Die implantatprothetische Rehabilitation von Tumorpatienten unter Berücksichtigung digitaler Operationsplanungsmethoden

Die digitale Implantatplanung kann auch bei der oralen Rehabilitation von Tumorpatienten zu besseren Ergebnissen führen bzw. eine Rehabilitation erst ermöglichen. Der vorliegende Artikel hat die Zielsetzung zu evaluieren, ob die digitale Implantatplanung bei der Rehabilitation von Tumorpatienten anwendbar ist und Vorteile im Vergleich zur konventionellen Implantatplanung bei der Versorgung entstehen.

• Literatur

• 1 Lippman SM. Epidemiology biology and chemoprevention of aerodigestive cancer. Cancer 1994; 74: 2719-2735
• 2 Howaldt HP, Vorast H, Blecher JC. et al. Results of the DOSAK tumor register. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2000; 4 (Suppl. 01) S216-S225
• 3 Wolff KD, Follmann M, Nast A. The diagnosis and treatment of oral cavity cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 829-835
• 4 AWMF, Deutsche Krebshilfe. S3 Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie des Mundhöhlenkarzinoms, Langversion 3.0. AWMF Registernummer: 007/100OL. 2021 https://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/mundhoehlenkarzinom
• 5 Talamini R, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C. et al. Combined effect of tobacco and alcohol on laryngeal cancer risk: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 2002; 13: 957-964
• 6 Rodgers jr. LW, Stringer SP, Mendenhall WM. et al. Management of squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of mouth. Head Neck 1993; 15: 16-19
• 7 Chawla S, Mohanti BK, Rakshak M. et al. Temporal assessment of quality of life of head and neck cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 73-78
• 8 Komisar A. The functional result of mandibular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 364-374
• 9 Lovisa MM, Weischer T, Schettler D. Grenzen der Versorgung des Unterkiefers nach Tumorresektion unter Einbeziehung enossaler Implantate. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49: 85-87
• 10 Marx RE, Johnson RP. Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradionecrosis and their clinical significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64: 379-390
• 11 Görtz KA. Kaufunktionelle und orofaziale Rehabilitation nach tumor-therapeutischer Kopf-Hals-Bestrahlung. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2001; 222-239
• 12 Nahles S, Sachse C, Wagendorf O. et al. Implantatprothetische Rehabilitation von Patienten nach Tumortherapie im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. MKG-Chirurg 2021; 14: 212-220
• 13 Blank J, Hanning C. Orale Folgen von Bestrahlung im Kopf-Hals-Bereich und ihre Bedeutung für die Nachsorge. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2020; 75: 281-302
• 14 Schoen PJ, Raghoebar GM, Bouma J. et al. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of oral function in head-neck cancer patients with dental implants placed simultaneously during ablative tumour surgery: an assessment of treatment outcomes and quality of life. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 8-16
• 15 Meloni SM, Tallarico M, De Riu G. et al. Guided implant surgery after free-flap reconstruction: Four-year results from a prospective clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43: 1348-1355
• 16 Ochandiano S, Garcia-Mato D, Gonzalez-Alvarez A. et al. Computer-Assisted Dental Implant Placement Following Free Flap Reconstruction: Virtual Planning, CAD/CAM Templates, Dynamic Navigation and Augmented Reality. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 754943
• 17 Ravida A, Barootchi S, Tattan M. et al. Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of computer-guided versus conventional implant-retained hybrid prostheses: A long-term retrospective analysis of treatment protocols. J Periodontol 2018; 89: 1015-1024
• 18 Jackowski J, Peters H, Hölzle F. Zahnärztliche Chirurgie. Berlin: Springer; 2017
• 19 Tetsch P. Enossale Implantationen in der Zahnheilkunde. München, Wien: Carl Hanser; 1992
• 20 Besimo CE, Graber G, Lambrecht J. Bildgebende Verfahren zur prächirurgischen-prothetischen Planung implantatgetragener Suprastrukturen. Implantologie 1995; 193
• 21 Besimo C. Abnehmbarer Zahnersatz auf osseointegrierten Implantaten. Planungs- und Konstruktionsprinzipien für den zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Berlin: Quintessenz; 1994
• 22 Adler L, Buhlin K, Jansson L. Survival and complications: A 9- to 15-year retrospective follow-up of dental implant therapy. J Oral Rehabil 2020; 47: 67-77
• 23 Abdelhay N, Prasad S, Gibson MP. Failure rates associated with guided versus non-guided dental implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BDJ Open 2021; 7: 31
• 24 Ide Y, Matsunaga S, Harris J. et al. Anatomical examination of the fibula: digital imaging study for osseointegrated implant installation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 44: 1
• 25 Flügge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J. et al. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans – A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1113-1118
• 26 Rugani P, Kirnbauer B, Arnetzl GV. et al. Cone beam computerized tomography: basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 131-145
• 27 O’Connor Esteban M, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho A. et al. Influence of the Digital Mock-Up and Experience on the Ability to Determine the Prosthetically Correct Dental Implant Position during Digital Planning: An In Vitro Study. J Clin Med 2019; 9: 48
• 28 Schnutenhaus S, Gröller S, Luthardt RG. et al. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018; 20: 541-549
• 29 Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Marqués-Guasch J. et al. Fully Guided Versus Half-Guided and Freehand Implant Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2020; 35: 1159-1169
• 30 Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O. et al. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat 2019; 225: 1-10
• 31 Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A. et al. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 31: 539-547
• 32 Schneider D, Sax C, Sancho-Puchades M. et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant placement compared with conventional implant placement by hand-An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32: 1052-1060
• 33 Ku JK, Lee J, Lee HJ. et al. Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22: 8
• 34 Koga DH, Salvajoli JV, Alves FA. Dental extractions and radiotherapy in head and neck oncology: review of the literature. Oral Dis 2008; 14: 40-44
• 35 Dholam KP, Gurav SV. Dental implants in irradiated jaws: a literature review. J Cancer Res Ther 2012; 8 (Suppl. 01) S85-S93
• 36 Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M. et al. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl. 04) 73-86
• 37 Kaeppler G. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental and oral medicine. Int J Comput Dent 2010; 13: 203-219
• 38 Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Jacobs R. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44: 213-220
• 39 Wilde F, Cornelius CP, Schramm A. Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction using a Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plate Fabricated with Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Techniques. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014; 7: 158-166
• 40 Patel SY, Kim DD, Ghali GE. Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Vascularized Fibula Free Flaps and Endosseous Implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 31: 259-284
• 41 Berryman DR. Augmented reality: a review. Med Ref Serv Q 2012; 31: 212-218
• 42 Pellegrino G, Mangano C, Mangano R. et al. Augmented reality for dental implantology: a pilot clinical report of two cases. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 158
• 43 Stanford C, Estafanous E, Ellingsen JE. et al. Radiotherapy and oral Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 745-747