Diagnostik von Motilitätsstörungen des Ösophagus – Bedeutung der neuen Chicago-Klassifikation v4.0

Zusammenfassung

Ösophagusmotilitätsstörungen sind Erkrankungen, bei denen es aufgrund einer Veränderung der neuromuskulären Strukturen zu Fehlfunktionen des Schluckakts kommt. Das Leitsymptom ist daher die Dysphagie für feste und/oder flüssige Speisen, häufig begleitet von Symptomen wie Thoraxschmerz, Regurgitation, Sodbrennen und Gewichtsverlust. Die Ösophagusmanometrie ist der Goldstandard in der Diagnostik. Endoskopie und Radiologie dienen dem Ausschluss entzündlicher oder maligner Veränderungen.

Durch die Einführung der hochauflösenden Ösophagusmanometrie (HRM) hat sich die Diagnostik der Ösophagusmotilitätsstörungen verbessert und mit der Chicago-Klassifikation zu einer neuen Einteilung geführt, die im letzten Jahrzehnt mehrfach modifiziert wurde, zuletzt 2021 mit der Chicago-Klassifikation v4.0. Verglichen mit der Vorversion v3.0 finden sich einige wichtige Änderungen, die anhand der im klinischen Alltag wichtigsten Ösophagusmotilitätsstörungen vorgestellt werden.

Abstract

Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.

Schlüsselwörter

Ösophagusmotilitätsstörung - hochauflösende Ösophagusmanometrie (HRM) - Chicago-Klassifikation v4.0 - Achalasie - Abflussbehinderung des ösophago-gastralen Übergangs - distaler Ösophagusspasmus - hyperkontraktiler Ösophagus - ineffektive Ösophagusmotilität

Keywords

Motility disorders of the esophagus - high resolution manometry (HRM) - Chicago classification v4.0 - achalasia - esophago-gastric junction (EGJ)-outflow obstruction - distal esophageal spasm - hypercontractile esophagus - ineffective esophageal motility

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. November 2021

Angenommen nach Revision: 15. April 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Juli 2022

• Literaturverzeichnis

• 1 Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J. et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 27-37
• 2 Herregods TV, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. et al. Normative values in esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 175-187
• 3 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 160-174
• 4 Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR. et al. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0((c)). Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33: e14058
• 5 Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F. et al. High-Resolution Manometry Improves the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia: A Randomized Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 372-380
• 6 Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ. et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 57-65
• 7 Kahrilas PJ, Sifrim D. High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 756-769
• 8 Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. et al. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21: 796-806
• 9 Keller J, Fox MR, Allescher HD. et al. Interpretation und performance of high-resolution esophageal manometry: Recommendations of the German Association of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (DGNM) and the German Association of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS). Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56: 1378-1408
• 10 Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M. et al. Diagnostic yield of high-resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2: 654-661
• 11 Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, Butikofer S. et al. Prospective serial diagnostic study: the effects of position and provocative tests on the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders by high-resolution manometry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51: 706-718
• 12 Fox MR, Sweis R, Yadlapati R. et al. Chicago classification version 4.0((c)) technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33: e14120
• 13 Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B. et al. Rapid Drink Challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29
• 14 Muller M, Gockel I. Esophageal motility disorders. Internist (Berl) 2015; 56: 615-616
• 15 Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Butikofer S. et al. Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2: 644-653
• 16 Koop I. Gastroenterologie compact. Alles für Klinik und Praxis. Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2013.
• 17 Hurst AF, Rowlands RP. Case of Achalasia of the Cardia relieved by Operation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1924; 17: 45-46
• 18 Ates F, Vaezi MF. The Pathogenesis and Management of Achalasia: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 449-463
• 19 Clark SB, Rice TW, Tubbs RR. et al. The nature of the myenteric infiltrate in achalasia: an immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 1153-1158
• 20 Gockel I, Becker J, Wouters MM. et al. Common variants in the HLA-DQ region confer susceptibility to idiopathic achalasia. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 901-904
• 21 Wouters MM, Lambrechts D, Becker J. et al. Genetic variation in the lymphotoxin-alpha (LTA)/tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) locus as a risk factor for idiopathic achalasia. Gut 2014; 63: 1401-1409
• 22 Romero-Hernandez F, Furuzawa-Carballeda J, Hernandez-Molina G. et al. Autoimmune comorbidity in achalasia patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 203-208
• 23 Francis DL, Katzka DA. Achalasia: update on the disease and its treatment. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 369-374
• 24 Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G. et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31
• 25 Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology 1992; 103: 1732-1738
• 26 Jung DH, Park H. Is Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Achalasia Coincident or Not?. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23: 5-8
• 27 Gockel I, Rabe SM, Niebisch S. Before and after Esophageal Surgery: Which Information Is Needed from the Functional Laboratory?. Visc Med 2018; 34: 116-121
• 28 Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J. et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G878-885
• 29 Passaretti S, Zaninotto G, Di Martino N. et al. Standards for oesophageal manometry. A position statement from the Gruppo Italiano di Studio Motilita Apparato Digerente (GISMAD). Dig Liver Dis 2000; 32: 46-55
• 30 Herbella FAM, Del Grande LM, Schlottmann F. et al. Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0). Adv Ther 2021; 38: 2017-2026
• 31 van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 1310-1316
• 32 Scherer JR, Kwiatek MA, Soper NJ. et al. Functional esophagogastric junction obstruction with intact peristalsis: a heterogeneous syndrome sometimes akin to achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 2219-2225
• 33 Bredenoord AJ, Babaei A, Carlson D. et al. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33: e14193
• 34 Samo S, Qayed E. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction: Where are we now in diagnosis and management?. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25: 411-417
• 35 McMahon BP, Frokjaer JB, Kunwald P. et al. The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for evaluation of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292: G377-384
• 36 Murray FR, Fischbach LM, Schindler V. et al. Solid Swallow Examination During High Resolution Manometry and EGJ-Distensibility Help Identify Esophageal Outflow Obstruction in Non-obstructive Dysphagia. Dysphagia 2022; 37: 168-176
• 37 Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 230-236
• 38 Clouse RE. Psychiatric disorders in patients with esophageal disease. Med Clin North Am 1991; 75: 1081-1096
• 39 Ratuapli SK, Crowell MD, DiBaise JK. et al. Opioid-Induced Esophageal Dysfunction (OIED) in Patients on Chronic Opioids. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 979-984
• 40 Osgood H. A Peculiar Form of Œsorhagismus. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1889; 120: 401-405
• 41 Almansa C, Heckman MG, DeVault KR. et al. Esophageal spasm: demographic, clinical, radiographic, and manometric features in 108 patients. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25: 214-221
• 42 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Carlson DA. et al. Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1692-1700
• 43 Achem SR, Gerson LB. Distal esophageal spasm: an update. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013; 15: 325
• 44 Muller M, Eckardt AJ, Gopel B. et al. Clinical and manometric course of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 683-689
• 45 De Schepper HU, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Distal esophageal spasm evolving to achalasia in high resolution. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: A25-26
• 46 Tsuboi K, Mittal SK. Diffuse esophageal spasm: has the term lost its relevance? Analysis of 217 cases. Dis Esophagus 2011; 24: 354-359
• 47 Benjamin SB, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO. High amplitude, peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology 1979; 77: 478-483
• 48 Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42: 27-43
• 49 Al-Qaisi MT, Siddiki HA, Crowell MD. et al. The clinical significance of hypercontractile peristalsis: comparison of high-resolution manometric features, demographics, symptom presentation, and response to therapy in patients with Jackhammer esophagus versus Nutcracker esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30: 1-7
• 50 Khalaf M, Chowdhary S, Elias PS. et al. Distal Esophageal Spasm: A Review. Am J Med 2018; 131: 1034-1040
• 51 Korsapati H, Bhargava V, Mittal RK. Reversal of asynchrony between circular and longitudinal muscle contraction in nutcracker esophagus by atropine. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 796-802
• 52 Jia Y, Arenas J, Hejazi RA. et al. Frequency of Jackhammer Esophagus as the Extreme Phenotypes of Esophageal Hypercontractility Based on the New Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50: 615-618
• 53 Abdallah J, Fass R. Progression of Jackhammer Esophagus to Type II Achalasia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 22: 153-156
• 54 Sanagapalli S, Roman S, Hastier A. et al. Achalasia diagnosed despite normal integrated relaxation pressure responds favorably to therapy. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31: e13586
• 55 Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Diagnostic differences in the pharmacologic response to cholecystokinin and amyl nitrite in patients with absent contractility vs type I Achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32: e13857
• 56 Mercado U, Arroyo de Anda R, Avendano L. et al. Metoclopramide response in patients with early diffuse systemic sclerosis. Effects on esophageal motility abnormalities. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23: 685-688
• 57 Weiss AH, Iorio N, Schey R. Esophageal motility in eosinophilic esophagitis. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2015; 80: 205-213