Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(07): 944-948
DOI: 10.1055/a-1788-4716
Original Article

Validated, Consensus-Based Second- and Third-Trimester Sonographic Learning Objectives for the Obstetrics Clerkship

Eleanor Wade
1   Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Women's Health Department, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia
,
Christina M. McBride
1   Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Women's Health Department, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia
,
Sara L. Elling
2   Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Women's Health Department, Walter Reed Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Katerina Shvartsman
3   Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Andrew S. Thagard 
1   Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Women's Health Department, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Currently, there are no established guidelines for obstetric ultrasound training at the core medical student clerkship level. Our objective was to develop practical, consensus-based learning objectives in second- and third-trimester ultrasound and assess the feasibility of implementing these objectives into a clinical curriculum.

Study Design Using the modified Delphi approach, a panel of expert stakeholders (n = 23) was assembled to reach consensus on the proposed learning objectives. A model curriculum was created consisting of a video tutorial, in-person training, and an optional tracker and piloted at two academic medical centers. Participant perception of acquired ultrasound skills and the program were assessed using a modified, previously validated survey. Pre- and postprogram survey responses were compared using the Chi-squared test of association. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results The expert panel reached consensus on five learning objectives to include determination of fetal number and presentation, assessment of fetal heart rate, determination of placental location, assessment of amniotic fluid volume, and a general understanding of the biophysical profile and its indications. A total of 26 students participated in the piloted curriculum. On completion, a majority of participants reported improved confidence in understanding and performing prenatal ultrasound in the second and third trimesters (p < 0.05). The majority of participants valued a hands-on ultrasound curriculum.

Conclusion We propose practical, consensus-based learning objectives for second- and third-trimester sonography during the core clerkship with demonstrated feasibility in a two-center pilot program.

Key Points

  • Ultrasound is a valuable skill for medical students.

  • Specific learning objectives in obstetric ultrasound are currently lacking.

  • We propose consensus-based objectives and a model curriculum.

  • A two-center pilot study demonstrated efficacy.

Keywords

ultrasound - medical student - clerkship - obstetrics - modified Delphi

Note

The opinions and assertions expressed in this article reflect the results of research conducted by the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University, Department of the Navy, Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.


E.W., S.L.E., and A.S.T. are military service members and C.M.M. and K.S. are federal employees. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 06 July 2021

Accepted: 17 February 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
04 March 2022

Article published online:
16 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Abuhamad A, Chaoui R, Jeanty P, Paladini D, Walsh E. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Practical Approach. 1st ed.. Norfolk, VA,: Eastern Virginia Medical School;; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) e241-e256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical student ultrasound education: a WFUMB position paper, part I. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45 (02) 271-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hoffmann B, Blaivas M, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical student ultrasound education, a WFUMB position paper, part II. A consensus statement of ultrasound societies. Med Ultrason 2020; 22 (02) 220-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ma IWY, Steinmetz P, Weerdenburg K. et al. The Canadian medical student ultrasound curriculum: a statement from the Canadian Ultrasound Consensus for undergraduate medical education group. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39 (07) 1279-1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bahner DP, Goldman E, Way D, Royall NA, Liu YT. The state of ultrasound education in U.S. medical schools: results of a national survey. Acad Med 2014; 89 (12) 1681-1686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 ISUOG Education Committee recommendations for basic training in obstetric and gynecological ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43 (01) 113-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tolsgaard MG, Ringsted C, Dreisler E. et al. Reliable and valid assessment of ultrasound operator competence in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43 (04) 437-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Abuhamad A, Minton KK, Benson CB. et al. Obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound curriculum and competency assessment in residency training programs: consensus report. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37 (01) 19-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA. et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg 2018; 28 (02) 303-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI. et al. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53 (01) 107-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wilpers A, Bahtiyar MO, Wall D. et al. Modified Delphi study on nursing practice and science in fetal care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2021; 50 (01) 55-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011; 6 (06) e20476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 2017; 31 (08) 684-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McAllister S, McIntire S, Kondrashova T. Integration of 3-dimensional/4-dimensional ultrasound technology into undergraduate medical education: student perception of innovative obstetrics education. Mo Med 2018; 115 (01) 44-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Feilchenfeld Z, Dornan T, Whitehead C, Kuper A. Ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: a systematic and critical review. Med Educ 2017; 51 (04) 366-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar