Relevante Gefäßanatomie für die minimalinvasive Pankreaschirurgie

Die Kenntnis relevanter Gefäßvariationen ist nicht nur in der hepatobiliären und pankreatischen Chirurgie (HPB-Chirurgie) ausschlaggebend, sondern auch bei Eingriffen im oberen und unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt. In erster Linie dient dieses Wissen den Zielen der Blutungsvorbeugung und -kontrolle. Die Vermeidung vaskulärer Komplikationen und die sichere Orientierung anhand der Gefäßlandmarken bei der Präparation sind insbesondere in der minimalinvasiven Chirurgie essenziell.

Schlüsselwörter

Pankreaschirurgie - minimalinvasive Chirurgie - Robotic - Pankreaskarzinom - Gefäßanatomie

• Literatur

• 1 Kausch W. Das Carcinom der Papilla duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung. Beitr Klin Chir 1912; 78: 439-486
• 2 Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of VATER. Ann Surg 1935; 102: 763-779
• 3 Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 408-410
• 4 Cuschieri A, Jakimowicz JJ, van Spreeuwel J. Laparoscopic distal 70 % pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 280-285
• 5 Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE. et al. Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 4329-4336
• 6 Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR. et al. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003; 13: 33-36
• 7 Gavriilidis P, Lim C, Menahem B. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy – The first meta-analysis. HPB 2016; 18: 567-574
• 8 Lefor AK. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas: an historical review. BMC Biomed Eng 2019; 1: 2
• 9 Kantor O, Talamonti MS, Sharpe S. et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term overall survival rates similar to those for open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2017; 213: 512-515
• 10 Girgis MD, Zenati MS, King JC. et al. Oncologic outcomes after robotic pancreatic resections are not inferior to open surgery. Ann Surg 2021; 274: e262-e268
• 11 de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H. et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 2-9
• 12 Vollmer CM, Asbun HJ, Barkun J. et al. Proceedings of the first international state-of-the- art conference on minimally-invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). HPB 2017; 19: 171-177
• 13 Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL. et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 1-14
• 14 Nakata K, Higuchi R, Ikenaga N. et al. Precision anatomy for safe approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for both open and minimally invasive procedure: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 99-113
• 15 Nishino H, Zimmitti G, Ohtsuka T. et al. Precision vascular anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 126-150
• 16 Nagakawa Y, Watanabe Y, Kozono S. et al. Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 114-123
• 17 Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 50-52
• 18 Cirocchi R, DʼAndrea V, Amato B. et al. Aberrant left hepatic arteries arising from left gastric arteries and their clinical importance. Surgeon 2020; 18: 100-112
• 19 Okada K-I, Kawai M, Hirono S. et al. A replaced right hepatic artery adjacent to pancreatic carcinoma should be divided to obtain R0 resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015; 400: 57-65
• 20 Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto Y, Arita J. et al. Vascular anatomy of the jejunal mesentery and complications associated with division of the first jejunal venous trunk during pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117: 1297-1304
• 21 Nakamura M, Nakashima H, Tsutsumi K. et al. First jejunal vein oriented mesenteric excision for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 989-995
• 22 Nagakawa Y, Hosokawa Y, Sahara Y. et al. Approaching the superior mesenteric artery from the right side using the proximal-dorsal jejunal vein preisolation method during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 4044-4051
• 23 Wedel T. Embryologie und chirurgische Anatomie des Kolons. In: Benz S, Grützmann R, Stinner B. Hrsg. Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2021: 21-38
• 24 Negoi I, Beuran M, Hostiuc S. et al. Surgical anatomy of the superior mesenteric vessels related to colon and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 4184
• 25 Pran L, Baijoo S, Dan D. et al. The vein of Belcher: revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22: 1303-1304
• 26 Thomaschewski M, Zimmermann M, Honselmann K. et al. Robotisch assistierte Resektion eines zentralen neoadjuvant behandelten Pankreaskarzinoms mit En-bloc-Resektion des Truncus coeliacus (modifizierte Appleby-Operation). Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146: 552-559
• 27 Luu AM, Braumann C, Herzog T. et al. Circumportal pancreas-a must know pancreatic anomaly for the pancreatic surgeon. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21: 344-351
• 28 Joseph P, Raju RS, Vyas FL. et al. Portal annular pancreas. A rare variant and a new classification. JOP 2010; 11: 453-455
• 29 Karasaki H, Mizukami Y, Ishizaki A. et al. Portal annular pancreas, a notable pancreatic malformation: frequency, morphology, and implications for pancreatic surgery. Surgery 2009; 146: 515-518
• 30 Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Małczak P. et al. Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy-feasibility study of a modified “artery first” approach to pancreatic head cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402: 917-923
• 31 Wang XM, Sun WD, Hu MH. et al. Inferoposterior duodenal approach for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 2142-2148
• 32 Honda G, Kurata M, Okuda Y. et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: taking advantage of the unique view from the caudal side. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: e45-e49
• 33 Cho A, Yamamoto H, Kainuma O. Tips of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: superior mesenteric artery first approach (with video). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014; 21: E19-21
• 34 Liao CH, Liu YY, Wang SY. et al. The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-a stepwise procedure and learning curve. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402: 853-861
• 35 Cai Y, Gao P, Li Y. et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major venous resection and reconstruction: anterior superior mesenteric artery first approach. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 4209-4215
• 36 Ishikawa Y, Ban D, Watanabe S. et al. Splenic artery as a simple landmark indicating difficulty during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2019; 12: 81-87
• 37 Inoko K, Ebihara Y, Sakamoto K. et al. Strategic approach to the splenic artery in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015; 25: e122-e125
• 38 Pandey SK, Bhattacharya S, Mishra RN. et al. Anatomical variations of the splenic artery and its clinical implications. Clin Anat 2004; 17: 497-502
• 39 Kimura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N. et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgery 1996; 120: 885-890
• 40 Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 1988; 123: 550-553
• 41 Nakata K, Shikata S, Ohtsuka T. et al. Minimally invasive preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25: 476-488
• 42 Kim H, Song KB, Hwang DW. et al. A single-center experience with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique in 122 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 4057-4064
• 43 Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 2003; 133: 521-527