Endoscopy 2022; 54(10): 993-998
DOI: 10.1055/a-1748-8573
Innovations and brief communications

Endoscopic intermuscular dissection for deep submucosal invasive cancer in the rectum: a new endoscopic approach

Leon M. G. Moons*
 1   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Barbara A. J. Bastiaansen*
 2   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Milan C. Richir
 3   Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Wouter L. Hazen
 4   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Elizabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
,
Jurriaan Tuynman
 5   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Sjoerd G. Elias
 6   Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Ruud W M. Schrauwen
 7   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
,
Frank P. Vleggaar
 1   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
 2   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Philip Bos
 8   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
,
Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta
 9   Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Miangela Lacle
10   Department of Pathology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Roel Hompes
 5   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Paul Didden
 1   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background The risk of lymph node metastasis associated with deep submucosal invasion should be balanced against the mortality and morbidity of total mesorectal excision (TME). Dissection through the submucosa hinders radical deep resection, and full-thickness resection may influence the outcome of completion TME. Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) in between the circular and longitudinal part of the muscularis propria could potentially provide an R0 resection while leaving the rectal wall intact.

Methods In this prospective cohort study, the data of patients treated with EID for suspected deep submucosal invasive rectal cancer between 2018 and 2020 were analyzed. Study outcomes were the percentages of technical success, R0 resection, curative resection, and adverse events.

Results 67 patients (median age 67 years; 73 % men) were included. The median lesion size was 25 mm (interquartile range 20–33 mm). The rates of overall technical success, R0 resection, and curative resection were 96 % (95 %CI 89 %–99 %), 81 % (95 %CI 70 %–89 %), and 45 % (95 %CI 33 %–57 %). Only minor adverse events occurred in eight patients (12 %).

Conclusion EID for deep invasive T1 rectal cancer appears to be feasible and safe, and the high R0 resection rate creates the potential of rectal preserving therapy in 45 % of patients.

* Contributed equally to this manuscript.


Figs. 1 s, 2 s



Publication History

Received: 12 January 2021

Accepted after revision: 24 January 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 January 2022

Article published online:
04 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Beaton C, Twine CP, Williams GL. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 788-797
  • 2 Yasue C, Chino A, Takamatsu M. et al. Pathological risk factors and predictive endoscopic factors for lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer: a single-center study of 846 lesions. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 708-717
  • 3 Ronnow CF, Arthursson V, Toth E. et al. Lymphovascular infiltration, not depth of invasion, is the critical risk factor of metastases in early colorectal cancer: retrospective population-based cohort study on prospectively collected data, including validation. Ann Surg 2022; 275: e148-e154
  • 4 Borstlap WA, Coeymans TJ, Tanis PJ. et al. Meta-analysis of oncological outcomes after local excision of pT1–2 rectal cancer requiring adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy or completion surgery. Br J Surg 2016; 103: 1105-1116
  • 5 van Oostendorp SE, Smits LJH, Vroom Y. et al. Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment. Br J Surg 2020; 107: 1719-1730
  • 6 Yamada M, Saito Y, Takamaru H. et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 233-242
  • 7 Watanabe D, Toyonaga T, Ooi M. et al. Clinical outcomes of deep invasive submucosal colorectal cancer after ESD. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 2123-2130
  • 8 Eid Y, Alves A, Lubrano J. et al. Does previous transanal excision for early rectal cancer impair surgical outcomes and pathologic findings of completion total mesorectal excision? Results of a systematic review of the literature. J Visc Surg 2018; 155: 445-452
  • 9 Hompes R, McDonald R, Buskens C. et al. Completion surgery following transanal endoscopic microsurgery: assessment of quality and short- and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: e576-e581
  • 10 Toyonaga T, Ohara Y, Baba S. et al. Peranal endoscopic myectomy (PAEM) for rectal lesions with severe fibrosis and exhibiting the muscle-retracting sign. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 813-817
  • 11 Backes Y, Schwartz MP, Ter Borg F. et al. Multicentre prospective evaluation of real-time optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps using narrow band imaging (the OPTICAL study). Gut 2019; 68: 271-279
  • 12 Spinelli A, Foppa C, Hompes R. Intermuscular Dissection: The New Frontier to Resect Early Neoplastic Rectal Lesions?. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64: 17-18
  • 13 Kuellmer A, Mueller J, Caca K. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1180-1189.e1
  • 14 Detering R, van Oostendorp SE, Meyer VM. et al. MRI cT1–2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study. Br J Surg 2020; 107: 1372-1382
  • 15 Ashraf S, Hompes R, Slater A. et al. A critical appraisal of endorectal ultrasound and transanal endoscopic microsurgery and decision-making in early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 821-826
  • 16 Zorcolo L, Fantola G, Cabras F. et al. Preoperative staging of patients with rectal tumors suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): comparison of endorectal ultrasound and histopathologic findings. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1384-1389
  • 17 Balyasnikova S, Brown G. The MRI assessment of SPECC (significant polyps and early colorectal cancer) lesions. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21 (Suppl. 01) 19-22
  • 18 Menahem B, Alves A, Morello R. et al. Should the rectal defect be closed following transanal local excision of rectal tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21: 929-936