Nonoperative Treatment of Single-Tendon Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Recreational Athletes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of those patients who underwent nonoperative management of a single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsion. A retrospective case series of consecutive patients with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of single-tendon proximal hamstring avulsion treated nonoperatively with at least one year of follow-up was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including SF-12v2, Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Hip Outcome Score-activities of daily living and sport subscale (HOS-ADL, HOS-SS) were prospectively collected. Objective measurements included strength testing of the affected and unaffected limbs with a handheld dynamometer and single-leg hop test. Student’s t-tests were used to determine differences between limbs. Eleven of fourteen patients were available for PROMs (79%); five completed functional testing. Subjective scores revealed a mean SF-12v2 mental component score of 56.53±8.2, and a physical component score of 50.1±12.7. LEFS was 84%±19.8, HOS-ADL 87.9%±17.2, and HOS-SS 80.9%±24. The differences between limbs were not statistically significant for strength at 45 or 90 degrees of knee flexion, nor for single-leg hop distance. Patients in a non-professional athlete population who undergo nonoperative management of single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsions can expect good subjective and objective outcomes.

Key words

hamstring ruptures - single-tendon - nonoperative treatment

Publication History

Received: 16 June 2022
Received: 04 November 2022

Accepted: 16 November 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 December 2022

Article published online:
04 July 2023

• References

• 1 Ahmad CS, Redler LH, Ciccotti MG. et al. Evaluation and management of hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 2933-2947 DOI: 10.1177/0363546513487063.
• 2 Ali K, Leland JM. Hamstring strains and tears in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 2012; 31: 263-272 DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2011.11.001.
• 3 Arner JW, McClincy MP, Bradley JP. Hamstring injuries in athletes: evidence-based treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27: 868-877 DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00741.
• 4 Cohen S, Bradley J. Acute proximal hamstring rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15: 350-355 DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200706000-00004.
• 5 Forlizzi JM, Nacca CR, Shah SS. et al. Acute proximal hamstring tears can be defined using an image-based classification. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; e1-e7 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.007.
• 6 Degen RM. Proximal hamstring injuries: management of tendinopathy and avulsion injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12: 138-146 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-019-09541-x.
• 7 Hofmann KJ, Paggi A, Connors D. et al. Complete avulsion of the proximal hamstring insertion: functional outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1022-1025 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01074.
• 8 Cohen SB, Rangavajjula A, Vyas D. et al. Functional results and outcomes after repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40: 2092-2098 DOI: 10.1177/0363546512456012.
• 9 Shambaugh BC, Wuerz TH, Miller SL. Does time from injury to surgery affect outcomes after surgical repair of partial and complete proximal hamstring ruptures. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8: 2325967120946317 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120946317.
• 10 Bodendorfer BM, Curley AJ, Kotler JA. et al. Outcomes after operative and nonoperative treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46: 2798-2808 DOI: 10.1177/0363546517732526.
• 11 Chang JS, Kayani B, Plastow R. et al. Management of hamstring injuries: current concepts review. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B: 1281-1288 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2020-1210.R1.
• 12 Piposar JR, Vinod AV, Olsen JR. et al. High-grade partial and retracted (<2 cm) proximal hamstring ruptures: nonsurgical treatment revisited. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5: 2325967117692507 DOI: 10.1177/2325967117692507.
• 13 Pihl E, Skoldenberg O, Nasell H. et al. Patient-reported outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions in middle-aged patients. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2019; 5: e000511 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000511.
• 14 van der Made AD, Peters RW, Verheul C. et al. Proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: comparable clinical outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment at 1-year follow-up using a shared decision-making model. Br J Sports Med 2022; 56: 340-348 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104588.
• 15 Ayuob A, Kayani B, Haddad FS. Acute surgical repair of complete, nonavulsion proximal semimembranosus injuries in professional athletes. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48: 2170-2177 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520934467.
• 16 Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA. et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 371-383
• 17 Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220-233 DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
• 18 Nwachukwu BU, Beck EC, Kunze KN. et al. Defining the clinically meaningful outcomes for arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome at minimum 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48: 901-907 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520902736.
• 19 Shambaugh BC, Olsen JR, Lacerte E. et al. A comparison of nonoperative and operative treatment of complete proximal hamstring ruptures. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5: 2325967117738551 DOI: 10.1177/2325967117738551.