Role of Helicopter Transfer and Cloud-Type Imaging for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Abstract

Background This study explored if long-distance transfer was safe for patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) and also analyzed the effectiveness of helicopter transfer and cloud-type imaging transfer systems for such patients in northern Hokkaido, Japan.

Methods and Results The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgical treatment for AADA from April 2014 to September 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to the location of referral source hospitals: the Asahikawa city group (group A, n = 49) and the out-of-the-city group (group O, n = 63). Use of helicopter transfer (n = 13) and cloud-type telemedicine (n = 20) in group O were reviewed as subanalyses.

Transfer distance differed between groups (4.2 ± 3.5 km in group A vs 107.3 ± 69.2 km in group O; p = 0.0001), but 30-day mortality (10.2% in group A vs 7.9% in group O; p = 0.676) and hospital mortality (12.2% in group A vs 9.5% in group O; p = 0.687) did not differ. Operative outcomes did not differ with or without helicopter and cloud-type telemedicine, but diagnosis-to-operation time was shorter with helicopter (240.0 ± 70.8 vs 320.0 ± 78.5 minutes; p = 0.031) and telemedicine (242.0 ± 75.2 vs 319.0 ± 83.8 minutes; p = 0.007).

Conclusion We found that long-distance transfer did not impair surgical outcomes in AADA patients, and both helicopter transfer and cloud-type telemedicine system could contribute to the reduction of diagnosis-to-operation time in the large Hokkaido area. Further studies are mandatory to investigate if both the systems will improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords

acute aortic dissection type A - long-distance transfer - helicopter - telemedicine

Ethical Approval Statement

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) (No. 19207), which waived the need for written patient consent because of the retrospective nature of this study. Furthermore, the refusal right was warranted for all patients, as documented on our homepage.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 26. Juli 2022

Angenommen: 30. Januar 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
09. Februar 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. März 2023

• References

• 1 Malaisrie SC, Szeto WY, Halas M. et al; AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee: Adult Cardiac Surgery. 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert consensus document: surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162 (03) 735-758.e2
• 2 Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD. et al. Early mortality in type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. JAMA Cardiol 2022; 7 (10) 1009-1015
• 3 Yamasaki M, Yoshino H, Kunihara T. et al. Risk analysis for early mortality in emergency acute type A aortic dissection surgery: experience of Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60 (04) 957-964
• 4 Motomura N, Miyata H, Tsukihara H, Takamoto S. Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database Organization. Risk model of thoracic aortic surgery in 4707 cases from a nationwide single-race population through a web-based data entry system: the first report of 30-day and 30-day operative outcome risk models for thoracic aortic surgery. Circulation 2008; 118 (14) , Suppl): S153-S159
• 5 Tseng YH, Kao CC, Lin CC. et al. Does interhospital transfer influence the outcomes of patients receiving surgery for acute type A aortic dissection? Type A aortic dissection: is transfer hazardous or beneficial?. Emerg Med Int 2019; 2019: 5692083
• 6 Goldstone AB, Chiu P, Baiocchi M. et al. Interfacility transfer of Medicare beneficiaries with acute type A aortic dissection and regionalization of care in the United States. Circulation 2019; 140 (15) 1239-1250
• 7 Izumisawa Y, Endo H, Ichihara N. et al. Association between prehospital transfer distance and surgical mortality in emergency thoracic aortic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163 (01) 28-35.e1
• 8 Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM. et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 2000; 283 (07) 897-903
• 9 Hirst Jr AE, Johns Jr VJ, Kime Jr SW. Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta: a review of 505 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1958; 37 (03) 217-279
• 10 Aggarwal B, Raymond CE, Randhawa MS. et al. Transfer metrics in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014; 7 (05) 780-782
• 11 Kuang J, Yang J, Wang Q, Yu C, Li Y, Fan R. A preoperative mortality risk assessment model for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2020; 20 (01) 508
• 12 Manzur M, Han SM, Dunn J. et al. Management of patients with acute aortic syndrome through a regional rapid transport system. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65 (01) 21-29
• 13 Gasser S, Stastny L, Kofler M. et al. Rapid response in type A aortic dissection: is there a decisive time interval for surgical repair?. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69 (01) 49-56
• 14 Nakai C, Izumi S, Haraguchi T. et al. Impact of time from symptom onset to operation on outcome of repair of acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165 (03) 984-991.e1
• 15 Matthews CR, Madison M, Timsina LR, Namburi N, Faiza Z, Lee LS. Impact of time between diagnosis to treatment in acute type A aortic dissection. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 3519
• 16 Knobloch K, Dehn I, Khaladj N, Hagl C, Vogt PM, Haverich A. HEMS vs. EMS transfer for acute aortic dissection type A. Air Med J 2009; 28 (03) 146-153
• 17 Rose M, Newton C, Boualam B. et al. Ground same intratransport efficacy as air for acute aortic diseases. Air Med J 2019; 38 (03) 188-194
• 18 Murphy DL, Danielson KR, Knutson K, Utarnachitt RB. Management of acute aortic dissection during critical care air medical transport. Air Med J 2020; 39 (04) 291-295
• 19 Mitchell AD, Tallon JM. Air medical transport of suspected aortic emergencies. Air Med J 2002; 21 (03) 34-37
• 20 Ajibade A, Younas H, Pullan M, Harky A. Telemedicine in cardiovascular surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and our experience. J Card Surg 2020; 35 (10) 2773-2784
• 21 Kronenfeld JP, Kang N, Kenel-Pierre S. et al. Establishing and maintaining a remote vascular surgery aortic program: a single-center 5-year experience at the Veterans Affairs. J Vasc Surg 2021; 75 (03) 1063-1072