Download PDF
Sportphysio 2022; 10(02): 73-83
DOI: 10.1055/a-1777-1548
Focus
Praxis

RTS nach Syndesmosenruptur – ein neuer Ansatz für die Rehabilitation

Pieter D’Hooghe
,
Igor Tak
,
Alli Gokeler
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Eine qualitativ hochwertige Rehabilitation ist eine wesentliche Voraussetzung für die Rückkehr zum Sport nach einer Syndesmosenverletzung. Die Autoren stellen einen neuen Ansatz vor, der diesem Anspruch gerecht wird.



Publication History

Article published online:
03 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Almonroeder TG, Kernozek T, Cobb S. et al. Cognitive demands influence lower extremity mechanics during a drop vertical jump task in female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018; 48: 381-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Andreo P, Khalaf K, Heale L. et al. Effects of kinesiology tape on non-linear center of mass dispersion during the y balance test. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A. et al. Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 853-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baumeister J. Sensorimotor control and associated brain activity in sports medicine research. Habilitation: Universität Paderborn; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Bolt R, Heuvelmans P, Benjaminse A. et al. An ecological dynamics approach to ACL injury risk research: A current opinion. Sport Biomech 2021; 10: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Burcal CJ, Needle AR, Custer L. et al. The effects of cognitive loading on motor behavior in injured individuals: A systematic review. Sport Med 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s40279–019–01116–7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 D’Hooghe P, Grassi A, Alkhelaifi K. et al. Return to play after surgery for isolated unstable syndesmotic ankle injuries (West Point grade IIB and III) in 110 male professional football players: A retrospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 1168-1173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dos’Santos T, Thomas C, McBurnie A. et al. Biomechanical determinants of performance and injury risk during cutting: A performance-injury conflict?. Sport Med 2021; 51: 1983-1998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gibson JJ. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin; Boston: 1966
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Giesche F, Stief F, Groneberg DA, Wilke J. Effect of unplanned athletic movement on knee mechanics: A systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55 (23) 1366-1378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gokeler A, Benjaminse A, Della Villa F. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms through a neurocognition lens: Implications for injury screening. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2021; 7: e001091
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gokeler A, McKeon PO, Hoch MC. Shaping the functional task environment in sports injury rehabilitation: A framework to integrate perceptual-cognitive training in rehabilitation. Athl Train Sport Heal Care 2020; 12: 283-292
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hughes G, Dai B. The influence of decision making and divided attention on lower limb biomechanics associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: A narrative review. Sport Biomech 2021; 6: 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lubberts B, D’Hooghe P, Bengtsson H. et al. Epidemiology and return to play following isolated syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: A prospective cohort study of 3677 male professional footballers in the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study. Br J Sports Med 2019; 53: 959-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Needle AR, Kaminski TW, Baumeister J. et al. The relationship between joint stiffness and muscle activity in unstable ankles and copers. J Sport Rehabil 2017; 26: 15-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 BPicot B, Terrier R, Forestier N. et al. The Star Excursion Balance Test: An update review and practical guidelines. Int J Athl Ther Train 2021; 26: 285-293
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Renshaw I, Davids K, Araújo D. et al. Evaluating weaknesses of „perceptual-cognitive training“ and „brain training“ methods in sport: An ecological dynamics critique. Front Psychol 2019; 9 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02468.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schnittjer A, Simon JE, Yom J. et al. The effects of a cognitive dual task on jump-landing movement quality. Int J Sports Med 2021; 42: 90-95
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Waterman BR, Belmont PJ, Cameron KL. et al. Risk factors for syndesmotic and medial ankle sprain: Role of sex, sport, and level of competition. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 992-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wilke J, Giesche F, Niederer D. et al. Increased visual distraction can impair landing biomechanics. Biol Sport 2021; 38: 123-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wilkerson GB. Biomechanical and neuromuscular effects of ankle taping and bracing. J Athl Train 2002; 37: 436-445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar