Vaginal Birth at Term – Part 2. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020)

Abstract

Purpose This guideline aims to summarize the current state of knowledge about vaginal birth at term. The guideline focuses on definitions of the physiological stages of labor as well as differentiating between various pathological developments and conditions. It also assesses the need for intervention and the options to avoid interventions. The second part of this guideline presents recommendations and statements on care during the dilation and expulsion stages as well as during the placental/postnatal stage.

Methods The German recommendations largely reproduce the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG190 guideline “Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies”. Other international guidelines were also consulted in individual cases when compiling this guideline. In addition, a systematic search and analysis of the literature was carried out using PICO questions where necessary, and other systematic reviews and individual studies were taken into account. For easier comprehension, the assessment tools of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) were used to evaluate the quality of additionally consulted studies. Otherwise, the GRADE system was used for the NICE guideline, and the evidence reports of the IQWiG were used to evaluate the quality of the evidence.

Recommendations Recommendations and statements were formulated based on identified evidence and/or a structured consensus.

Key words

guideline - vaginal birth - delivery - term

Publication History

Received: 17 July 2022

Accepted after revision: 18 July 2022

Article published online:
03 November 2022

• References/Literatur

• 1 Kaiko RF, Foley KM, Grabinski PY. et al. Central nervous system excitatory effects of meperidine in cancer patients. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 180-185
• 2 Portz S, Schmidt M, Weitz M. Lying down after premature rupture of the membranes in term singleton pregnancies: an evidence-based recommendation?. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2016; 220: 200-206
• 3 National Institute for Health and Care-Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum Care. Care of healthy woman and their babies during childbirth. Clinical guideline [CG 190]. NICE CG190 National Collaborating Centre for Womenʼs and Childrenʼs Health; 2014. Accessed October 15, 2022 at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190
• 4 Hannah ME, Hodnett ED, Willan A. et al. Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: expectant management at home or in hospital? The TermPROM Study Group. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 533-538
• 5 Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL. et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1024-1029
• 6 Ezra Y, Michaelson-Cohen R, Abramov Y. et al. Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: when to induce labor?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115: 23-27
• 7 Jomeen J, Martin CR. The impact of clinical management type on maternal and neonatal outcome following pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 2002; 6: 3-9
• 8 Hagskog K, Nisell H, Sarman I. et al. Conservative ambulatory management of prelabor rupture of the membranes at term in nulliparous women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 765-769
• 9 Eriksson M, Ladfors L, Mattsson LA. et al. Warm tub bath during labor. A study of 1385 women with prelabor rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks of gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 642-644
• 10 Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL. et al. International multicenter term PROM study: evaluation of predictors of neonatal infection in infants born to patients with premature rupture of membranes at term. Premature Rupture of the Membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 635-639
• 11 Flenady V, King J. Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (03) CD001807
• 12 Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (01) CD005302
• 13 Saccone G, Berghella V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 627.e1-627.e9
• 14 Wojcieszek AM, Stock OM, Flenady V. Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10) CD001807
• 15 Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (01) CD005302
• 16 Kehl S, Hösli I, Pecks U. et al. Induction of Labour. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k, AWMF Registry No. 015-088, December 2020). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81: 870-895
• 17 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG). Definitionen der Geburtsphasen. IQWiG-Berichte – Nr. 517. 2017. Accessed October 16, 2022 at: https://www.iqwig.de/download/v16-01a_definitionen-der-geburtsphasen_rapid-report_v1-0.pdf
• 18 Lauzon L, Hodnett E. Antenatal education for self-diagnosis of the onset of active labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 1998 (02) CD000935
• 19 Maimburg RD, Vaeth M, Durr J. et al. Randomised trial of structured antenatal training sessions to improve the birth process. BJOG 2010; 117: 921-928
• 20 Paz-Pascual C, Pinedo IA, Grandes G. et al. Design and process of the EMA Cohort Study: the value of antenatal education in childbirth and breastfeeding. BMC Nurs 2008; 7: 5
• 21 Green JM, Spiby H, Hucknall C. et al. Converting policy into care: womenʼs satisfaction with the early labour telephone component of the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Labour. J Adv Nurs 2012; 68: 2218-2228
• 22 Janssen PA, Still DK, Klein MC. et al. Early labor assessment and support at home versus telephone triage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1463-1469
• 23 Weavers A, Nash K. Setting up a triage telephone line for women in early labour. British Journal of Midwifery 2012; 20: 333-338
• 24 Janssen PA, Iker CE, Carty EA. Early labour assessment and support at home: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 734-741
• 25 Hodnett ED, Stremler R, Willan AR. et al. Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 337: a1021
• 26 Smith CA, Collins CT, Crowther CA. Aromatherapy for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (07) CD009215
• 27 Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM. et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006 (04) CD003521
• 28 Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT. et al. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (12) CD009514
• 29 Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT. et al. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (02) CD009290
• 30 Parsons M, Bidewell J, Nagy S. Natural eating behavior in latent labor and its effect on outcomes in active labor. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006; 51: e1-e6
• 31 Cluett ER, Nikodem VC, McCandlish RE. et al. Immersion in water in pregnancy, labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (02) CD000111
• 32 Abukhalil I, Kilby M, Aiken J. et al. Can the frequency of vaginal examinations influence the duration of labour?. IJGO 1994; 46: 151
• 33 Ahlden S, Andersch B, Stigsson L. et al. Prediction of sepsis neonatorum following a full-term pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988; 25: 181-185
• 34 World Health Organization. Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. Lancet 1994; 343: 1399-1404
• 35 Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Partogram action line study: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 976-980
• 36 Pattinson RC, Howarth GR, Mdluli W. et al. Aggressive or expectant management of labour: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2003; 110: 457-461
• 37 Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 295-302
• 38 Ranta P, Spalding M, Kangas-Saarela T. et al. Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain–options of 1091 Finnish parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 60-66
• 39 Price DD, Harkins SW, Baker C. Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain. Pain 1987; 28: 297-307
• 40 Bonnel AM, Boureau F. Labor pain assessment: validity of a behavioral index. Pain 1985; 22: 81-90
• 41 Brown ST, Campbell D, Kurtz A. Characteristics of labor pain at two stages of cervical dilation. Pain 1989; 38: 289-295
• 42 Gross MM, Hecker H, Keirse MJ. An evaluation of pain and “fitness” during labor and its acceptability to women. Birth 2005; 32: 122-128
• 43 Beilin Y, Hossain S, Bodian CA. The numeric rating scale and labor epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1794-1798
• 44 Sittner B, Hudson DB, Grossman CC. et al. Adolescentsʼ perceptions of pain during labor. Clin Nurs Res 1998; 7: 82-93
• 45 Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M. et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191-1198
• 46 Wuitchik M, Bakal D, Lipshitz J. The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 35-42
• 47 Baker A, Ferguson SA, Roach GD. et al. Perceptions of labour pain by mothers and their attending midwives. J Adv Nurs 2001; 35: 171-179
• 48 Lowe NK, Roberts JE. The convergence between in-labor report and postpartum recall of parturition pain. Res Nurs Health 1988; 11: 11-21
• 49 Niven C, Gijsbers K. A study of labour pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19: 1347-1351
• 50 Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I. et al. Ethnic differences influence care giverʼs estimates of pain during labour. Pain 1999; 81: 299-305
• 51 Frigoletto jr. FD, Lieberman E, Lang JM. et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 745-750
• 52 Rogers R, Gilson GJ, Miller AC. et al. Active management of labor: does it make a difference?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 599-605
• 53 Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C. et al. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 906-912
• 54 Russell R, Reynolds F. Epidural infusion of low-dose bupivacaine and opioid in labour. Does reducing motor block increase the spontaneous delivery rate?. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 266-273
• 55 Simkin PP, OʼHara M. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S131-S159
• 56 Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Kelly MA. et al. Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 76-79
• 57 MacLennan AH, Cowther C, Derham R. Does the option to ambulate during spontaneous labour confer any advantage or disadvantage?. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine 1993; 3: 43-48
• 58 Flynn AM, Kelly J, Hollins G. et al. Ambulation in labour. Br Med J 1978; 2: 591-593
• 59 Molina FJ, Sola PA, Lopez E. et al. Pain in the first stage of labor: relationship with the patientʼs position. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 13: 98-103
• 60 Andrews CM, Chrzanowski M. Maternal position, labor, and comfort. Appl Nurs Res 1990; 3: 7-13
• 61 Cammu H, Van Eeckhout E. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 313-318
• 62 Lopez-Zeno JA, Peaceman AM, Adashek JA. et al. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 450-454
• 63 Cohen GR, OʼBrien WF, Lewis L. et al. A prospective randomized study of the aggressive management of early labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 1174-1177
• 64 Fraser WD, Turcot L, Krauss I. et al. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (02) CD000015
• 65 Cardozo L, Pearce JM. Oxytocin in active-phase abnormalities of labor: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 152-157
• 66 Bidgood KA, Steer PJ. A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentation of labour. 1. Obstetric outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 512-517
• 67 Blanch G, Lavender T, Walkinshaw S. et al. Dysfunctional labour: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 117-120
• 68 Merrill DC, Zlatnik FJ. Randomized, double-masked comparison of oxytocin dosage in induction and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 455-463
• 69 Jamal A, Kalantari R. High and low dose oxytocin in augmentation of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87: 6-8
• 70 Majoko F. Effectiveness and safety of high dose oxytocin for augmentation of labour in nulliparous women. Cent Afr J Med 2001; 47: 247-250
• 71 Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML. et al. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 234-238
• 72 Lazor LZ, Philipson EH, Ingardia CJ. et al. A randomized comparison of 15- and 40-minute dosing protocols for labor augmentation and induction. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 1009-1012
• 73 Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Ingemarsson I. et al. Augmentation of labour: does oxytocin titration to achieve preset active contraction area values produce better obstetric outcome?. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 15: 333-337
• 74 Cummiskey KC, Gall SA, Dawood MY. Pulsatile administration of oxytocin for augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 869-872
• 75 Xenakis EM, Langer O, Piper JM. et al. Low-dose versus high-dose oxytocin augmentation of labor–a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1874-1878
• 76 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Care in established first stage of labour. 2020. Accessed October 15, 2022 at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190
• 77 American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 693-711
• 78 Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW. et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1281-1287
• 79 Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM. et al. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (05) CD000331
• 80 Smyth RM, Alldred SK, Markham C. et al. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (01) CD006167
• 81 Ghi T, Eggebo T, Lees C. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 128-139
• 82 Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ. et al. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (05) CD002006
• 83 Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A. et al. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (03) CD009124
• 84 Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM. et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (06) CD006672
• 85 Magoga G, Saccone G, Al-Kouatly HB. et al. Warm perineal compresses during the second stage of labor for reducing perineal trauma: A meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 240: 93-98
• 86 Pierce-Williams RAM, Saccone G, Berghella V. Hands-on versus hands-off techniques for the prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34: 993-1001
• 87 Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G. et al. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (02) CD000081
• 88 Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M. et al. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 247: 94-100
• 89 Eogan M, Daly L, OʼConnell PR. et al. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?. BJOG 2006; 113: 190-194
• 90 Kalis V, Karbanova J, Horak M. et al. The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 103: 5-8
• 91 Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E. et al. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study. BJOG 2012; 119: 724-730
• 92 Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP. et al. High-dose vs. low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 296-304
• 93 Kenyon S, Tokumasu H, Dowswell T. et al. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (07) CD007201
• 94 Webb SS, Yates D, Manresa M. et al. Impact of subsequent birth and delivery mode for women with previous OASIS: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2017; 28: 507-514
• 95 Fynes M, Donnelly V, Behan M. et al. Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study. Lancet 1999; 354: 983-986
• 96 Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 724-726
• 97 Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G. et al. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 1034-1040
• 98 Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (05) CD000111
• 99 Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC. et al. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (11) CD003519
• 100 Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D. et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (02) CD007412
• 101 Adnan N, Conlan-Trant R, McCormick C. et al. Intramuscular versus intravenous oxytocin to prevent postpartum haemorrhage at vaginal delivery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2018; 362: k3546
• 102 Gallos ID, Papadopoulou A, Man R. et al. Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (12) CD011689
• 103 Aigmueller T, Bader W, Beilecke K. et al. Management of 3rd and 4th Degree Perineal Tears after Vaginal Birth. German Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF Registry No. 015/079, October 2014). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75: 137-144
• 104 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Früherkennung von Krankheiten bei Kindern (Kinder-Richtlinie) in der Fassung vom 18. Juni 2015, veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 18.08.2016 B1, zuletzt geändert am 14. Mai 2020, veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 29.05.2020 B6, in Kraft getreten am 25. März 2020.
• 105 Balogun OO, OʼSullivan EJ, McFadden A. et al. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (11) CD001688
• 106 Selbmann H, Eißner H, Warnke W. Qualitätssicherung in der Geburtshilfe. Materialien und Berichte. Gerlingen: Bleicher Verlag; 1989
• 107 Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIQ). Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr. 2017. Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Berlin: 2018. Accessed October 21, 2022 at: https://iqtig.org/downloads/auswertung/2017/16n1gebh/QSKH_16n1-GEBH_2017_BUAW_V02_2018-08-01.pdf
• 108 Dangel-Vogelsang B, Holthaus E, Kolleck B, Korporal J. Außerklinische Geburtshilfe in Hessen: Wie modern ist die Hebammen-Geburtshilfe?. Hamburg: E B Verlag; 1997
• 109 GKV Spitzenverband. Hebammenhilfevertrag. Anlage 3 Qualitätsvereinbarung zum Vertrag nach § 134a SGB V. Redaktionell angepasst am 01.04.2020 ed. 2015. Accessed October 16, 2022 at: https://www.gkv-spitzenverband.de/media/dokumente/krankenversicherung_1/ambulante_leistungen/hebammen/aktuelle_dokumente/15_Anhang_3.a_QM_zur_Anlage_3_QV_09-2017.pdf
• 110 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2009 16/1 – Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Göttingen: AQUA-Institut; 2010
• 111 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2011 16/1 – Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Göttingen: AQUA-Institut; 2012
• 112 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2013 16/1 – Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Göttingen: AQUA-Institut; 2014
• 113 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses Richtlinie zu planungsrelevanten Qualitätsindikatoren – plan. QI-RL. 2019. Accessed October 16, 2022 at: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3812/2019-06-20_PlanQI-RL_Veroeffentlichung-QI-akt-Bericht-2017.pdf
• 114 Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO). QSR – Verfahren. Entwicklung der Leistungsbereiche Vaginale Entbindung und Sectio Abschlussbericht. Berlin: Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK; 2016
• 115 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Perinatale Medizin. S1-Leitlinie 087-001: Empfehlungen für die strukturellen Voraussetzungen der perinatologischen Versorgung in Deutschland. 2015. Accessed October 15, 2022 at: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/087-001.html
• 116 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Safe midwifery staffing for maternity settings. NICE guideline [NG4]. 2015. Accessed October 16, 2022 at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng4/resources/safe-midwifery-staffing-for-maternity-settings-pdf-51040125637
• 117 Bazian Ltd.. Safe midwife staffing for maternity settings: The relationship between midwife staffing at a local level and maternal and neonatal outcomes, and factors affecting these requirements. London: Bazian Ltd. A report for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014. Accessed October 16, 2022 at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng4/resources/safe-midwifery-staffing-for-maternity-settings-pdf-51040125637
• 118 Tucker J, Parry G, Penney G. et al. Is midwife workload associated with quality of process of care (continuous electronic fetal monitoring [CEFM]) and neonatal outcome indicators? A prospective study in consultant-led labour wards in Scotland. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003; 17: 369-377
• 119 Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J. et al. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 640379