Leveraging and Improving Refill Protocols at Your Health System

Abstract

Objectives Medication refill processing is a repetitive and predictable time-intensive task for ambulatory primary and specialty care. Refill protocols are a clinical decision support (CDS) tool that allows clinicians to quickly and safely determine appropriateness of a refill request. Our health system opted to improve the quality and breadth of electronic health record vendor-supplied protocols to consistently leverage best practices and emerging evidence and to create novel protocols that further support clinicians.

Methods We established a refill protocol governance group to guide new protocol build and to review existing protocols regularly to keep current with emerging guidelines. Data-driven prioritization was used to create new protocols for the most frequently refilled medications, as well as for less-prescribed but higher risk medications. Ad-hoc specialist inclusion as subject-matter experts provided greater detail, accuracy, and broader consensus in protocol criteria.

Results Approximately 11 million refills are processed each year by our health system's providers. The proportion of refill requests supported by a protocol increased over a 2-year period from 49 to 82%, representing a net increase of 3.63 million refills in the second measurement year as compared to the start of the first measurement year. All published refill protocols were reviewed by the governance group over the measurement years for compliance with clinical guidelines. In addition to the structure of the refill protocols' CDS, the process was supported by filters that enable practices to quickly approve refills that pass protocol, providing more time for clinicians to review refills that fail a protocol or for which no protocol exists.

Conclusion A refill protocol is a valuable CDS tool that can improve efficiency, effectiveness, and user satisfaction when processing refill requests. A refill protocol governance structure is an effective way to review, edit, and build refill protocols within a health system.

Keywords

primary care - prescription - electronic health record - protocols - clinical decision support

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human subjects were involved in this project.

Publication History

Received: 28 January 2022

Accepted: 23 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 September 2022

Article published online:
09 November 2022

• References

• 1 Ferrell CW, Aspy CB, Mold JW. Management of prescription refills in primary care: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19 (01) 31-38
• 2 Bryan TN. A comprehensive prescription renewal solution: meet Charlie for refill management. Accessed November 11, 2021 at: https://www.healthcatalyst.com/insights/charlie-refill-management-prescription-renewal-solution/
• 3 Emont S. Putting prescription refill automation tech to the test in the safety net. Accessed November 11, 2021 at: https://www.chcf.org/blog/putting-refill-automation-tech-to-the-test-in-the-safety-net/
• 4 Baron RJ. What's keeping us so busy in primary care? A snapshot from one practice. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (17) 1632-1636
• 5 Gawande A. The checklist. Accessed March 2, 2021 at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/12/10/the-checklist
• 6 Escobedo J. Rethinking refills. Fam Pract Manag 2002; 9 (09) 55-56
• 7 Guirguis-Blake J, Keppel GA, Force RW, Cauffield J, Monger RM, Baldwin LM. Variation in refill protocols and procedures in a family medicine residency network. Fam Med 2012; 44 (08) 564-568
• 8 Prescribers' Digital Reference. Accessed November 2, 2021 at: https://www.pdr.net/
• 9 epocrates. Accessed November 2, 2021 at: https://www.epocrates.com/
• 10 QuickStats: Management of Patient Health Information Functions* Among Office-Based Physicians With and Without a Certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) System^† - National Electronic Health Records Survey, United States, 2018. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69 (38) 1381
• 11 HealthIT.gov. Accessed December 3, 2021 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/clinical-decision-support
• 12 Penn Medicine. Penn medicine facts & figures. 2021. Accessed October 3, 2022 at: https://www.med.upenn.edu/radiationoncologymedicalresidency/assets/user-content/documents/Penn%20Medicine%20Facts%20and%20Figures%202021%20Brochure.pdf
• 13 DeSantis A, Nathan DM, Mulder JE. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Accessed November 2, 2021 at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/sodium-glucose-co-transporter-2-inhibitors-for-the-treatment-of-hyperglycemia-in-type-2-diabetes-mellitus?search=Sodium-glucose%20co-transporter%202%20inhibitors&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~100&usage_type=default&display_rank=1#H4130796457
• 14 Nelson SD, Rector HH, Brashear D. et al. Rebuilding the standing prescription renewal orders. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 77-86
• 15 Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R. et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (01) 29-43
• 16 Sinsky C, Rajcevich E. Team-based care; improve patient care and team engagement through collaboration and streamlined processes. Accessed December 11, 2021 at: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2702513
• 17 Leubner J, Wild S. Developing standing orders to help your team work to the highest level. Fam Pract Manag 2018; 25 (03) 13-16