Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: The IOTA Concept

Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer; Dirk Timmerman; Markus Hoopmann

doi:10.1055/a-1912-5361

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultraschall Med 2022; 43(06): 550-569
DOI: 10.1055/a-1912-5361

Continuing Education

Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: The IOTA Concept

Beurteilung von Adnexbefunden: Das IOTA-Konzept

Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer

¹Department of prenatal medicine and gynecologic ultrasound, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland

,

Dirk Timmerman

²Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium

,

Markus Hoopmann

³Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Ovarian lesions have a wide range of sonomorphological features with numerous different underlying benign and malignant histologies. Based on the studies conducted by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group, ovarian masses can currently be reliably characterized by ultrasound. In the following article, we explain how to use the IOTA terms and definitions and we provide insight into how to safely triage patients with an ovarian mass.

Zusammenfassung

Ovarielle Raumforderungen haben ein breites Spektrum von sonomorphologischer Kriterien, denen zahlreiche verschiedene benigne und maligne Histologien zugrunde liegen. Auf der Grundlage der Studien der International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA)-Gruppe können diese zuverlässig mittels Ultraschall charakterisiert werden. Im folgenden Artikel erläutern wir die Verwendung der IOTA-Terminologie und -Definitionen und geben einen Einblick in die Triagierung von Patientinnen mit Ovarialbefunden.

Full Text

References

References
1 Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH. et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 500-505
2 Engelen MJA, Kos HE, Willemse PHB. et al. Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2006; 106: 589-598
3 Chan JK, Kapp DS, Shin JY. et al. Influence of the gynecologic oncologist on the survival of ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1342-1350
4 Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM. et al. O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology 2020; 294: 168-185
5 Timmerman D, Schwärzler P, Collins WP. et al. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: An analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999; 13: 11-16
6 Valentin L. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999; 14: 273-283
7 Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T. et al. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2021; 13: 107-130
8 Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D. et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 2010; 341: c6839
9 Ameye L, Timmerman D, Valentin L. et al. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 582-591
10 Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T. et al. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 8794-8801
11 Van Calster B, Van Hoorde K, Valentin L. et al. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ 2014; 349: g5920
12 Kaijser J, Sayasneh A, van Hoorde K. et al. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 449-462
13 Meys EMJ, Kaijser J, Kruitwagen RFPM. et al. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2016; 58: 17-29
14 Timmerman D, van Calster B, Testa A. et al. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 424-437
15 Araujo KG, Jales RM, Pereira PN. et al. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2017; 49: 778-783
16 Szubert S, Wojtowicz A, Moszynski R. et al. External validation of the IOTA ADNEX model performed by two independent gynecologic centers. Gynecologic Oncology 2016; 142: 490-495