PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14(03): 478-486
DOI: 10.1055/a-2073-3736
Research Article

Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Implement Emergency Department Delirium Screening

Anita N. Chary
1   Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
2   Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
3   Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Elise Brickhouse
4   School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Beatrice Torres
5   University of Texas School of Public Health, UT Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Ilianna Santangelo
6   Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Christopher R. Carpenter
7   Department of Emergency Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, Emergency Care Research Core, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Shan W. Liu
6   Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
8   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Kyler M. Godwin
2   Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
3   Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Aanand D. Naik
3   Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States
5   University of Texas School of Public Health, UT Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
9   University of Texas Health Consortium on Aging, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Hardeep Singh
2   Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
3   Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Maura Kennedy
6   Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
8   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Institutsangaben Funding This research was supported by the National Institute for Aging (1R03AG078943-01) and the Curtis Hankamer Basic Research Fund and Chao-Physician Scientist Award at Baylor College of Medicine (A. N. C.). A. N. C., K. M. G., A. D. N., and H. S. receive support from the Houston Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (grant number: CIN13-413).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to understand how emergency departments (EDs) use health information technology (HIT), and specifically the electronic health record (EHR), to support implementation of delirium screening.

Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 ED clinician-administrators, representing 20 EDs, about how they used HIT resources to implement delirium screening. Interviews focused on challenges participants experienced when implementing ED delirium screening and EHR-based strategies they used to overcome them. We coded interview transcripts using dimensions from the Singh and Sittig sociotechnical model, which addresses use of HIT in complex adaptive health care systems. Subsequently, we analyzed data for common themes across dimensions of the sociotechnical model.

Results Three themes emerged about how the EHR could be used to address challenges in implementation of delirium screening: (1) staff adherence to screening, (2) communication among ED team members about a positive screen, and (3) linking positive screening to delirium management. Participants described several HIT-based strategies including visual nudges, icons, hard stop alerts, order sets, and automated communications that facilitated implementation of delirium screening. An additional theme emerged about challenges related to the availability of HIT resources.

Conclusion Our findings provide practical HIT-based strategies for health care institutions planning to adopt geriatric screenings. Building delirium screening tools and reminders to perform screening into the EHR may prompt adherence to screening. Automating related workflows, team communication, and management of patients who screen positive for delirium may help save staff members' time. Staff education, engagement, and access to HIT resources may support successful screening implementation.

Keywords

delirium - screening - geriatrics - electronic health record

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This research was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board, Houston, TX (H-50838) and deemed exempt by the Partners Healthcare Institutional Review Board, Boston, Massachusetts, United States (identifier: 2021P001558).


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. Februar 2023

Angenommen: 06. April 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
13. April 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Juni 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Inouye SK. Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (11) 1157-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Han JH, Wilber ST. Altered mental status in older emergency department patients. Clin Geriatr Med 2013; 29 (01) 101-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Carpenter CR, Hammouda N, Linton EA. et al; GEAR Network. Delirium prevention, detection, and treatment in emergency medicine settings: a Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement. Acad Emerg Med 2021; 28 (01) 19-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Han JH, Zimmerman EE, Cutler N. et al. Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16 (03) 193-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Suffoletto B, Miller T, Frisch A, Callaway C. Emergency physician recognition of delirium. Postgrad Med J 2013; 89 (1057): 621-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hustey FM, Meldon SW. The prevalence and documentation of impaired mental status in elderly emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39 (03) 248-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Élie M, Rousseau F, Cole M, Primeau F, McCusker J, Bellavance F. Prevalence and detection of delirium in elderly emergency department patients. CMAJ 2000; 163 (08) 977-981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kakuma R, du Fort GG, Arsenault L. et al. Delirium in older emergency department patients discharged home: effect on survival. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51 (04) 443-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ashman JJ, Schappert SM, Santo L. Emergency department visits among adults aged 60 and over: United States, 2014-2017. NCHS Data Brief 2020; 367 (367) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 American College of Emergency Physicians, American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Nurses Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines Task Force. Geriatric emergency department guidelines. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 63 (05) e7-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Elder NM, Bambach KS, Gregory ME, Gulker P, Southerland LT. Are geriatric screening tools too time consuming for the emergency department? A workflow time study. J Geriatr Emerg Med 2021; 2 (06) 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Southerland LT, Hunold KM, Van Fossen J. et al. An implementation science approach to geriatric screening in an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70 (01) 178-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mailhot T, Saczynski JS, Malyuta Y, Inouye SK, Darling C. An emergency department delirium screening and management initiative: the development and refinement of the SCREENED-ED intervention. J Gerontol Nurs 2021; 47 (12) 13-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Southerland LT, Stephens JA, Carpenter CR. et al. Study protocol for IMAGE: implementing multidisciplinary assessments for geriatric patients in an emergency department observation unit, a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci Commun 2020; 1: 28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kennedy M, Lesser A, Israni J. et al. Reach and adoption of a geriatric emergency department accreditation program in the United States. Ann Emerg Med 2022; 79 (04) 367-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chary AN, Lesser A, Inouye SK, Carpenter CR, Stuck AR, Kennedy M. A survey of delirium self-reported knowledge and practices among emergency physicians in the United States. J Geriatr Emerg Med 2021; 2 (12) 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kennedy M, Webb M, Gartaganis S. et al. ED-DEL: development of a change package and toolkit for delirium in the emergency department. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2021; 2 (02) e12421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Han J. Delirium Triage Screen (DTS) Instruction Manual Version 1.0. Published September 1, 2015. Accessed March 16, 2023 at: http://eddelirium.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DTS-Training-Manual-Version-1.0-09-01-2015.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Han J. Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM) Instruction Manual. Published October 15, 2015. Accessed March 16, 2023 at: https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5b0849daec50243a0a1e5e0c/5bb3783be59e3422910fc5ba_bCAM-Training-Manual-Version-1-0-10-15-2015.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 El Hussein MT, Hirst S, Stares R. Delirium in emergency departments: is it recognized?. J Emerg Nurs 2021; 47 (05) 809-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chary A, Weaver E, Lesser A. et al. Emergency nurses recognize a need for education of delirium prevention and management in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2022; 48 (02) 126-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chary AN, Torres B, Brickhouse E. et al. Language discordance in emergency department delirium screening: results from a qualitative interview-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71 (04) 1328-1331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Singh H, Sittig DF. Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: the Health IT Safety Framework. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (04) 226-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19 (06) 349-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bernard HR. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 5th ed. AltaMira Press; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (Suppl. 03) i68-i74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 American College of Emergency Physicians. Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Program (GEDA). Accessed August 2, 2022 at: https://www.acep.org/geda/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Curtis K, Qian S, Yu P. et al. Does electronic medical record redesign increase screening of risk for pressure injury, falls and substance use in the emergency department? An implementation evaluation. Australas Emerg Care 2021; 24 (01) 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mulhem E, Brown I, Song K. Electronic health record reminder effect on hepatitis C antibody screening. J Am Board Fam Med 2020; 33 (06) 1016-1019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hughes MS, Apostolou A, Reilley B, Leston J, McCollum J, Iralu J. Electronic health record reminders for chlamydia screening in an American Indian population. Public Health Rep 2021; 136 (03) 320-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Burdick TE, Kessler RS. Development and use of a clinical decision support tool for behavioral health screening in primary care clinics. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (02) 412-429
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (02) 104-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Strom BL, Schinnar R, Aberra F. et al. Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 (17) 1578-1583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chary AN, Castilla-Ojo N, Joshi C. et al. Evaluating older adults with cognitive dysfunction: a qualitative study with emergency clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70 (02) 341-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shenvi C, Kennedy M, Austin CA, Wilson MP, Gerardi M, Schneider S. Managing delirium and agitation in the older emergency department patient: the ADEPT tool. Ann Emerg Med 2020; 75 (02) 136-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gatewood MO, Wemple M, Greco S, Kritek PA, Durvasula R. A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24 (12) 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Stanhope V, Matthews EB. Delivering person-centered care with an electronic health record. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19 (01) 168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Windle JR, Windle TA, Shamavu KY. et al. Roadmap to a more useful and usable electronic health record. Cardiovasc Digit Health J 2021; 2 (06) 301-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pruitt ZM, Howe JL, Hettinger AZ, Ratwani RM. Emergency physician perceptions of electronic health record usability and safety. J Patient Saf 2021; 17 (08) e983-e987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar