Download PDF
Radiopraxis 2023; 16(02): E34-E53
DOI: 10.1055/a-2075-4429
CPD-Fortbildung

Typische Probleme und Fehler im radiologischen Nachtdienst

Svea Storjohann
,
Anika Pusch
,
Rebecca Kessler
,
Michael Kirsch
› Further Information
Also available at
CPD
    Permissions and Reprints

Außerhalb der Regelarbeitszeit wird der Präsenzdienst in den meisten Krankenhäusern von Weiterbildungsassistenten geleistet. Sie sind gut beraten, einerseits die wichtigsten Krankheitsbilder zu kennen, die in dieser Übersichtsarbeit dargestellt werden, und andererseits die Fälle, die sie nicht lösen können, an ihren Hintergrund weiterzuleiten.



Publication History

Article published online:
02 June 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bruni SG, Bartlett E, Yu E. Factors involved in discrepant preliminary radiology resident interpretations of neuroradiological imaging studies: a retrospective analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 1367-1374
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Davenport MS, Ellis JH, Khalatbari SH. et al. Effect of work hours, caseload, shift type, and experience on resident call performance. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 921-927
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mellnick V, Raptis C, McWilliams S. et al. On-call radiology resident discrepancies: categorization by patient location and severity. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13: 1233-1238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Weinberg BD, Richter MD, Champine JG. et al. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12: 95-100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Karul M, Berliner C, Keller S. et al. Imaging of appendicitis in adults. Rofo 2014; 186: 551-558
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Levine CD, Aizenstein O, Lehavi O. et al. Why we miss the diagnosis of appendicitis on abdominal CT: evaluation of imaging features of appendicitis incorrectly diagnosed on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 855-859
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Thompson WM, Kilani RK, Smith BB. et al. Accuracy of abdominal radiography in acute small-bowel obstruction: does reviewer experience matter?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: W233-W238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW. et al. CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 37-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Paulson EK, Thompson WM. Review of small-bowel obstruction: the diagnosis and when to worry. Radiology 2015; 275: 332-342
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mayo-Smith WW, Wittenberg J, Bennett GL. et al. The CT small bowel faeces sign: description and clinical significance. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 765-767
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimaraes LS. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographics 2009; 29: 423-439
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ferzoco L, Raptopoulos V, Silen W. Acute diverticulitis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1521-1526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Gaglia A, Probert CS. Diverticular disease. Medicine 2015; 43: 320-323
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hong MK, Skandarajah AR, Hayes IP. Diverticulosis, diverticular disease and diverticulitis-definitions and differences. Journal of Stomal Therapy Australia 2015; 35: 8-10
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Shahedi K, Fuller G, Bolus R. et al. Long-term risk of acute diverticulitis among patients with incidental diverticulosis found during colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1609-1613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 You H, Sweeny A, Cooper ML. et al. The management of diverticulitis: a review of the guidelines. Med J Aust 2019; 211: 421-427
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Leifeld L, Germer C, Böhm S. et al. S2k-Leitlinie Divertikelkrankheit/Divertikulitis. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 663-710
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Van Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG. et al. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Weinrich JM, Bannas P, Regier M. et al. Low-Dose CT for Evaluation of Suspected Urolithiasis: Diagnostic Yield for Assessment of Alternative Diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: 557-563
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Wu DSH, Stoller ML. Indinavir urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol 2000; 10: 557-561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Meinel FG, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ. et al. Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2015; 128: 747-759.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Meyer M, Haubenreisser H, Sudarski S. et al. Where do we stand? Functional imaging in acute and chronic pulmonary embolism with state-of-the-art CT. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2432-2437
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Ruggiero A, Screaton N. Imaging of acute and chronic thromboembolic disease: state of the art. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 375-388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2019; ehz405
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Torsello G, Czerny M, Grundmann R. et al. S2k-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Typ-B-Aortendissektion. Gefässchirurgie 2018; 23: 513-518
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Ardellier FD, DʼOstrevy N, Cassagnes L. et al. CT patterns of acute type A aortic arch dissection: longer, higher, more anterior. Br J Radiol 2017; 90: 20170417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Stephan K, Huber S, Häberle S. et al. Spinal cord injury-incidence, prognosis, and outcome: an analysis of the Trauma-Register DGU. Spine J 2015; 15: 1994-2001
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein S. et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 1994; 3: 184-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Denis F. Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 189: 65-76
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Menon BK, Goyal M. Imaging paradigms in acute ischemic stroke: a pragmatic evidence-based approach. Radiology 2015; 277: 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Riedel CH, Zoubie J, Ulmer S. et al. Thin-slice reconstructions of nonenhanced CT images allow for detection of thrombus in acute stroke. Stroke 2012; 43: 2319-2323
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Mainali S, Wahba M, Elijovich L. Detection of early ischemic changes in noncontrast CT head improved with “Stroke Windows”. ISRN Neurosci 2014; 2014: 654980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hanning U, Sporns PB, Schmiedel M. et al. CT versus MR techniques in the detection of cervical artery dissection. J Neuroimaging 2017; 27: 607-612
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 898-906
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Dmytriw AA, Song JSA, Yu E. et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: state of the art diagnosis and management. Neuroradiology 2018; 60: 669-685
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Bonneville F. Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95: 1145-1150
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Leach JL, Fortuna RB, Jones BV. et al. Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 2006; 26: S19-S41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Buyck P, De Keyzer F, Vanneste D. et al. CT density measurement and H:H ratio are useful in diagnosing acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34: 1568-1572
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar