Häufige Herausforderungen bei randomisiert kontrollierten Psychotherapie-Wirksamkeitsvergleichsstudien

• Literatur

• 1 Smith ML, Glass VG.. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. Am Psychol 1977; 32: 752-760
• 2 Wampold BE, Imel ZE, Flückiger C.. Die Psychotherapie-Debatte – Was Psychotherapie wirksam macht. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2020
• 3 Elkin I.. The NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: Where we began and where we are. In AE Bergin, SL Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977: 114-139
• 4 Owen J, Drinane JM, Idigo KC, Valentine JC.. Psychotherapist effects in meta- analyses: How accurate are treatment effects?. Psychoth 2015; 52: 321-328
• 5 Kazantzis N, Whittington C, Zelencich L. et al. Quantity and quality of homework compliance: A meta-analysis of relations with outcome in cognitive behavior therapy. Behav Ther 2016; 47: 755-772
• 6 Furukawa TA, Suganuma A, Ostinelli EG. et al. Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta- analysis using individual participant data. The Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8: 500-511
• 7 Flückiger C, Del ReAC.. Do some theory-specific psychotherapies outperform others? In FTL Leong. Handbook of Psychotherapy. Washington: APA; 2023