RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-1931-1546
Der Mythos der 15°-Linksseitenlagerung zur Entlastung der Vena cava inferior
Left Lateral Positioning during Caesarean Section – Myth or Truth?
Abstract
Positioning the pregnant patient in her third trimester in a 15° left lateral tilt position with the rationale to reduce inferior vena cava (IVC) compression is a longstanding practice of both obstetric and anesthesia care. Recent data from MRI imaging studies have challenged this traditional dogma, since the IVC was found to remain compressed at a 15° angle, with a tilt of at least 30° necessary to provide a certain relief of the vessel. However, even the 15° tilt is regularly underestimated by visual judgement and improperly executed, but comes with several disadvantages without adding any benefit on fetal outcome. Current evidence supports all efforts to cease the dogma of a 15° left lateral position for its lack of effectiveness and instead put emphasis on proven measures, such as volume coloading and the timely administration of vasopressors.
Das Dogma der 15°-Linksseitenlagerung im geburtshilflichen Setting ist fester Bestandteil geburtshilflicher Praxis und Literatur sowie Teil aktueller Leitlinienempfehlungen – aber ist es auch sinnvoll?
-
Bei nahezu allen Schwangeren am Termin kommt es in Rückenlage zu einer Kompression der V. cava inferior, aber nicht der Aorta.
-
Anders als bei akuten Verschlüssen haben etwa 90% der Schwangeren wirksame Kollateralen über das Azygos-System gebildet, sodass die Kompression der VCI keine relevanten hämodynamischen Einschränkungen zur Folge hat.
-
Die traditionelle 15°-Linksseitenlagerung, die noch dazu im klinischen Alltag zur Durchführung der Sectio kaum durchführbar ist, führt nicht zu einer Entlastung der VCI, hierfür wären mindestens 30° notwendig, und es ist zu prüfen, ob eine Links- oder Rechtsseitenlage notwendig ist.
-
Seitenlagerungen zur Sectio werden häufig nicht korrekt durchgeführt, haben zahlreiche Nachteile und bringen keinen Vorteil für das fetale Outcome.
-
Nach aktueller Datenlage gibt es keinen Grund, an der 15°-Linksseitenlage in der geburtshilflichen Versorgung festzuhalten.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. November 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Kinsella SM, Lohmann G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 774-788
- 2 Tamás P, Szilágyi A, Jeges S. et al. Effects of maternal central hemodynamics on fetal heart rate patterns. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 711-714
- 3 Humphries A, Mirjalili SA, Tarr GP. et al. The effect of supine positioning on maternal hemodynamics during late pregnancy. J Matern Neonatal Med 2019; 32: 3923-3930
- 4 Humphries A, Mirjalili SA, Tarr GP. et al. Hemodynamic changes in women with symptoms of supine hypotensive syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 631-636
- 5 Crawford JS, Marilyn B, Davies P. Time and lateral tilt at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44: 477-484
- 6 Buley RJR, Downing JW, Brock-Utne JG. et al. Right versus left lateral tilt for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1977; 49: 1009-1015
- 7 Secher NJ, Arnsbo P, Andersen LH. et al. Measurements of cardiac stroke volume in various body positions in pregnancy and during caesarean section: A comparison between thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1979; 39: 569-576
- 8 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Caesarean section. 2011 Zugriff am 31. August 2022 unter: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192/chapter/Recommendations#procedural-aspects-of-caesarean-birth
- 9 Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology [Anonym]. 2016; 124: 270-300 Zugriff am 31. August 2022 unter: https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/124/2/270/12693/Practice-Guidelines-for-Obstetric-AnesthesiaAn
- 10 Higuchi H, Takagi S, Zhang K. et al. Effect of lateral tilt angle on the volume of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava in pregnant and nonpregnant women determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 286-293
- 11 Fujita N, Higuchi H, Sakuma S. et al. Effect of right-lateral versus left-lateral tilt position on compression of the inferior vena cava in pregnant women determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 2019; 128: 1217-1222
- 12 Lee AJ, Landau R, Mattingly JL. et al. Left lateral table tilt for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia has no effect on neonatal acid-base status: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2017; 127: 241-249
- 13 Liu T, Zou S, Guo L. et al. Effect of different positions during surgical preparation with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2021; 133: 1235-1243
- 14 Jones SJ, Kinsella SM, Donald FA. Comparison of measured and estimated angles of table tilt at Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 86-87
- 15 Aust H, Koehler S, Kuehnert M. et al. Guideline-recommended 15° left lateral table tilt during cesarean section in regional anesthesia – practical aspects: An observational study. J Clin Anesth 2016; 32: 47-53
- 16 Roy S, Levine AB, Herbison GJ. et al. Intraoperative positioning during cesarean as a cause of sciatic neuropathy. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 652-653
- 17 Postaci A, Karabeyoglu I, Erdogan G. et al. A case of sciatic neuropathy after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 317-319