Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2022; 54(03): 171-176
DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-3925
Übersichtsartikel

Biomechanik: Was hat sich geändert?

Biomechanics: what has changed?
Carlalberta Verna
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Um die Effektivität kieferorthopädischer Behandlungen in Hinblick auf die Behandlungsdauer und die Ästhetik der verwendeten Apparaturen zu verbessern, sind unterschiedliche Geräte und Verfahren entwickelt worden.

Durch die Einführung der skelettalen Verankerung hat sich die biomechanische Effektivität deutlich verbessert. Bei Verfahren, welche die biologische Antwort des Patienten beeinflussen, scheint die Kortikotomie mit oder ohne Knochenaufbau und Weichgewebetransplantation eher in Bezug auf die Qualität, als auf die Geschwindigkeit von Zahnbewegungen am vielversprechendsten zu sein. Eine Finite Elemente-Studie konnte zeigen, dass sich eine Translationsbewegung nach der Veränderung der Knochendichte schneller und länger durchführen lässt. Im Zusammenhang mit unsichtbaren bzw. weniger sichtbaren Apparaturen ist die Biomechanik im Rahmen der Lingualtherapie bei der Kontrolle der Inklination der unteren Schneidezähne sowohl bei Jump Bite-Geräten und bei der Retraktion überlegen. Der Enthusiasmus, mit dem die Aligner-Therapie eingeführt worden ist, hat inzwischen nachgelassen. Es ist klar geworden, dass diese Art der Behandlung bei einigen Zahnbewegungen nicht die biomechanischen Vorteile bieten kann, die festsitzende Geräte auszeichnen. Für einfachere Zahnbewegungen sind sie jedoch geeignet und hier besonders bei der hybriden Behandlung, bei der die biomechanischen Vorteile festsitzender Geräte mit den ästhetischen Vorteilen der Aligner kombiniert werden.

Abstract

With the need to improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment in terms of treatment speed and appliance aesthetics, various appliances and approaches are introduced into the orthodontic landscape.

Biomechanical efficiency was improved through the introduction of skeletal anchorage. Among the techniques that tend to modify the patient's biological response, corticotomy, combined or not with bone and or soft tissue grafting, seems to be the most promising in term of quality rather than for speed of movement. A finite element study showed that by modifying bone density the translation movement tends to be expressed sooner and longer. Regarding the invisible or less visible techniques, the biomechanics of the lingual technique is advantageous for controlling the inclination of the lower incisors, both in the use of bite jumper appliances and during retraction. The enthusiasm with which aligner therapy has invaded the orthodontic scene is at the moment downplayed, as it is evident that for some movements this type of therapy does not offer the biomechanical advantages of fixed therapy, whereas it is indicated for simpler movements, but especially in hybrid therapy, which combines the biomechanical advantages of fixed therapy with the aesthetic advantages of aligner therapy.

Schlüsselwörter

Biomechanik - Kieferorthopädie - Regionally Accelerated Phenomenon (RAP) - Zahnbewegung

Key words

biomechanics - orthodontics - Regionally Accelerated Phenomenon (RAP) - tooth movement


Publication History

Article published online:
23 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Oxford English Dictionary. 3rd ed. . Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2022. s.v. “Biomechanics”.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC.. Meta analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res 2004; 7: 71-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Zamora-Martínez N, Paredes-Gallardo V, García-Sanz V, Gandía-Franco JL, Tarazona-Álvarez B.. Comparative study of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) between different types of orthodontic treatment. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57: 683
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A, El-Angbawi A, Pandis N.. Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: CD010572
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Maizeray R, Wagner D, Lefebvre F, Lévy-Bénichou H, Bolender Y.. Is there any difference between conventional, passive and active self-ligating brackets? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Orthod 2021; 19: 523-538
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hegele J, Seitz L, Claussen C, Uwe Baumert U, Sabbagh H, Andrea Wichelhaus A.. Clinical effects with customized brackets and CAD/CAM technology: a prospective controlled study. Prog Orthod 2021; 22: 40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Penning EW, Peerlings RHJ, Govers JDM, Rischen RJ, Zinad K, Bronkhorst EM, Breuning KH, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.. Orthodontics with customized versus noncustomized appliances: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 1498-1504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Dias da Silva MA, Walmsley AD.. Fake news and dental education. Br Dent J 2019; 226: 397-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Burstone CJ, Charles J, Burstone DDS, Part MS.. 2: Biomechanics. Interview by Dr. Nanda. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41: 139-147
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 El-Angbawi A, McIntyre GT, Fleming PS, Bearn DR.. Non-surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: CD010887
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Liu Y, Wu Y, Yang C, Song J, Fan Y.. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy facilitated orthodontic anterior retraction: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020; 23: 295-302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Al-Dboush R, Soltan R, Rao J, El-Bialy T.. Skeletal and dental effects of Herbst appliance anchored with temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022; 25: 31-48
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Verna C, Spena R, Dalstra M, Cattaneo PM, Ball JV.. Surgically assisted tooth movement: Biological application. In: Krishnan V, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Davidovitch Z (eds). Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Movement. 3rd ed.. John Wiley & Sons Inc; Newark, NJ: 2021: 238-264
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Jambi S, Walsh T, Sandler J, Benson PE, Skeggs RM, O'Brien KD.. Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014: CD005098
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Frost HM.. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1983; 31: 3-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Verna C.. Regional acceleratory phenomenon. Front Oral Biol 2016; 18: 28-35
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shahrin AA, Ghani SHA, Norman NH.. Effectiveness of microosteoperforations in accelerating alignment of maxillary anterior crowding in adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021; 160: 784-792
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Fu T, Liu S, Zhao H, Cao M, Zhang R.. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive orthodontic tooth movement acceleration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2019; 98: 1469-1479
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Gao J, Nguyen T, Oberoi S, Oh H, Kapila S, Kao RT, Lin GH.. The significance of utilizing a corticotomy on periodontal and orthodontic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biology (Basel) 2021; 10: 803
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Mheissen S, Khan H, Alsafadi AS, Almuzian M.. The effectiveness of surgical adjunctive procedures in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. J Orthod 2021; 48: 156-171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Eriksen EF.. Cellular mechanisms of bone remodeling. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2010; 11: 219-227
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M.. Corticotomy affects both the modus and magnitude of orthodontic tooth movement. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40: 107-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Alkadhimi A, Al-Moghrabi D, Fleming PS.. The nature and accuracy of Instagram posts concerning marketed orthodontic products. Angle Orthod 2022; 92: 247-254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Bock NC, Ruf S, Wiechmann D, Jilek T.. Herbst plus lingual versus Herbst plus labial: a comparison of occlusal outcome and gingival health. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 478-484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lombardo L, Scuzzo G, Arreghini A, Gorgun O, Ortan YO, Siciliani G.. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Weir T, Blundell HL, Gaddam R, Maree A.. Precautions with aligner treatment. In: Eliades T, Athanasiou AE (eds). Orthodontic Aligner Treatment. A Review of Materials, Clinical Management, and Evidence. G. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2021: 95-106
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Upadhyay M, Arqub SA.. Biomechanics of clear aligners: hidden truths & first principles. J World Fed Orthod 2022; 11: 12-21
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Jiang T, Wu RY, Wang JK, Wang HH, Tang GH.. Clear aligners for maxillary anterior en masse retraction: a 3D finite element study. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 10156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Papageorgiou SN, Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Peltomaki T, Eliades T.. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Eur J Orthod 2020; 42: 331-343
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Palone M, Cervinara F, Casella S, Siciliani G, Lombardo L.. Resolution of a complex malocclusion using a hybrid aligner approach. J Clin Orthod 2021; 55: 343-353
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Wilmes B, Schwarze J, Vasudavan S, Drescher D.. Combination of clear aligners and beneslider for correction of severe midline deviation. J Clin Orthod 2021; 55: 675-683
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Lin JC, Tsai SJ, Liou EJW, Bowman SJ.. Treatment of challenging malocclusions with Invisalign and miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48: 23-36
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Lou T, Tran J, Tassi A, Cioffi I.. Pain during orthodontic treatment: Biologic mechanisms and clinical management. In: Nanda R, Castroflorio T, Garino F, Ojima K (eds). Principles and Biomechanics of Aligner Treatment. Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA: 2021: 252-258
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kaklamanos EG, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE.. Aligner treatment from the patient perspective. In: Eliades T, Athanasiou AE (eds). Orthodontic Aligner Treatment. A Review of Materials, Clinical Management, and Evidence. G. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2021: 177-183
    Search in Google Scholar