Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2023; 148(02): 134-139
DOI: 10.1055/a-1956-3642
Original Article

The Analgesic Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Meta-Analysis

Die analgetische Wirksamkeit von intraperitonealem Ropivacain gegenüber Bupivacain bei laparoskopischer Cholezystektomie: eine Meta-Analyse
Tao Xu
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China (Ringgold ID: RIN159403)
,
Buhuai Dong
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China (Ringgold ID: RIN159403)
,
Xucai Wu
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China (Ringgold ID: RIN159403)
,
Chuan Shi
2   Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China (Ringgold ID: RIN159403)
,
Liangku Huang
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China (Ringgold ID: RIN159403)
,
Li Zhou
3   Anesthesiology Management, chongqing nanan hospital, chongqing, China
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction This meta-analysis aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through January 2020 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results Five RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. In patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ropivacaine and bupivacaine demonstrated comparable pain scores at 2 h (SMD = –0.22; 95% CI = –0.54 to 0.10; p = 0.18), 4 h (SMD = –0.16; 95% CI = –0.42 to 0.10; p = 0.22), 8 h (SMD = –0.60; 95% CI = –1.19 to –0.01; p = 0.05), and 24 h (SMD = 0.33; 95% CI = –1.19 to 1.84; p = 0.67), as well as time to first analgesic requirement (SMD = 0.10; 95% CI = –0.23 to 0.42; p = 0.56).

Conclusions Intraperitoneal ropivacaine and bupivacaine have a similar analgesic efficacy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Ziel dieser Meta-Analyse war der Vergleich der analgetischen Wirksamkeit von intraperitonealem Ropivacain gegenüber Bupivacain bei der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie.

Methoden Wir durchsuchten PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, und Cochrane Library Datenbanken im Januar 2020 und schlossen randomisierte kontrollierte Studien (RCTs), die die analgetische Wirksamkeit von Ropivacain gegenüber Bupivacain bei der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie untersuchten mit ein.

Ergebnisse Fünf RCTs wurden in die Meta-Analyse einbezogen. Bei Patienten mit laparoskopischer Cholezystektomie zeigten Ropivacain und Bupivacain vergleichbare Schmerzwerte nach 2 h (SMD = –0,22; 95% CI = –0,54 bis 0,10; p = 0,18), 4 h (SMD = –0,16; 95% CI = –0,42 bis 0,10; p = 0,22), 8 h (SMD = –0,60; 95% CI = –1,19 bis –0,01; p = 0,05), und 24 h (SMD = 0,33; 95% CI = –1,19 bis 1,84; p = 0,67), sowie die Zeit bis zum ersten Analgetika (SMD = 0,10; 95% CI = –0,23 to 0,42; p = 0,56).

Schlussfolgerungen Intraperitoneales Ropivacain und Bupivacain haben eine ähnliche analgetische Wirksamkeit bei der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie.

Schlüsselwörter

endovaskuläre Therapie - interventionelle Endoskopie - minimal residual disease

Keywords

endoscopic surgery - laparoscopic surgery - liver surgery


Publication History

Received: 27 November 2021

Accepted after revision: 23 September 2022

Article published online:
05 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Bueno Lledó J, Granero Castro P, Gomez I Gavara I. et al. Twenty-five years of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cir Esp 2016; 94: 429-441
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Zanghì G, Leanza V, Vecchio R. et al. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature. G Chir 2015; 36: 243-246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Alexander HC, Nguyen CH, Moore MR. et al. Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 2061-2071
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 John R, Shariei F, Kaplan J. et al. (140) The Effect of Multimodal Preoperative Pain Management on Post-Operative Anesthesia Care Unit Opioid Requirements in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies. J Pain 2019; 20: S11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Karaca O, Pınar HU, Turk E. et al. Effects of single-dose preemptive pregabalin and intravenous ibuprofen on postoperative opioid consumption and acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Invest Surg 2019; 32: 189-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wu L, Wu L, Sun H. et al. Effect of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks of the abdominal wall on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Pain Res 2019; 12: 1433-1439
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sedaghat N, Cao AM, Eslick GD. et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 673-679
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wood S, Lewis W, Egan R. Optimising Surgical Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Review of Intraoperative Interventions. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23: 1925-1932
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 AlKhlaiwy O, AlMuhsin AM, Zakarneh E. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis: Case report with review of techniques. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 59: 208-212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Wei X, Yao X. The Impact of Intraperitoneal Levobupivacaine on Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30: 1-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Qiu J, Xie M, Qu R. The Influence of Etoricoxib on Pain Control for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29: 150-154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cervero F, Laird JM. Visceral pain. Lancet 1999; 353: 2145-2148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 McColl L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992; 74: 231
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhang X. Effect of pre-emptive pregabalin on pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 44: 122-127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Chen C, Tao R. The Impact of Magnesium Sulfate on Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28: 349-353
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Meena RK, Meena K, Loha S. et al. A comparative study of intraperitoneal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. APIC 2019; 20: 295-302
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kucuk C, Kadiogullari N, Canoler O. et al. A placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine instillation for preventing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 2007; 37: 396-400
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Sharan R, Singh M, Kataria AP. et al. Intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Essays Res 2018; 12: 377-380
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Das NT, Deshpande C. Effects of intraperitoneal local anaesthetics bupivacaine and ropivacaine versus placebo on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised double blind study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: UC08-UC12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Protic M, Veljkovic R, Bilchik AJ. et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing standard analgesia with combined intra-operative cystic plate and port-site local anesthesia for post-operative pain management in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 704-713
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Higgins JPTGreen S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 982-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Sharma CS, Singh M, Rautela RS. et al. Comparison of intraperitoneal and periportal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. APIC 2019; 18: 350-354
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Babu R, Jain P, Sherif L. Intraperitoneal instillation: Ropivacaine vs. bupivacaine for post operative pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Health Sci Res 2013; 3: 42-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 84-96
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Li S, Guo J, Li F. et al. Pregabalin can decrease acute pain and morphine consumption in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e6982
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Pappas-Gogos G, Tsimogiannis KE, Zikos N. et al. Preincisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine plus normal saline infusion for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2036-2045
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Zhang Y, He B, Zhao J. et al. Addition of Celebrex and Pregabalin to Ropivacaine for Posterior Spinal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2021; 15: 735-742
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bisgaard T. Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 835-846
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Louizos AA, Hadzilia SJ, Leandros E. et al. Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of preincisional infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1503-1506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Soop M. et al. Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic in abdominal surgery – a systematic review. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81: 237-245
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Dony P, Dewinde V, Vanderick B. et al. The comparative toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equipotent doses in rats. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1489-1492
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar