Das soziale Gehirn – Neurobiologie des Sozialverhaltens

Die Spezies Homo sapiens zeichnet sich durch ein außerordentlich hohes Maß an sozialer Interaktivität in allen Lebensphasen und Alltagsaufgaben aus. Für Aktivitäten in der sozialen Gemeinschaft und für die Teilhabe am sozialen und beruflichen Leben ist die Fähigkeit zu einem geordneten Sozialverhalten eine notwendige Grundlage.

Publication History

Article published online:
08 June 2023

• Literaturverzeichnis

• 1 Bargh JA, Chartrand TL.. The unbearable automaticity ofbeing. American Psychologist. 1999: 462-479 DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
• 2 Smaers JB, Gómez-Robles A, Parks AN, Sherwood CC. Exceptional evolutionary expansion of prefrontal cortex ingreat apes and humans. Current Biology 2017; 27 (05) 714-720 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.020.
• 3 Carlén M. What constitutes the prefrontal cortex? Science. 2017 358 (6362) 478-482 DOI: 10.1126/science. aan8868
• 4 Brodmann K.. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grobhirnrinde in ihren Prinzipiendargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues/ [K. Bordmann]. Leipzig: Barth; 1909
• 5 Dunbar RIM. The social brain hypothesis and its implicationsfor social evolution. Annals of Human Biology 2009; 36 (05) 562-572 DOI: 10.1080/03014460902960289.
• 6 Dunbar RIM. Structure and function in human and primatesocial networks: Implicationsfor diffusion, network stabilityand health. Proceeding. Mathematical, physical and engineering science. 2020 476 (2249) 20200446 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0446
• 7 Frith CD, Frith U. How we predict what other people aregoing to do. Brain research. 2006 1079 (1) 36-46 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126
• 8 Axelrod V. On the domain-specificity of the visual andnon-visual face-selective regions. European Journal of Neuroscience 2016; 44: 2049-2063 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13290.
• 9 De Gelder B, de Borst AW, Watson R.. The perception ofemotion in body expressions. Wiley interdisciplinaryreviews. Cognitive Science 2015; 06: 149-158 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1335. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
• 10 Liebenthal E, Silbersweig DA, Stern E. The language, toneand prosody of emotions: Neural substrates and dynamics ofspoken-word emotion perception. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2016; 10: 506 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00506.
• 11 Boesveldt S, Parma V. The importance of the olfactorysystem in human well-being, through nutrition and socialbehavior. Cell and tissue research. 2021 383 (1) 559-567 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-020-03367-7
• 12 Vogeley K, Fink GR. Neural correlates of the first-person- perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences 2003; 07 (01) 38-42 DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00003-7.
• 13 Van Buuren M, Sijtsma H, Lute N. et al Development of theneural correlates of self- and other-referential processingacross adolescence. Neuro Image. 2022 252 119032 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119032
• 14 Markett S, Montag C, Reuter M. Network neuroscience andpersonality. Personal neuroscience 2018; 10: e14 DOI: 10.1017/pen.2018.12.
• 15 Northoff G, Heinzel A, de Greck M. et al Self-referentialprocessing in our brain: A meta--analysis of imaging studieson the self. Neuro Image 2006; 31 (01) 440-457 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002.
• 16 Vogeley K. Two social brains: Neural mechanisms ofintersubjectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the royal societyof London. Series B, biological science. 2017 372 (1727) 20160245 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0245
• 17 Schmidt SNL, Hass J, Kirsch P. et al The human mirrorneuron system: A commonneural basis for social cognition?. Psychophysiology 2021; 58 (05) e13781 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13781.
• 18 Eslinger PJ, Anders S, Ballarini T. et al The neuroscience ofsocial feelings: Mechanisms of adaptive social functioning. Neuroscience andbiobehavioralreviews 2021; 128: 592-620 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.028.
• 19 Feldman R. The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in cognitivescience 2017; 21 (02) 80-99 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007.
• 20 Long M, Verbeke W, Ein-Dor T. et al A functionalneuro-anatomical model of human attachment (NAMA):Insights from first- and second-person social neuroscience. Cortex 2020; 126: 281-321 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.010.
• 21 Miyazono K, Inarimori K. Empathy, altruism, and groupidentification. Frontiers inpsychology 2021; 12: 749315 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749315.
• 22 Romano A, Saral AS, Wu J. Direct and indirect reciprocityamong individuals and groups. Currentopinion inpsychology 2022; 43: 254-259 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.003.
• 23 Filkowski M M, Cochran R N, Haas B W. Altruistic behavior:Mapping responses in the brain. Neuroscience andneuroeconomics 2016; 05: 65-75 DOI: 10.2147/NAN.S87718.
• 24 Bellucci G, Camilleri JA, Eickhoff SB. et al Neuralsignatures of prosocial behaviors. Neuroscience andbiobehavioralreviews 2020; 118: 186-19521 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.006.
• 25 Fries W. „The Social Brain“–Neurobiologie des Sozialverhaltens. Stuttgart. Georg Thieme Verlag. 2023: 16-22 DOI: 10.1055/a-2000-9056
• 26 Killen M, Smetana JG. Origins and development of morality. In: Lamb ME, Lerner RM, eds. Handbook of Child Psychologyand Developmental Science: Socioemotional Processes. 2015: 701-749 DOI: 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy317
• 27 llemers N, van der Toorn J, Paunov Y. et al Thepsychology of morality: A review and analysis of empiricalstudies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality andsocial psychology review 2019; 23: 332-366 DOI: 10.1177/1088868318811759.
• 28 Stanley ML, De Brigard F. Moral memories and the belief inthe good self. Current directions in psychological science 2019; 28: 387-391 DOI: 10.1177/096372141984799.
• 29 Pascual L, Rodrigues P, Gallardo-Pujol D. How does moralitywork in the brain? A functional and structural perspective ofmoral behavior. Frontiers inintegrativeneuroscience 2013; 07: 65 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00065.
• 30 Eres R, Louis WR, Molenberghs P. Common and distinctneural networks involved in fMRI studies investigatingmorality: An ALE meta-analysis. Social neuroscience 2018; 13: 384-398 DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1357657.
• 31 Luo J. The neural basis of and a common neural circuitry indifferent types of pro-social behavior. Frontier inpsychology 2018; 09: 859 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00859.
• 32 Montague PR, Berns GS, Cohen JD. et al Hyperscanning:simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 1159-1164 DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1150.
• 33 Misaki M, Kerr KL, Ratliff EL. et al Beyond synchrony: Thecapacity of fMRIhyperscanning for the study of humansocial interaction. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 2021; 16: 84-92 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa143.
• 34 Henry JD, von Hippel W, Molenberghs P. et al Clinicalassessment of social cognitive function in neurologicaldisorders. Naturereviews. Neurology 2016; 12: 28-39 DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.229.
• 35 Ubukata S, Tanemura R, Yoshizumi M. et al Social cognitionand its relationship to functional outcomes in patients withsustained acquired brain injury. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment 2014; 10: 2061-2068 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S68156.
• 36 Milders M. Relationship between social cognition and socialbehaviour following traumatic brain injury. Brain injury 2019; 33: 62-68 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2018.
• 37 Nijsse B, Spikman JM, Visser-Meily JMA. et al Social cognitionimpairments are associated with behavioural changes in thelong term after stroke. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0213725 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213725.
• 38 Tibæk M, Kammersgaard LP, Johnsen SP. et al Long-termreturn to work after acquired brain injury in young Danish adults: A nation-wide registry-based cohort study. Frontier in neurology 2019; 09: 1180 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01180.
• 39 Carter CS. The Oxytocin-Vasopressin pathway in the contextof love and fear. Frontiers in endocrinology 2017; 08: 356 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00356.
• 40 Cohen-Zimerman S, Khilwani H, Smith GN L. et al The neuralbasis for mental state attribution: A voxel-based lesionmapping study. Human brain mapping 2021; 42: 65-79 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25203.