Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2019-3652
Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal wall defects, fistula closure, and stent fixation using through-the-scope tack and suture system
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/202308/lookinside/thumbnails/22526_10-1055-a-2019-3652-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Multiple devices are available for tissue approximation. A new through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) device has recently been introduced; however, data on its scope of use and clinical effectiveness are limited. We aimed to assess the clinical course and effectiveness of this TTSS device.
Methods A retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients who underwent TTSS application. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and secondary outcomes included adverse events and long-term clinical success.
Results 53 patients (mean age 67.8 years; 69.8 % females) were included, with a mean defect size of 32.6 mm (SD 11.9). Technical success was achieved in 51 patients (96.2 %). Clinical success was achieved in 49 patients (92.4 %). Two patients (3.8 %) experienced failed fistula closure after technical success. Long-term follow-up (> 30 days) was available for 45 patients (84.9 %), with a mean follow-up of 7.2 months. One patient (1.9 %) had self-reported bleeding that did not require further intervention.
Conclusions TTTS was an effective and safe method for the closure of large gastrointestinal defects and could be used for fistula closure and stent fixation, making it a valuable addition to the armamentarium of endoscopic closure devices.
Publication History
Received: 25 October 2022
Accepted after revision: 24 January 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 January 2023
Article published online:
13 March 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Ahmed Y, Othman M. EMR/ESD: techniques, complications, and evidence. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22: 39
- 2 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H. et al. Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 376-380
- 3 Mahmoud T, Wong Kee Song LM, Stavropoulos SN. et al. Initial multicenter experience using a novel endoscopic tack and suture system for challenging GI defect closure and stent fixation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 373-382
- 4 Yokota T, Sugihara K, Yoshida S. Endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal neoplastic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1108-1111
- 5 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M. et al. Successful outcomes of a novel endoscopic treatment for GI tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissection with a mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, glycerin, and sugar. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 243-249
- 6 Toyonaga T, Man-I M, Morita Y. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus simplified/hybrid ESD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24: 191-199
- 7 Toyonaga T, Man-I M, Morita Y. et al. The new resources of treatment for early stage colorectal tumors: EMR with small incision and simplified endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2009; 21 (Suppl. 01) S31-37
- 8 Byeon JS, Yang DH, Kim KJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with or without snaring for colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1075-1083
- 9 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
- 10 Albéniz E, Álvarez MA, Espinós JC. et al. Clip closure after resection of large colorectal lesions with substantial risk of bleeding. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 1213-1221
- 11 Zhang LY, Bejjani M, Ghandour B. et al. Endoscopic through-the-scope suturing. VideoGIE 2021; 7: 46-51
- 12 Hernandez A, Marya NB, Sawas T. et al. Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video). Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E572-E577 Erratum in: Endosc Int Open 2022; 9: C12