Synlett 2023; 34(19): 2315-2318 DOI: 10.1055/a-2132-1938
Synthesis of Superarmed Thioglycosides via the Ring Opening of 1,2-Orthoesters
Zoe Beato
a
Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, School of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
b
BiOrbic, Bioeconomy SFI research centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
,
Xiangming Zhu∗
a
Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, School of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
b
BiOrbic, Bioeconomy SFI research centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
› Author Affiliations This research was supported by BiOrbic, Bioeconomy SFI Research Centre, which is funded by Ireland's European Structural and Investment Programmes, Science Foundation Ireland (16/RC/ 3889, 18/EPSRC-CDT/3582) and the European Regional Development Fund.
Abstract
Since the advent of the armed–disarmed strategy, thioglycosides have become essential tools in one-pot oligosaccharide synthesis. The continuum of glycosyl donor reactivity has since been expanded to include so-called ‘superarmed’ thioglycoside donors whose reactivity relies on more than just the inductive effects of protecting groups. Here we report a new method for the synthesis of superarmed thioglycosides via the ring opening of 1,2-orthoesters. This method ensures the necessary 1,2-trans stereochemistry, and importantly, makes use of trimethylsilyl thioethers as sulfur nucleophiles to avoid the use of unpleasant free thiols. Ten examples of ethyl and phenyl thioglycosides of mono- and disaccharides were synthesised from their orthoesters using tris (pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF) as the Lewis acid promoter and were obtained in good yield and purity.
Key words
thioglycoside -
superarmed -
BCF -
orthoester -
stereoselective
Supporting Information
Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2132-1938.
Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 21 June 2023
Accepted after revision: 18 July 2023
Accepted Manuscript online: 18 July 2023
Article published online: 20 September 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
References and Notes
1
Lian G,
Zhang X,
Biao Y.
Carbohydr. Res. 2015; 403: 13
2
Zhu XM,
Schmidt RR.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 1900
3
Mootoo DR,
Konradsson P,
Udodong U,
Fraser-Reid B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 5583
4a
Codée JD. C,
Litjens RE. J. N,
van den Bos LJ,
Overkleeft HS,
van der Marel GA.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005; 34: 769
4b
Cao S,
Gan Z,
Roy R.
Carbohydr. Res. 1999; 318: 75
4c
Jensen HH,
Pedersen CM,
Bols M.
Chem. Eur. J. 2007; 13: 7576
4d
Kamat MN,
Demchenko AV.
Org. Lett. 2007; 7: 3215
5a
Guo J,
Ye X.-S.
Molecules 2010; 15: 7235
5b
Premathilake HD,
Demchenko AV.
Top. Curr. Chem. 2010; 301: 189
6a
Mydock LK,
Demchenko AV.
Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 2107
6b
Premathilake HD,
Mydock LK,
Demchenko AV.
J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 1095
7a
Li J,
Wang M,
Zhang X.
Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 9053
7b
Wang LX,
Sakairi N,
Kuzuhara H.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990; 1677
8a
Tiwari VK,
Kumar A,
Schmidt RR.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 2945
8b
Uriel C,
Ventura J,
Gómez AM,
López C,
Frasier-Reid B.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 3122
8c
Pozsgay V,
Kubler-Kielb J,
Coxon B,
Santacroce P,
Robbins JB,
Schneerson R.
J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 5922
8d
Kaeothip S,
Demchenko AV.
Carbohydr. Res. 2011; 346: 1371
9
Kong F.
Carbohydr. Res. 2007; 342: 345
10a
Garegg PJ,
Konradsson P,
Kvarnstrom I,
Norberg T,
Svensson SC. T,
Wigilius B.
Acta Chem. Scand. B 1985; 39: 569
10b
Uriel C,
Ventura J,
Gómez AM,
López C,
Frasier-Reid B.
J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 795
11
Kafle A,
Liu J,
Ciu L.
Can. J. Chem. 2016; 94: 894
12
Kong F.
Curr. Org. Chem. 2003; 7: 841
13a
General Procedure for the Formation of Ethyl 2-O -Acetyl Thioglycosides
A sugar orthoester (0.20 mmol) was dried under high vacuum for 1 h. The flask was flushed with N2 , and dry CH2 Cl2 (5 mL) was added. The flask was cooled to 0 °C and (ethylthio)trimethylsilane (72 μL, 0.44 mmol, 2.2 equiv) was added followed by tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (0.150 g, 0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min. The reaction was neutralised with triethylamine (0.1 mL) and then concentrated in vacuo . The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (cHex/EtOAc, 8:1) to give the product as a colorless solid. Compound 6a was obtained as a colorless solid (0.074 g, 0.139 mmol, 70%). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 7.38–7.27 (m, 13 H, ArCH), 7.20 (dd, J = 7.3, 2.1 Hz, 2 H, ArCH), 5.06 (dd, J = 10.1, 9.0 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 4.82 (dd, J = 11.1, 7.5 Hz, 2 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.71 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.65–4.55 (m, 3 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.38 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 3.78 (dd, J = 11.1, 2.0 Hz, 1 H, H-6a), 3.75–3.67 (m, 3 H, H-3, H-4, H-6b), 3.52 (ddt, J = 6.7, 4.5, 2.1 Hz, 1 H, H-5), 2.80–2.65 (m, 2 H, SCH2 ), 2.00 (s, 3 H,C(O)CH3 ), 1.28 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, S(CH2 )CH3 ) ppm. 13 C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 169.8 (C=O), 138.3, 138.3, 138.0 (ArC), 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7 (ArCH), 84.5 (C-3), 83.5 (C-1), 79.6 (C-5), 78.0 (C-4), 75.4 (benzyl CH2 ), 75.2 (benzyl CH2 ), 73.6 (benzyl CH2 ), 71.9 (C-2), 69.0 (C-6), 23.9 (SCH2 ), 21.1 (acetyl CH3 ), 15.0 (SCH2
C H3 ) ppm.
Spectra matched literature reports:
13b
Ple K,
Chwalek M,
Voutquenne-Nazabadioko L.
Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 4347
14a
Ethyl-2-O -benzoyl-3,4,6-tri-O -benzyl-1-thio-β-d -glucopyranoside (9a)
Orthoester 4 (0.20 mmol) was dried under high vacuum for 1 h. The flask was flushed with N2 , and dry CH2 Cl2 (5 mL) was added. The flask was cooled to 0 °C and (ethylthio)trimethylsilane (72 μL, 0.44 mmol, 2.2 equiv) was added followed by tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (0.150 g, 0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The mixture was brought to rt and stirred for 4 h. The reaction was neutralised with triethylamine (0.1 mL) then concentrated in vacuo . The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (cHex/EtOAc, 8:1) to give the product as a colourless solid (0.11 g, 0.18 mmol, 61%). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 8.05–8.00 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.57 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.47–7.41 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.37–7.26 (m, 8 H, ArH), 7.21–7.17 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.16–7.08 (m, 5 H, ArH), 5.31 (dd, J = 10.0, 8.9 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 4.82 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.74 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.66 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.63 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.61–4.55 (m, 2 H, benzyl CH2 ), 4.53 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 3.84 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1 H, H-3), 3.81–3.71 (m, 3 H, H-4, H6a+b), 3.60–3.55 (m, 1 H, H-5), 2.73 (qd, J = 12.3, 7.4 Hz, 2 H, SCH2 ), 1.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, SCH2 CH3 ) ppm. 13 C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 165.4 (C=O), 138.3, 138.1, 137.9 (ArC), 133.3 (ArCH), 130.1 (ArC), 130.0, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.8, 127.8 (ArCH, 84.5 (C-3), 83.6 (C-1), 79.7 (C-5), 78.1 (C-4), 75.4 (benzyl CH2 ), 75.3 (benzyl CH2 ), 73.6 (benzyl CH2 ), 72.6 (C-2), 69.1 (C-6), 24.0 (SC H2 ), 15.1 (SCH2
C H3 ) ppm.
Spectra match literature reports:
14b
Poulsen LT,
Heuckendorff M,
Jensen HH.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16: 2269