Graft Failure after PKP and DMEK: What is the Best Option?

Abstract

Corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed human tissue transplantation procedure worldwide. Due to the large number of grafts, corneal graft failure has become one of the most common indications for corneal transplantation for immunological and non-immunological reasons (e.g. recurrence of underlying disease, high intraocular pressure, grafted guttae, transmitted HSV or CMV infection). The relatively recently developed lamellar grafting techniques have introduced certain potential complications that may lead to graft failure and require approaches other than penetrating keratoplasty for re-grafting. On the other hand, these new lamellar techniques also offer new possibilities for salvaging failed penetrating grafts, with potential advantages over successive penetrating keratoplasties, such as lower intraoperative risks, faster visual rehabilitation and reduced risk of immune reaction. Today, the patient with good healing who is satisfied with his graft before endothelial decompensation, with low astigmatism and no stromal scars, represents the optimal condition for DMEK after PKP. This can also be combined with phacoemulsification (so-called triple DMEK). Otherwise, a penetrating re-keratoplasty with a larger graft (typically excimer laser repeat PKP 8.5/8.6 mm) is performed to treat edema, scars and irregular astigmatism simultaneously. The medical history carries weight in this decision! Re-DMEK in case of graft failure after DMEK and DSAEK does not require any modification of the standard technique and leads to good visual acuity results if performed quickly. If there is clear stromal scarring after multiple (external) DMEKs, PKP can also be considered to rectify the situation. Otherwise causeless recurrent graft failures must suggest herpetic or CMV endotheliitis and, after PCR analysis of the aqueous humour aspirate, be treated appropriately with medication.

Key words

penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) - Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) - graft failure - technique - immune reaction - endotheliitis

Publication History

Received: 03 January 2022

Accepted: 11 February 2022

Article published online:
29 April 2022

• References/Literatur

• 1 Wu J, Wu T, Li J. et al. DSAEK or DMEK for failed penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol 2021; 41: 2315-2328
• 2 Flockerzi E, Maier P, Böhringer D. et al. Trends in corneal transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany – A report of the Section DOG-Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 188: 91-98
• 3 Seitz B, Daas L, Hamon L. et al. Stadiengerechte Therapie des Keratokonus (CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung). Ophthalmologe 2021; 118: 1069-1088
• 4 Sourlis C, Seitz B, Hamon L. et al. An attempt to improve the post-keratoplasty outcome of severe acute fungal keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 [im Review]
• 5 Szentmáry N, Goebels S, El-Husseiny M. et al. Immunreaktionen nach Femtosekunden- und Excimerlaser-Keratoplastik. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2013; 230: 486-489
• 6 Molter Y, Milioti G, Langenbucher A. et al. Zeitpunkt, Rezidiv und Prognose der immunologischen Abstoßungsreaktion nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Ophthalmologe 2020; 117: 548-556
• 7 Toker E, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. et al. Penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial decompensation in eyes with buphthalmos. Cornea 2003; 22: 198-204
• 8 Safi T, Daas L, Alexandersson J. et al. Semi-quantitative criteria in the eye bank that correlate with cornea guttata in donor corneas. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238: 680-687
• 9 Schönit S, Maamri A, Zemova E. et al. Prevalence and impact of cornea guttata in the graft after penetrating keratoplasty in Germany. Cornea 2022;
• 10 Stavridis E, Gatzioufas Z, Hasenfus A. et al. [Ping-Pong-Transmission von Herpes-simplex-Virus 1 nach Hornhauttransplantation]. Ophthalmologe 2012; 109: 1017-1021
• 11 Tóth G, Berkó-Göttel B, Seitz B. et al. Herpes simplex virus PCR in 2230 explanted corneal buttons. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100: e77-e82
• 12 Baydoun L, van Dijk K, Dapena I. et al. Repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after complicated primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 8-16
• 13 Droutsas K, Alexopoulos P, Giachos I. et al. Secondary DMEK following failed primary DMEK. Int Ophthalmol 2021; 41: 3287-3293
• 14 Schmidt I, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Langenbucher A. et al. Ultrastructural findings in graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and new triple procedure. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e15493
• 15 Seitz B, Daas L, Flockerzi E. et al. „Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty“ DMEK – Spender und Empfänger Schritt für Schritt. Ophthalmologe 2020; 117: 811-828
• 16 Yoeruek E, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after failed primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results. Cornea 2013; 32: 1414-1417
• 17 Hos D, Tuac O, Schaub F. et al. Incidence and clinical course of immune reactions after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutive eyes. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 512-518
• 18 Seitz B, El-Husseiny M, Langenbucher A. et al. Prophylaxe und Management von Komplikationen bei perforierender Keratoplastik. Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 605-613
• 19 Fiorentzis M, Viestenz AR, Viestenz AN, Seitz B. Intracameral dexamethason injection as adjuvant therapy in endothelial immune reaction after penetrating and posterior lamellar keratoplasty: A retrospective clinical observation. Adv Ther 2017; 34: 1928-1935
• 20 Bachmann BO, Pleyer U, Maier PC. et al. Perioperative/Postoperative anti-inflammatorische Therapie während/nach Hornhaut-Chirurgie/Transplantation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2019; 236: 653-661
• 21 Seitz B, Szentmáry N, El-Husseiny M, Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Naumann GOH. The penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) – A Century of Success. In: Hjortdal J. ed. Corneal Transplantation. Aarhus: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2016: 67-92
• 22 Anshu A, Chee SP, Mehta JS. et al. Cytomegalovirus endotheliitis in Descemetʼs stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 624-630
• 23 Basilious A, Chew HF. Topical Ganciclovir for Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus Endotheliitis in Endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea 2019; 38: 120-122
• 24 Matar C, Seitz B, Daas L. Rezidivierendes DMEK Versagen. Ophthalmologe 2021; 118: 719-723
• 25 Alió Del Bario JL, Bhogal M, Ang M. et al. Corneal transplantation after failed grafts: Options and outcomes. Surv Ophthalmol 2021; 66: 20-40
• 26 Sorkin N, Showail M, Einan-Lifshitz A. et al. Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With a Previous Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft. Cornea 2018; 37: 678-681
• 27 Weller JM, Tourtas T, Kruse FE. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as treatment for graft failure after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159: 1050-1057.e2
• 28 Brockmann T, Brockmann C, Maier AK. et al. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Graft Failure After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Clinical Results and Histopathologic Findings. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 813-819
• 29 Agha B, Shajari M, Slavik-Lencova A. et al. Functional outcome of repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal decompensation following graft failure after primary DMEK. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13: 477-482
• 30 Price MO, Feng MT, McKee Y. et al. Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Secondary Grafts with Early Intervention Are Comparable with Fellow-Eye Primary Grafts. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 1639-1644
• 31 Aljundi W, Suffo S, Abdin AD. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in previously vitrectomized eyes: techniques, complications and clinical outcome. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238: 1101-1107
• 32 Cohen E, Mimouni M, Sorkin N. et al. Risk Factors for Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Failure. Am J Ophthalmol 2021; 226: 165-171
• 33 Santaella G, Sorkin N, Mimouni M. et al. Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Aphakic and Aniridic Patients. Cornea 2020; 39: 1389-1393
• 34 Moura-Coelho N, Manero F, Elies D. et al. Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty at a Referral Center for Keratoplasty in Spain: DIMOEK Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 215: 49-55
• 35 Agha B, Dawson DG, Kohnen T. et al. Corneal Densitometry After Secondary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea 2019; 38: 1083-1092
• 36 Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Küchle M. et al. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2162-2167
• 37 Szentmáry N, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. et al. Repeat keratoplasty for correction of high or irregular postkeratoplasty astigmatism in clear corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 826-830
• 38 Alfaro Rangel R, Szentmáry N, Lepper S. et al. 8.5/8.6-mm excimer laser assisted penetrating keratoplasties in a tertiary corneal subspecialty referral center – Indications and outcomes in 107 eyes. Cornea 2020; 39: 806-811
• 39 Berger T, Seitz B, Flockerzi F. et al. Recurrent Filamentous Fungal Keratitis Caused When the Primarily Selected Graft Diameter was Too Small. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2022;
• 40 Alfaro Rangel R, Szentmáry N, Lepper S. et al. Large-diameter penetrating keratoplasties are mostly due to very severe infectious keratitis and cannot always prevent secondary enucleation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021;
• 41 Asi F, Daas L, Viestenz A. et al. Medical and surgical lessons learned from a severe case of fusarium solani keratitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44: 106-108
• 42 Asi F, Milioti G, Seitz B. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for corneal decompensation caused by herpes simplex virus endotheliitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44: 106-108
• 43 Asi F, Daas L, Milioti G. et al. Triple Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) for Haab striae with endothelial decompensation in congenital glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg Online Case Reports 2019; 7: 38-41
• 44 Pasari A, Price MO, Feng MT. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for failed penetrating keratoplasty: visual outcomes and graft survival. Cornea 2019; 38: 151-156
• 45 Abdin A, Daas L, Pattmöller M. et al. Negative impact of Dextran in organ culture media for precut tissue preservation on DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256: 2135-2142
• 46 Safi T, Seitz B, Berg K. et al. Reproducibility of Non-Invasive Endothelial Cell Loss Assessment of the Pre-Stripped DMEK Roll After Preparation and Storage. Am J Ophthalmol 2021; 221: 17-26
• 47 Ang M, Ho H, Wong C. et al. Endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: an alternative to repeat penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 1221-1227
• 48 Pierné K, Panthier C, Courtin R. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2019; 38: 280-284
• 49 Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 979-985
• 50 Alió del Bario JL, Montesel A, Ho V. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty without host descemetorhexis for the management of secondary graft failure. Cornea 2020; 39: 13-17
• 51 Nottage JM, Nirankari VS. Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemetʼs stripping in eyes with previous penetrating corneal transplants. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 24-27
• 52 Lavy I, Liarakos VS, Verdijk RM. et al. Outcome and histopathology of secondary penetrating keratoplasty graft failure managed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2017; 36: 777-784
• 53 Einan-Lifshitz A, Belkin A, Sorkin N. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after penetrating keratoplasty: features for success. Cornea 2018; 37: 1093-1097
• 54 Seitz B, Daas L, Flockerzi E. et al. Umfrage: Transplantatversagen nach perforierender Keratoplastik – was tun? – Für die DMEK nach PKP plädieren wir besonders, wenn bereits eine torische IOL zur Kompensation eines hohen Astigmatismus eingesetzt wurde. Ophthalmo-Chirurgie 2021; 22: 341-348
• 55 Anshu A, Price MO, Price jr. FW. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and hybrid techniques for managing failed penetrating grafts. Cornea 2013; 32: 1-4
• 56 Gundlach E, Maier AKB, Riechardt AI. et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as a secondary approach after failure of penetrating keratoplasty. Exp Clin Transplant 2015; 13: 350-354
• 57 Kiel M, Bu JB, Gericke A. et al. Comparison of DMEK and DSAEK in Eyes With Endothelial Decompensation After Previous Penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea 2021; 40: 1218-1224
• 58 Einan-Lifshitz A, Mednick Z, Belkin A. et al. Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea 2019; 38: 1077-1082