Belastungsvorgaben nach distaler Femurfraktur - eine aktuelle Literaturübersicht

Zusammenfassung

Die Inzidenz der distalen Femurfraktur steigt gerade auch bei geriatrischen Patienten deutlich an. Grundsätzliches Ziel der Behandlung dieser Verletzung ist eine frühzeitige Mobilisation der Patienten zur Prävention immobilisationsassoziierter Begleiterkrankungen. Vor dem Hintergrund einer steigenden Anzahl an Therapieoptionen, wie der Doppelplattenosteosynthese, Nagel-Platte-Kombinationen sowie dem distalen Femurersatz, gewinnen Überlegungen zur möglichen Belastung nach der Versorgung einen neuen Stellenwert. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es daher, die bestehende Literatur der vergangenen 9 Jahre hinsichtlich Belastungsvorgaben und klinischer Ergebnisse der verschiedenen Therapieoptionen aufzuarbeiten und mit dem eigenen Vorgehen abzugleichen.

Schlüsselwörter

distale Femurfraktur - postoperative Belastungsvorgaben - Vollbelastung - Teilbelastung

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 12. September 2021

Angenommen nach Revision: 07. Februar 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. März 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 2006; 37: 691-697
• 2 Court-Brown CM, Biant L, Bugler KE. et al. Changing epidemiology of adult fractures in Scotland. Scott Med J 2014; 59: 30-34
• 3 Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop 2018; 42: 191-196
• 4 Ferris H, Brent L, Coughlan T. Early mobilisation reduces the risk of in-hospital mortality following hip fracture. Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11: 527-533
• 5 Hake ME, Davis ME, Perdue AM. et al. Modern implant options for the treatment of distal femur fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27: e867-e875
• 6 Fontenot PB, Diaz M, Stoops K. et al. Supplementation of lateral locked plating for distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33: 642-648
• 7 Braun BJ, Veith NT, Rollmann M. et al. Weight-bearing recommendations after operative fracture treatment—fact or fiction? Gait results with and feasibility of a dynamic, continuous pedobarography insole. Int Orthop 2017; 41: 1507-1512
• 8 Kammerlander C, Pfeufer D, Lisitano LA. et al. Inability of older adult patients with hip fracture to maintain postoperative weight-bearing restrictions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100: 936-941
• 9 Pfeufer D, Zeller A, Mehaffey S. et al. Weight-bearing restrictions reduce postoperative mobility in elderly hip fracture patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139: 1253-1259
• 10 Unger EW, Histing T, Rollmann MF. et al. Development of a dynamic fall risk profile in elderly nursing home residents: A free field gait analysis based study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2021; 93: 104294
• 11 Keenan OJ, Ross LA, Magill M. et al. Immediate weight-bearing is safe following lateral locked plate fixation of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures. Knee Surg Relat Res 2021; 33: 19
• 12 Sidhu GAS, Singh H, Selhi H. et al. The Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Far Cortex Locking Plate in Distal Femur Fractures. Cureus 2021; 13: e14289
• 13 Loosen A, Fritz Y, Dietrich M. Surgical treatment of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2019; 10: 2151459319860723
• 14 Consigliere P, Iliopoulos E, Ads T. et al. Early versus delayed weight bearing after surgical fixation of distal femur fractures: a non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29: 1789-1794
• 15 Wang SH, Wu CC, Li WT. et al. Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation with combined locking plate and interfragmentary screws. Int J Surg 2019; 65: 107-112
• 16 Mitchell PM, Lee AK, Collinge CA. et al. Early Comparative Outcomes of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Plate in the Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: 386-390
• 17 Poole WEC, Wilson DGG, Guthrie HC. et al. ‘Modern’distal femoral locking plates allow safe, early weight-bearing with a high rate of union and low rate of failure: five-year experience from a United Kingdom major trauma centre. Bone Joint J 2017; 99: 951-957
• 18 Smith WR, Stoneback JW, Morgan SJ. et al. Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg 2016; 10: 26
• 19 Smith JR, Halliday R, Aquilina AL. et al. Distal femoral fractures: the need to review the standard of care. Injury 2015; 46: 1084-1088
• 20 Khursheed O, Wani MM, Rashid S. et al. Results of treatment of distal extra: articular femur fractures with locking plates using minimally invasive approach—experience with 25 consecutive geriatric patients. Musculoskelet Surg 2015; 99: 139-147
• 21 Horneff 3rd JG, Scolaro JA, Jafari SM. et al. Intramedullary nailing versus locked plate for treating supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. Orthopedics 2013; 36: e561-e566
• 22 Lieder CM, Gaski GE, Virkus WW. et al. Is immediate weight-bearing safe after single implant fixation of elderly distal femur fractures?. J Orthop Trauma 2021; 35: 49-55
• 23 Zhao Z, Li Y, Ullah K. et al. The antegrade angle-stable locking intramedullary nail for type-C distal femoral fractures: a thirty four case experience. Int Orthop 2018; 42: 659-665
• 24 Biber R, Bail HJ. Retrograde Marknagelung bei periprothetischen Frakturen des distalen Femurs. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2014; 26: 438-454
• 25 Al Farii H, Cloutier J-P, AlQahtani S. et al. Endosteal substitution with medial plate in the treatment of acute distal femur fracture (AO/OTA type A): surgical technique and case-series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022; 32: 211-217
• 26 Park KH, Oh CW, Park KC. et al. Excellent outcomes after double-locked plating in very low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141: 207-214
• 27 Liporace FA, Yoon RS. Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33: e64-e68
• 28 Hussain MS, Dailey SK, Avilucea FR. Stable fixation and immediate weight-bearing after combined retrograde intramedullary nailing and open reduction internal fixation of noncomminuted distal interprosthetic femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: e237-e240
• 29 Bettin CC, Weinlein JC, Toy PC. et al. Distal femoral replacement for acute distal femoral fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Trauma 2016; 30: 503-509
• 30 Rao B, Kamal T, Vafe J. et al. Distal femoral replacement for selective periprosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2014; 40: 191-199
• 31 Fakler JK, Hepp P, Marquaß B. et al. Is distal femoral replacement an adequate therapeutic option after complex fractures of the distal femur?. Z Orthop Unfall 2013; 151: 173-179
• 32 Zhang Y, Zhao X, Tang Y. et al. Application of Ni-Ti Alloy connector for the treatment of comminuted coronal plane supracondylar-condylar femoral fractures: a retrospective review of 21 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 355
• 33 Bel JC, Court C, Cogan A. et al. Unicondylar fractures of the distal femur. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100: 873-877
• 34 Kubiak EN, Beebe MJ, North K. et al. Early weight bearing after lower extremity fractures in adults. JAAOS-J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 727-738
• 35 Wähnert D, Hoffmeier K, Fröber R. et al. Distal femur fractures of the elderly – different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury 2011; 42: 655-659