Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83(09): 1117-1126
DOI: 10.1055/a-2143-8125
GebFra Science
Review/Übersicht

Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 3 – Expert Opinions of Early Stage Breast Cancer Therapies

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Hans-Christian Kolberg
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
,
Andreas D. Hartkopf
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
,
Tanja N. Fehm
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Manfred Welslau
4   Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany
,
Volkmar Müller
5   Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
,
Florian Schütz
6   Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
,
Peter A. Fasching
7   Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Wolfgang Janni
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
,
Isabell Witzel
8   Universitätsspital Zürich, Klinik für Gynäkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
,
Christoph Thomssen
9   Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
,
Milena Beierlein
7   Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Erik Belleville
10   ClinSol GmbH & Co. KG, Würzburg, Germany
,
Michael Untch
11   Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
,
Marc Thill
12   Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
,
Hans Tesch
13   Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
,
Nina Ditsch
14   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Michael P. Lux
15   Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
,
Bahriye Aktas
16   Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
,
Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
17   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
,
Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
18   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
,
Achim Wöckel
19   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
,
Nadia Harbeck
20   Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
,
Elmar Stickeler
21   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
,
Rupert Bartsch
22   Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Vienna, Austria
,
Andreas Schneeweiss
23   National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Johannes Ettl
24   Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Gynäkologie, Kempten, Germany
,
David Krug
25   Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Germany
,
Florin-Andrei Taran
26   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
,
Diana Lüftner
27   Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
28   Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
,
Rachel Würstlein
20   Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The St. Gallen (SG) International Breast Cancer Conference is held every two years, previously in St. Gallen and now in Vienna. This year (2023) marks the eighteenth edition of this conference, which focuses on the treatment of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. A panel discussion will be held at the end of this four-day event, during which a panel of experts will give their opinions on current controversial issues relating to the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. To this end, questions are generally formulated in such a way that clinically realistic cases are presented – often including poignant hypothetical modifications. This review reports on the outcome of these discussions and summarises the data associated with individual questions raised.

Key words

breast cancer - therapy recommendation - chemotherapy - endocrine therapy

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 29 June 2023

Accepted: 27 July 2023

Article published online:
12 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Partridge AH, Niman SM, Ruggeri M. et al. Pregnancy Outcome and Safety of Interrupting Therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2022; 2022: GS4-09
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu R. et al. A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 440-451
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J. et al. Breast Cancer Risk Genes – Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 428-439
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Couch FJ, Hart SN, Sharma P. et al. Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Fasching PA, Yadav S, Hu C. et al. Mutations in BRCA1/2 and Other Panel Genes in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer-Association With Patient and Disease Characteristics and Effect on Prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 1619-1630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rhiem K, Auber B, Briest S. et al. Consensus Recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17: 199-207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Rhiem K, Bucker-Nott HJ, Hellmich M. et al. Benchmarking of a checklist for the identification of familial risk for breast and ovarian cancers in a prospective cohort. Breast J 2019; 25: 455-460
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hauke J, Horvath J, Gross E. et al. Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1/2-negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Med 2018; 7: 1349-1358
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wunderle M, Gass P, Haberle L. et al. BRCA mutations and their influence on pathological complete response and prognosis in a clinical cohort of neoadjuvantly treated breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 171: 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Foulkes WD. The ten genes for breast (and ovarian) cancer susceptibility. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18: 259-260
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cardoso F, vanʼt Veer LJ, Bogaerts J. et al. 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 717-729
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Paik S, Shak S, Tang G. et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817-2826
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF. et al. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 111-121
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF. et al. Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2005-2014
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wang Y, Li Y, Liang J. et al. Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea and Its Prognostic Significance in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 859974
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Guerrero A, Gavila J, Folkerd E. et al. Incidence and predictors of ovarian function recovery (OFR) in breast cancer (BC) patients with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) who switched from tamoxifen to exemestane. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 674-679
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ruddy KJ, Schaid DJ, Partridge AH. et al. Genetic predictors of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 2019; 112: 731-739.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J. et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 805-816
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Gray RG, Rea D, Handley K. et al. and on behalf of the aTTom Collaborative Group. aTTom: Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 18_suppl. 5-5
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Petrelli F, Coinu A, Cabiddu M. et al. Five or more years of adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomised trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 140: 233-240
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S. et al. Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 1262-1271
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI. et al. Extending Aromatase-Inhibitor Adjuvant Therapy to 10 Years. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 209-219
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jakesz R, Greil R, Gnant M. et al. Extended adjuvant therapy with anastrozole among postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results from the randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 6a. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 1845-1853
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mamounas EP, Bandos H, Lembersky BC. et al. Ten-year results from NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (L) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor+ breast cancer (BC) who have completed previous adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI). San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2019; 2019: GS4-01
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Del Mastro L, Mansutti M, Bisagni G. et al. Extended therapy with letrozole as adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22: 1458-1467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Gnant M, Fitzal F, Rinnerthaler G. et al. Duration of Adjuvant Aromatase-Inhibitor Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 395-405
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Johnston SRD, Toi M, OʼShaughnessy J. et al. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24: 77-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Harbeck N, Rastogi P, Martin M. et al. Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: updated efficacy and Ki-67 analysis from the monarchE study. Ann Oncol 2021; 32: 1571-1581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R. et al. monarchE Committee Members and Investigators. Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE). J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 3987-3998
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Slamon D, Stroyakovskiy D, Yardley D. et al. Phase III NATALEE trial of ribociclib + endocrine therapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer. ASCO Annual Meeting 2023; 2023: LBA500
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Tarantino P, Burstein HJ, Lin NU. et al. Should Ki-67 be adopted to select breast cancer patients for treatment with adjuvant abemaciclib?. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: 234-238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Royce M, Mulkey F, Osgood C. et al. US Food and Drug Administration Expanded Adjuvant Indication of Abemaciclib in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 3456-3457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA expands early breast cancer indication for abemaciclib with endocrine therapy. 2023. Accessed April 03, 2023 at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-expands-early-breast-cancer-indication-abemaciclib-endocrine-therapy
    PubMed
  • 34 Coutant C, Olivier C, Lambaudie E. et al. Comparison of Models to Predict Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2800-2808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Breast Cancer Nomogram: Breast Additional Non SLN Metastases. 2023. Accessed April 02, 2023 at: https://nomograms.mskcc.org/Breast/BreastAdditionalNonSLNMetastasesPage.aspx
    PubMed
  • 36 MD Anderson Cancer Center. Breast Cancer Nomogram to Predict Additional Positive Non-SLN, without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. 2023. Accessed April 03, 2023 at: http://www3.mdanderson.org/app/medcalc/bc_nomogram2
    PubMed
  • 37 Sparano J, Gray RJ, Makower D. et al. Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx): An update including 12-year event rates. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2022; 2022: GS1-05
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Geyer jr. CE, Garber JE, Gelber RD. et al. Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: 1250-1268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B. et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 2394-2405
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R. et al. Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 556-567
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L. et al. Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 810-821
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Bonadio RC, Tarantino P, Testa L. et al. Management of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer following pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy: What are the evidences?. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 110: 102459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Ditsch N, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Friedrich M. et al. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2021. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16: 214-227
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Fasching PA, Hein A, Kolberg HC. et al. Pembrolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer – A single-arm phase II trial (NeoImmunoboost, AGO-B-041). Eur J Cancer 2023; 184: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Hahnen E, Lederer B, Hauke J. et al. Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 1378-1385
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E. et al. Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 122-131
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Piccart M, Procter M, Fumagalli D. et al. APHINITY Steering Committee and Investigators. Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the APHINITY Trial: 6 Yearsʼ Follow-Up. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 1448-1457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Loibl S, Jassem J, Sonnenblick A. et al. Updated Results of Aphinity at 8.4 years median follow up. ESMO Virtual Plenary 2022; July 14, 2022.
    PubMed
  • 49 von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS. et al. Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 617-628
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Martin M, Holmes FA, Ejlertsen B. et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): 5-year analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 1688-1700
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Chan A, Moy B, Mansi J. et al. Final Efficacy Results of Neratinib in HER2-positive Hormone Receptor-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer From the Phase III ExteNET Trial. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21: 80-91.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Chan A, Delaloge S, Holmes FA. et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 367-377
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Clinicaltrials.gov. A Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in High-risk HER2-positive Participants With Residual Invasive Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy (DESTINY-Breast05). 2022. Accessed December 28, 2022 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04622319
    PubMed
  • 54 Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K. et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 120: 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Gnerlich J, Dueker JM, Jeffe DB. et al. Patient and tumor characteristics associated with primary tumor resection in women with Stage IV breast cancer: analysis of 1988–2003 SEER data. Breast J 2008; 14: 538-542
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Le Scodan R, Stevens D, Brain E. et al. Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: survival impact of exclusive locoregional radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1375-1381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Ali D, Le Scodan R. Treatment of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Di Lascio S, Pagani O. Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: A Shift from Palliative to Potentially Curative Treatment?. Breast Care 2014; 9: 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Cullinane C, Fleming C, OʼLeary DP. et al. Association of Circulating Tumor DNA With Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open 2020; 3: e2026921-e2026921
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Sant M, Bernat-Peguera A, Felip E. et al. Role of ctDNA in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2022; 14: 310
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Croessmann S, Park BH. Circulating tumor DNA in early-stage breast cancer: new directions and potential clinical applications. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2021; 19: 155-161
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Trapp E, Janni W, Schindlbeck C. et al. Presence of Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer During Follow-Up and Prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111: 380-387
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Huebner H, Haberle L, Muller V. et al. MUC1 (CA27.29) before and after Chemotherapy and Prognosis in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 clinicaltrials.gov. Standard Surveillance vs. Intensive Surveillance in Early Breast Cancer (SURVIVE). 2023. Accessed April 15, 2023 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05658172
    PubMed
  • 65 Stickeler E, Aktas B, Behrens A. et al. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 1 – Prevention and Early Stages. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81: 526-538
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Stiftung SONK St.Gallen Oncology Conferences. Faculty Members – 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2023. 2023. Accessed March 10, 2023 at: https://www.oncoconferences.ch/events/sgbcc-2023/
    PubMed