Characterization of Patients with Frequent Utilization of the Obstetric Triage Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to identify characteristics of patients with frequent obstetric triage visits (“superusers”) compared to those with fewer visits and to evaluate the association of frequent obstetric triage visits with preterm birth and cesarean delivery.

Study Design This retrospective cohort included patients presenting to the obstetric triage unit at a tertiary care center from March through April 2014. Superusers were defined as individuals having four or more triage visits. Participant characteristics, including demographic, clinical, visit acuity, and health care characteristics of superusers and nonsuperusers, were summarized and compared. In the subset of patients where data were available regarding prenatal care, prenatal visit patterns were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The outcomes of preterm birth and cesarean were compared between groups using modified Poisson regression to control for confounding.

Results Of the 656 patients evaluated in the obstetric triage unit during the study period, 648 patients met the inclusion criteria. Factors associated with frequent triage use included race/ethnicity, multiparity, insurance status, high-risk pregnancy, and a prior preterm birth. Superusers were more likely to present at an earlier gestational age and had a higher proportion of visits for hypertensive disease. Patient acuity scores were not different between the groups. In the subset of patients receiving prenatal care at the institution, prenatal visit patterns were similar. The risk of preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–1.70) did not differ between groups; however, the risk of a cesarean delivery was increased in superusers (aRR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01–1.92) when compared to nonsuperusers.

Conclusion Superusers, compared to nonsuperusers, have distinct clinical and demographic characteristics and are more likely to be seen in the triage unit at earlier gestational ages. Superusers tended to have a higher proportion of visits for hypertensive disease and had an increased risk of cesarean delivery.

Key Points

• Patients with frequent triage visits did not have an increased risk of preterm birth.

• Patients with frequent triage visits were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery.

• Acuity scales were similar for patients with frequent visits compared to those with few visits.

Keywords

pregnancy - emergency department - obstetric triage - prenatal care

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Juli 2022

Angenommen: 06. März 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
09. März 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. April 2023

• References

• 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 667: hospital-based triage of obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (01) e16-e19
• 2 Paisley KS, Wallace R, DuRant PG. The development of an obstetric triage acuity tool. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2011; 36 (05) 290-296 [published erratum appears in MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2012;37:72]
• 3 Ruhl C, Scheich B, Onokpise B, Bingham D. Content validity testing of the maternal fetal triage index. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2015; 44 (06) 701-709
• 4 Smithson DS, Twohey R, Rice T, Watts N, Fernandes CM, Gratton RJ. Implementing an obstetric triage acuity scale: interrater reliability and patient flow analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (04) 287-293
• 5 Gratton RJ, Bazaracai N, Cameron I. et al. Acuity assessment in obstetrical triage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016; 38 (02) 125-133
• 6 Smithson DS, Twohey R, Watts N, Gratton RJ. The impact of standardized acuity assessment and a fast-track on length of stay in obstetric triage: a quality improvement study. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2016; 34 (04) 310-318
• 7 Magriples U, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, Massey Z, Ickovics JR. Prenatal health care beyond the obstetrics service: utilization and predictors of unscheduled care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198 (01) 75.e1-75.e7
• 8 Grajkowski AM, Dolinsky BM, Abbott JL, Batig AL. The pregnancy “super-utilizer”: how does a high-risk depression screen affect medical utilization?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (10) 1167-1171
• 9 Mehta PK, Carter T, Vinoya C, Kangovi S, Srinivas SK. Understanding high utilization of unscheduled care in pregnant women of low socioeconomic status. Womens Health Issues 2017; 27 (04) 441-448
• 10 Malik S, Kothari C, MacCallum C, Liepman M, Tareen S, Rhodes KV. Emergency department use in the perinatal period: an opportunity for early intervention. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70 (06) 835-839
• 11 Kilfoyle KA, Vrees R, Raker CA, Matteson KA. Nonurgent and urgent emergency department use during pregnancy: an observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (02) 181.e1-181.e7
• 12 White Jr HL. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980; 48: 817-838