Identifying a Clinical Informatics or Electronic Health Record Expert Witness for Medical Professional Liability Cases

Abstract

Background The health care field is experiencing widespread electronic health record (EHR) adoption. New medical professional liability (i.e., malpractice) cases will likely involve the review of data extracted from EHRs as well as EHR workflows, audit logs, and even the potential role of the EHR in causing harm.

Objectives Reviewing printed versions of a patient's EHRs can be difficult due to differences in printed versus on-screen presentations, redundancies, and the way printouts are often grouped by document or information type rather than chronologically. Simply recreating an accurate timeline often requires experts with training and experience in designing, developing, using, and reviewing EHRs and audit logs. Additional expertise is required if questions arise about data's meaning, completeness, accuracy, and timeliness or ways that the EHR's user interface or automated clinical decision support tools may have contributed to alleged events. Such experts often come from the sociotechnical field of clinical informatics that studies the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of information and communications technology, specifically, EHRs. Identifying well-qualified EHR experts to aid a legal team is challenging.

Methods Based on literature review and experience reviewing cases, we identified seven criteria to help in this assessment.

Results The criteria are education in clinical informatics; clinical informatics knowledge; experience with EHR design, development, implementation, and use; communication skills; academic publications on clinical informatics; clinical informatics certification; and membership in informatics-related professional organizations.

Conclusion While none of these criteria are essential, understanding the breadth and depth of an individual's qualifications in each of these areas can help identify a high-quality, clinical informatics expert witness.

Keywords

medical informatics - malpractice - expert testimony - electronic health records - education

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

None.

Publication History

Received: 20 October 2022

Accepted: 21 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
27 January 2023

Article published online:
22 March 2023

• References

• 1 Abramson EL, McGinnis S, Moore J, Kaushal R. HITEC investigators. A statewide assessment of electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among nursing homes. Health Serv Res 2014; 49 (1 Pt 2): 361-372
• 2 Abramson EL, Edwards A, Silver M, Kaushai R. HITEC investigators. Trending health information technology adoption among New York nursing homes. Am J Manag Care 2014; 20 (11 Spec No. 17): eSP53-eSP59
• 3 Vest JR, Jung HY, Wiley Jr K, Kooreman H, Pettit L, Unruh MA. Adoption of health information technology among US nursing facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 20 (08) 995-1000 .e4
• 4 Health IT. gov. Certification Standards and Regulations. Accessed July 18, 2022 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/certification-ehrs/certification-standards-and-regulations
• 5 Koppel R, Lehmann CU. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (02) 465-471
• 6 Kulikowski CA, Shortliffe EH, Currie LM. et al. AMIA Board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (06) 931-938
• 7 Gardner RM, Overhage JM, Steen EB. et al; AMIA Board of Directors. Core content for the subspecialty of clinical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (02) 153-157
• 8 Federal Rule 702. Testimony by Expert Witnesses. Accessed December 30, 2022 at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702
• 9 Wechsler HJ, Kehn A, Wise RA, Cramer RJ. Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility. Int J Law Psychiatry 2015; 41: 58-66
• 10 Blinka DD. Expert testimony and the relevancy rule in the Age of Daubert. Marq L Rev 2006; 90: 173
• 11 Miller RA, Shortliffe EH. The roles of the US National Library of Medicine and Donald A.B. Lindberg in revolutionizing biomedical and health informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (12) 2728-2737 Erratum in: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):1025. PMID: 34741510; PMCID: PMC8633636
• 12 National Library of Medicine (NLM). NLM's University-based Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training Programs. Accessed February 8, 2023 at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/ep/GrantTrainInstitute.html
• 13 Greenes RA, Florance V, Miller RA. Don Lindberg's Influence on Future Generations: The U.S. National Library of Medicine's Biomedical Informatics Research Training Programs. Stud Health Technol Inform 2022; 288: 43-50
• 14 Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics and Information Management Education (CAHIIM). Accredited Health Informatics Master's Degree Programs. Accessed December 29, 2022 at: https://www.cahiim.org/programs/program-directory
• 15 Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (Suppl 3, Suppl 3): i68-i74
• 16 Silverman HD, Steen EB, Carpenito JN, Ondrula CJ, Williamson JJ, Fridsma DB. Domains, tasks, and knowledge for clinical informatics subspecialty practice: results of a practice analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (07) 586-593
• 17 Sinha A, Stevens LA, Su F, Pageler NM, Tawfik DS. Measuring electronic health record use in the pediatric ICU using audit-logs and screen recordings. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (04) 737-744
• 18 United States Court of Appeals. Fourth Circuit. LOWE v. CERNER CORPORATION, (1:19 − cv − 00625 − CMH − TCB); November 29, 2022. Accessed December 29, 2022 at: https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/202270.U.pdf
• 19 Sittig DF. Clinical Informatics Literacy: 5000 Concepts Every Informatician Should Know. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2017
• 20 Palla G, Tibély G, Mones E, Pollner P, Vicsek T. Hierarchical networks of scientific journals. Palgrave Commun 2015; 1: 15016 Accessed September 17, 2022 at:
• 21 Google Scholar Top Publications. Accessed September 19, 2022 at: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en
• 22 List of Journals currently indexed in MEDLINE. Accessed December 29, 2022 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/?term=currentlyindexed%5BAll+Fields%5D+AND+currentlyindexedelectronic%5BAll+Fields%5D
• 23 Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012; 489 (7415): 179
• 24 Ioannidis JP, Klavans R, Boyack KW. Multiple citation indicators and their composite across scientific disciplines. PLoS Biol 2016; 14 (07) e1002501
• 25 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals. Updated May 2022. Accessed December 11, 2022 at: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.
• 26 McCoy AB, Sittig DF, Lin J, Wright A. Identification and ranking of biomedical informatics researcher citation statistics through a Google Scholar Scraper. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020; 2019: 655-663
• 27 Halevi G, Nicolas B, Bar-Ilan J. The complexity of measuring the impact of books. Publ Res Q 2016; 32 (03) 187-200
• 28 Ioannidis JPA, Boyack KW, Baas J. Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators. PLoS Biol 2020; 18 (10) e3000918
• 29 Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46) 16569-16572
• 30 Radvansky BM, Farver WT, Svider PF, Eloy JA, Gubenko YA, Eloy JD. A comparison of plaintiff and defense expert witness qualifications in malpractice litigation in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg 2015; 120 (06) 1369-1374
• 31 Park HY, Zoller SD, Sheppard WL. et al. A comparison of defense and plaintiff expert witnesses in orthopaedic surgery malpractice litigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (11) e78
• 32 Phair J, Carnevale M, Choinski K, Skripochnik E, Koleilat I. Vascular surgeons as expert witnesses in malpractice litigation. J Surg Res 2022; 270: 532-538
• 33 Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (01) 185-190
• 34 Tharp K, Santavicca S, Hughes DR, Kishore D, Banja JD, Duszak Jr R. Characteristics of radiologists serving as medical malpractice expert witnesses for defense versus plaintiff. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19 (07) 807-813
• 35 Jabali AK, Waris A, Khan DI, Ahmed S, Hourani RJ. Electronic health records: three decades of bibliometric research productivity analysis and some insights. Informat Med Unlocked 2022; 29: 100872
• 36 Anesthesiology Guidelines for Expert Witness Qualifications and Testimony. Accessed December 30, 2022 at: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/guidelines-for-expert-witness-qualifications-and-testimony
• 37 American College of Radiology Practice Parameter on the Physician Expert Witness in Radiology and Radiation Oncology. Accessed December 30, 2022 at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/ExpertWitness.pdf
• 38 Orthopaedic Expert Opinion and Testimony. Accessed December 30, 2022 at: https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/about/standards-of-professionalism/microsoft-word---sop-expertopiniontestimony-final-may-2010-revised-w-effective-date.doc.pdf
• 39 Maggiore WA, Kupas DF, Glushak C. National Association of EMS Physicians. Expert witness qualifications and ethical guidelines for emergency medical services litigation: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care 2011; 15 (03) 426-431
• 40 Lehmann CU, Gundlapalli AV, Williamson JJ. et al. Five years of clinical informatics board certification for physicians in the United States of America. Yearb Med Inform 2018; 27 (01) 237-242
• 41 American Board of Medical Specialties. Accessed December 29, 2022 at: https://www.abms.org/board-certification/value-of-board-certification/
• 42 European Union of Medical Specialists. Accessed December 29, 2022 at: https://www.uems.eu/about-us/medical-specialties
• 43 American Medical Informatics Association Health Informatics Certification (AHIC). Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://amia.org/careers-certifications/amia-health-informatics-certification-ahic
• 44 American Board of Preventive Medicine. Clinical Informatics. Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://www.theabpm.org/become-certified/subspecialties/clinical-informatics/
• 45 Turer RW, Levy BP, Hron JD. et al. An open letter arguing for closure of the practice pathway for clinical informatics medical subspecialty certification. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (01) 301-303
• 46 American Medical Association List of Accredited Clinical Informatics Programs. Accessed November 25, 2022 at: https://freida.ama-assn.org/specialty
• 47 Kannry J, Smith J, Mohan V, Levy B, Finnell J, Lehmann CU. Clinical Informatics Program Directors Group-AMIA. Policy statement on clinical informatics fellowships and the future of informatics-driven medicine. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (05) 710-713
• 48 Austin v American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 253 F3rd 967 (7th Cir 2001). Accessed December 30, 2022 at: https://casetext.com/case/austin-v-am-assn-of-neurological-surgeons
• 49 American College of Medical Informatics Fellows Nominations and Elections. Accessed September 20, 2022 at: https://amia.org/communities/acmi-fellowship/acmi-fellows-nominations-and-elections
• 50 Martin-Sanchez F, Ball MJ, Kimura M. et al. International Academy of Health Sciences Informatics (IAHSI): strategy and focus areas, 1st version. Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29 (01) 15-25
• 51 Fellows of the American College of Medical Informatics. Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://amia.org/communities/acmi-fellowship/fellows-acmi
• 52 Fellows of the American Medical Informatics Association Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://amia.org/communities/famia/famia-faqs#
• 53 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Member Advancement Information. Revised May 17, 2022. Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://www.himss.org/sites/hde/files/2022-06/advancement-qualifications.pdf
• 54 About AMIA—Discovering Health Insights. Accelerating Healthcare Transformation. Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://amia.org/about-amia
• 55 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. Who We Are. Accessed July 19, 2022 at: https://www.himss.org/who-we-are