CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endoscopy 2022; 54(S 02): E894-E895
DOI: 10.1055/a-1841-5607
E-Videos

Cold-snare endoscopic mucosal resection of large duodenal laterally spreading tumors: is cold the future gold standard?

Sophie Geyl
1   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France
,
Marion Schaefer
2   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France
,
Mathieu Pioche
3   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, CHU Lyon, France
,
Martin Dahan
1   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France
,
Romain Legros
1   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France
,
Jérémie Albouys
1   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France
,
Jérémie Jacques
1   Service d’Hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France
4   BioEM, XLim, UMR 7252, CNRS, Limoges, France
› Author Affiliations

Large laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) of the duodenum are considered by most experts to be very challenging benign lesions requiring endoscopic resection. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the gold standard but leads to a high recurrence rate and a risk of delayed bleeding.

Piecemeal cold snare EMR [1] has recently been reported as a promising new tool for excising sessile serrated lesions with the same efficiency as classic piecemeal EMR but with a better safety profile, with no perforations and a significantly lower rate of delayed post-EMR bleeding. Here, we report the case of a large 4-cm LST of the duodenum treated with cold snare piecemeal EMR ([Fig. 1], [Fig. 2], [Fig. 3], [Video 1]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Large duodenal laterally spreading tumor.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Piecemeal cold snare resection of the laterally spreading tumor.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Prophylactic clip closure.

Video 1 Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection of a large duodenal laterally spreading tumor.


Quality:

The tumor was resected with a classic hexagonal pure cold snare in a piecemeal fashion. Minor intraprocedural bleeding was tolerated with a regular waterjet wash. Complete macroscopic removal was possible in 15 minutes, and the scar was closed with large hemostatic clips. No postprocedural complications occurred and no residual adenomas were detected at the 6-month follow-up gastroscopy.

Cold snare piecemeal resection could become a new standard of care for large duodenal adenomas [2], as this technique decreased the high risk of complications in this location (perforation, delayed bleeding, or postpolypectomy syndrome). A prospective observational Italian study is ongoing to evaluate this procedure for large duodenal adenomas (NCT04783961).

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AH_2AZ

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.

This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos



Publication History

Article published online:
01 July 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 van Hattem WA, Shahidi N, Vosko S. et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods. Gut 2021; 70: 1691-1697
  • 2 Ochiai Y, Kato M, Kiguchi Y. et al. Current status and challenges of endoscopic treatments for duodenal tumors. Digestion 2019; 99: 21-26