Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2022; 54(03): 163-170
DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-3988
Übersichtsartikel

Korrektur eines Gummy Smile mit Hilfe einer Mini-Implantat-Verankerung – Direkte versus indirekte Verankerung

Correction of a Gummy Smile with the Help of Mini-Implant Anchorage – Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
Benedict Wilmes
1   Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
,
Dieter Drescher
1   Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstrakt

Das „Gummy Smile“ stellt für viele Patienten eine ästhetisch unbefriedigende Situation dar. In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden zwei Mechaniken mit skelettaler Verankerung (Direkt versus Indirekt) zur Intrusion von Oberkiefer-Frontzähnen vorgestellt, die insbesondere bei Vorliegen eines Tiefbisses eine empfehlenswerte Behandlungsoption darstellen. Um die Gefahr von Wurzelresorptionen zu minimieren, die insbesondere bei der Intrusion von Scheidezähnen präsent ist, sollten grundsätzlich nur kleine und konstante Kräfte appliziert werden.

Abstract

The “Gummy Smile” represents an esthetically unsatisfactory situation for many patients. In this review article, two mechanisms with skeletal anchorage (direct versus indirect) for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth are presented, which are a recommendable treatment option, especially in the presence of a deep bite. To minimize the risk of root resorption, which is particularly present in the intrusion of incisors, only small and constant forces should be applied.

Schlüsselwörter

Gummy Smile - Frontzahn-Intrusion - Tiefbiss - Mini-Implantate

Key words

gummy smile - incisor-intrusion - deep bite - mini-implants


Publication History

Article published online:
23 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Levine RA, McGuire M. The diagnosis and treatment of the gummy smile. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry 1997; 18: 757-762 764; quiz 766
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Monaco A, Streni O, Marci MC. et al. Gummy smile: clinical parameters useful for diagnosis and therapeutical approach. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 29: 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120: 98-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Khojasteh A, Mohaghegh S. Orthognathic Surgery for Management of Gummy Smile. Dent Clin North Am 2022; 66: 385-398
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Deliberador TM, Weiss SG, Neto ATD. et al. Guided Periodontal Surgery: Association of Digital Workflow and Piezosurgery for the Correction of a Gummy Smile. Case reports in dentistry 2020; 2020: 7923842
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Horn ROR, Joly JC. Treatment of Gummy Smile Combining Crown Lengthening, Lip Repositioning and The Use of Polyester Threads. Clin Adv Periodontics 2022;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Zengiski ACS, Basso IB, Cavalcante-Leao BL. et al. Effect and longevity of botulinum toxin in the treatment of gummy smile: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26: 109-117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Queiroz TP, Luvizuto ER, Marques DO. et al. Botulinum Toxin Injections as an Adjunct to Surgical Lip Repositioning For Gummy Smile Treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2022;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Santhosh Kumar S, Ramteke S, Madhan B. Botulinum toxin injection to treat a gummy smile: A few observations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021; 159: e199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lin JC, Yeh CL, Liou EJ. et al. Treatment of skeletal-origin gummy smiles with miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2008; 42: 285-296
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 1-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Vanden Bulcke MM, Dermaut LR, Sachdeva RC. et al. The center of resistance of anterior teeth during intrusion using the laser reflection technique and holographic interferometry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 211-220
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 van Steenbergen E, Burstone CJ, Prahl-Andersen B. et al. Influence of buccal segment size on prevention of side effects from incisor intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 658-665
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Wilmes B. Anwendungsgebiete von Mini-Implantaten. In: Ludwig B, Hrsg. Mini-Implantate in der Kieferorthopädie – Innovative Verankerungskonzepte. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2007: 89-120
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wehrbein H, Diedrich P. Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic load--an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993; 4: 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 763-767
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Wilmes B. Fields of Application of Mini-Implants. In: Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Bowman J, Hrsg. Innovative Anchorage Concepts Mini-Implants in Orthodontics. Berlin, New York: Quintessenz; 2008
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 2000; 3: 23-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM. et al. Micro-Implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35: 417-422
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Freudenthaler JW, Haas R, Bantleon HP. Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: a preliminary report on clinical applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 358-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage-preliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop 2004; 65: 410-418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wilmes B, Drescher D. Verankerung mit Miniimplantaten bei präprothetischer kieferorthopädischer Therapie. Kieferorthopädie 2006; 20: 203-208
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Ludwig BGT, Bowman J, Wilmes B, Kinzinger G, Lisson G. Anatomical Guidelines for Miniscrew Insertion: Palatal Sites. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 433-441
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wilmes B, Ludwig B, Vasudavan S. et al. The T-Zone: Median vs. Paramedian Insertion of Palatal Mini-Implants. J Clin Orthod 2016; 50: 543-551
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wilmes B, Bowman JS, Baumgaertel S. Fields of Application of Mini-Implants. In: Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Bowman JS, Hrsg. Mini-Implants in Orthodontics Innovative Anchorage Concepts. 1st. Aufl. London: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2008: 91-122
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW. et al. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 462-476 discussion 412A
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Topkara A, Karaman AI, Kau CH. Apical root resorption caused by orthodontic forces: A brief review and a long-term observation. European journal of dentistry 2012; 6: 445-453
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Orthodontic treatment and root resorption: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Orthod 2021; 43: 442-456
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Zhang X, Li MQ, Guo J. et al. An analysis of the optimal intrusion force of the maxillary central incisor with root horizontal resorption using the finite element method and curve fitting. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2021; 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar