RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2125-7645
Letter to the Editor: Misophonia: A Need for Audiological Diagnostic Guidelines
Funding Funding for this commentary was provided by The REAM Foundation and Milken Institute's Center for Strategic Philanthropy in order to promote awareness of the new consensus definition for misophonia.The Misophonia Consensus Definition
Misophonia is a perceptual disorder that is gaining increased awareness across the fields of neuroscience, psychiatry, behavioral psychology, and audiology. However, conclusions as to the underlying etiology and effective management of misophonia suffer from inconsistent definitions of this disorder in the literature. For instance, some authors define misophonia as “hatred of sound” resulting in anger,[1] while others consider it to be a reaction to patterns of sound in certain settings.[2] To clarify the definition of this disorder for research and clinical purposes, the Misophonia Research Fund, an organization supported by The REAM Foundation and in partnership with the Milken Institute's Center for Strategic Philanthropy, invited a panel of 15 professionals with specialties in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, neuropsychology, behavioral psychology, psychiatry, and audiology to develop a consensus definition of misophonia.[3] Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi method, which consisted of four rounds of voting on misophonia-related statements drawn from 68 references in the literature. Eighty percent agreement among the consensus team was required for the inclusion of identifiers and descriptors in the definition. The general description of the consensus definition is included below:
-
Misophonia is a disorder of decreased tolerance to specific sounds or stimuli associated with such sounds. These stimuli, known as “triggers,” are experienced as unpleasant or distressing and tend to evoke strong negative emotional, physiological, and behavioral responses that are not seen in most other people. Misophonic responses do not seem to be elicited by the loudness of auditory stimuli, but rather by the specific pattern or meaning to an individual. Trigger stimuli are often repetitive and primarily, but not exclusively, include stimuli generated by another individual, especially those produced by the human body. Once a trigger stimulus is detected, individuals with misophonia may have difficulty distracting themselves from the stimulus and may experience suffering, distress, and/or impairment in social, occupational, or academic functioning. The expression of misophonic symptoms varies, as does the severity, which ranges from mild to severe impairments. Some individuals with misophonia are aware that their reactions to misophonic trigger stimuli are disproportionate to the circumstances. Misophonia symptoms are typically first observed in childhood or early adolescence.[3]
Notably, the consensus definition characterizes misophonia as a sound tolerance disorder in which distinct sounds and/or related sensory input (such as visual imagery) elicit strong negative emotional, physiological, and behavioral reactions not typically observed in the general population. This designation differs from the opinion of other experts, who have stated that misophonia should be classified as a psychiatric disorder, with diagnostic criteria as such.[1] [4] [5] According to the consensus definition, sensory input that evokes atypical negative responses to sound is termed a “trigger” and is usually generated by another entity (e.g., a family member), specifically but not limited to the human body (e.g., chewing versus mechanical sounds). Triggers may initiate intense emotional responses of distress and subsequent difficulty functioning in everyday life,[6] with such responses lying along a spectrum of severity. Please refer to Swedo et al,[3] for the complete consensus definition.
This expert definition clarifies several points concerning triggers, associated symptomatology, and resulting behavioral impairments in individuals with misophonia, as well as emphasizes the importance of differential diagnosis from similar pathologies (e.g., obsessive, compulsive-related disorders and hyperacusis). For instance, misophonic responses may be triggered by auditory inputs and other sensory stimuli present concurrent with the auditory event. These emotional responses can include many different manifestations, such as anger, irritation, and disgust.[5] Responses may also be moderated by external factors or context, including the environment in which the trigger is presented, the patient's relationship with the source of the trigger, and the sense of control over the aversive stimulus.[7] [8] Finally, it is important to consider misophonia in relation to comparable disorders, particularly for therapeutic intervention purposes. Patterns of psychiatric disorders across a varied range have been found to be highly comorbid with misophonia.[9] The most reported have been mood disorders, such as anxiety and depression.[5] [6] [9] These conditions may require medication and/or specific behavioral therapy that is outside of the audiologist's scope of practice. Within the audiologist's scope of practice, it is critical that misophonia be differentially diagnosed from the auditory disorders of hearing loss, tinnitus, recruitment, phonophobia, and, most of all, hyperacusis.[2] [10] For example, the general description of the Misophonia Consensus Definition could also characterize hyperacusis, as both are sound tolerance disorders and involve an intense emotional, behavioral, and physiologic response to sound. Intervention options for sound tolerance disorders include cognitive behavioral therapy, sound therapy, and tinnitus retraining therapy.[2] [11] Clearly, diagnosis and management of misophonia requires a multidisciplinary approach in which psychiatrists, psychologists, and audiologists come together. However, little guidance is provided in the literature regarding the audiological diagnostic criteria for misophonia.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 26. Januar 2023
Angenommen: 04. Juli 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
10. Juli 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Oktober 2024
© 2024. American Academy of Audiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
-
References
- 1 Schröder A, Vulink N, Denys D. Misophonia: diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder. PLoS One 2013; 8 (01) e54706
- 2 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. Treatments for decreased sound tolerance (hyperacusis and misophonia). Semin Hear 2014; 3: 105-120
- 3 Swedo SE, Baguley DM, Denys D. et al. Consensus definition of misophonia: a Delphi study. Front Neurosci 2022; 16: 841816
- 4 Dozier TH, Lopez M, Pearson C. Proposed diagnostic criteria for misophonia: a Multisensory conditioned aversive reflex disorder. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 1975
- 5 Jager I, de Koning P, Bost T, Denys D, Vulink N. Misophonia: phenomenology, comorbidity and demographics in a large sample. PLoS One 2020; 15 (04) e0231390
- 6 Guzick AG, Cervin M, Smith EEA. et al. Clinical characteristics, impairment, and psychiatric morbidity in 102 youth with misophonia. J Affect Disord 2023; 324: 395-402
- 7 Edelstein M, Brang D, Rouw R, Ramachandran VS. Misophonia: physiological investigations and case descriptions. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 296
- 8 Siepsiak M, Vrana SR, Rynkiewicz A, Rosenthal MZ, Dragan WŁ. Does context matter in misophonia? A multi-method experimental investigation. Front Neurosci 2023; 16: 880853
- 9 Rosenthal MZ, McMahon K, Greenleaf AS. et al. Phenotyping misophonia: Psychiatric disorders and medical health correlates. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 941898
- 10 Tyler RS, Pienkowski M, Roncancio ER. et al. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part I. Definitions and manifestations. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (04) 402-419
- 11 Henry JA, Theodoroff SM, Edmonds C. et al. Sound tolerance conditions (hyperacusis, misophonia, noise sensitivity, and phonophobia): definitions and management. Am J Audiol 2022; 31 (03) 513-527
- 12 Aazh H, Erfanian M, Danesh AA, Moore BCJ. Audiological and other factors predicting the presence of misophonia symptoms among a clinical population seeking help for tinnitus and/or hyperacusis. Front Neurosci 2022; a 16: 900065
- 13 Baguley DM. Hyperacusis. J R Soc Med 2003; 96 (12) 582-585
- 14 Fackrell K, Potgieter I, Shekhawat GS, Baguley DM, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Clinical interventions of hyperacusis in adults: a scoping review to assess the current position and determine priorities for research. BioMed Res Int 2017; 2017: 2723715
- 15 Palumbo DB, Alsalman O, De Ridder D, Song JJ, Vanneste S. Misophonia and potential underlying mechanisms: a perspective. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 953
- 16 Salvi R, Chen G-D, Manohar S. Hyperacusis: loudness intolerance, fear, annoyance and pain. Hear Res 2022; 426: 108648
- 17 Pellicori J. Clinician's guide to misophonia. AudiologyOnline 2020 ; Article 27026. Accessed July 24, 2023 at: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/clinician-s-guide-to-misophonia-27099
- 18 Sherlock LP, Formby C. Considerations in the development of a sound tolerance interview and questionnaire instrument. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (01) 53-70
- 19 Aazh H, Hayes C, Moore BCJ, Danesh AA, Vitoratou S. Psychometric evaluation of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire (HIQ) and Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire (SSSQ) using a clinical population of adult patients with tinnitus alone or combined with hyperacusis. J Am Acad Audiol 2022; b 33 (05) 248-258
- 20 Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (02) 143-148
- 21 Henry JA, Griest S, Thielman E, McMillan G, Kaelin C, Carlson KF. Tinnitus Functional Index: development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res 2016; 334: 58-64
- 22 Henry JA, Meikle MB. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (03) 138-155
- 23 Jin I-K, Tyler RS. Measuring tinnitus in pharmaceutical clinical trials. J Acoust Soc Am 2022; 152 (06) 3843
- 24 Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH. et al. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151 (02) S1-S40
- 25 Khalfa S, Dubal S, Veuillet E, Perez-Diaz F, Jouvent R, Collet L. Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002; 64 (06) 436-442
- 26 Greenberg B, Carlos M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of a new scale to measure hyperacusis: Introducing the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (05) 1025-1034
- 27 Rosenthal MZ, Anand D, Cassiello-Robbins C. et al. Development and initial validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 709928
- 28 Wu MS, Lewin AB, Murphy TK, Storch EA. Misophonia: incidence, phenomenology, and clinical correlates in an undergraduate student sample. J Clin Psychol 2014; 70 (10) 994-1007
- 29 Campbell J, LaBrec A, Bean C, Nielsen M, So W. Auditory gating and extended high-frequency thresholds in normal-hearing adults with minimal tinnitus. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (1S): 209-224
- 30 Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Factors related to uncomfortable loudness levels for patients seen in a tinnitus and hyperacusis clinic. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (10) 793-800
- 31 Sherlock LP, Formby C. Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (02) 85-100
- 32 Savard M-A, Sares AG, Coffey EBJ, Deroche MLD. Specificity of affective responses in misophonia depends on trigger identification. Front Neurosci 2022; 16: 879583
- 33 Samermit P, Young M, Allen AK. et al. Development and evaluation of a sound-swapped video database for misophonia. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 890829
- 34 Benesch D, Orloff D, Hansen H. FOAMS: processed audio files. Zenodo 2022 . Accessed July 24, 2023 at: https://zenodo.org/record/7109069#.ZCXvx1LMLz8
- 35 Schröder A, van Diepen R, Mazaheri A. et al. Diminished n1 auditory evoked potentials to oddball stimuli in misophonia patients. Front Behav Neurosci 2014; 8: 123
- 36 Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987; 24 (04) 375-425
- 37 Kumar S, Tansley-Hancock O, Sedley W. et al. The brain basis for misophonia. Curr Biol 2017; 27 (04) 527-533
- 38 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315 (08) 801-810
- 39 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. The neurophysiological approach to misophonia: theory and treatment. Front Neurosci 2023; 17: 895574