOI: 10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213.
• 17 IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0.. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp;
• 18 MAXQDA, Software für qualitative Datenanalyse, 1989–2021, VERBI Software. Consult. Sozialforschung GmbH, Berlin, Deutschland.
• 19 Kuckartz U. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (3., überarbeitete Auflage). Grundlagentexte Methoden. In: Weinheim Basel: Beltz Juventa; 2016
• 20 Büntzel J, Walter S, Hellmund H. et al. Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die Versorgung von HNO-Tumoren – die Patientenperspektive. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2021; 100: 104-110 DOI: 10.1055/a-1327-4234.
• 21 Zarocostas J. How to fight an infodemic. Lancet 2020; 395: 676-676 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
• 22 Gallotti R, Valle F, Castaldo N. et al. Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to COVID-19 epidemics. Nat Hum Behav 2020; 4: 1285-1293 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00994-6.
• 23 Shao CC, Ciampaglia GL, Varol O. et al. The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 1-9 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
• 24 Smith GD, Blastland M, Munafò M. COVID-19’s known unknowns. BMJ 2020; DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3979.
• 25 Bhopal R, Munro APS. Scholarly communications harmed by covid-19. BMJ 2021; 372: n742 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n742.
• 26 Cobain M. COVID-19's known unknowns: population shared decision making. BMJ 2020; 371: m4514 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4514.
• 27 Hajek A, De Bock F, Kretzler B. et al. Factors associated with postponed health checkups during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Public Health 2021; 194: 36-41 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.023.
• 28 Sharot T. The optimism bias. Curr Biol 2011; 21: R941-R945 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030.
• 29 Felgendreff L, Korn L, Sprengholz P. et al. Risk information alone is not sufficient to reduce optimistic bias. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 17: 1026-1027 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.010.
• 30 Knebel C, Ertl M, Lenze U. et al. COVID-19-related cancellation of elective orthopaedic surgery caused increased pain and psychosocial distress levels. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29: 2379-2385 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06529-4.
• 31 Gharzai LA, Resnicow K, An LC. et al. Perspectives on Oncology-Specific Language During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic – A Qualitative Study. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6: 1424-1428 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2980.