Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2148-8036
Buy or Build: Challenges Developing Consumer Digital Health Interventions
Funding CONDUIT-HID was funded by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant no.: R18 HS018461). USE-MI was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (grant no.: R01 MH109319).
Abstract
Background Digital health interventions offer opportunities to improve collaborative care between clinicians and patients. Designing and implementing digital health interventions requires decisions about buying or building each technology-related component, all of which can lead to unanticipated issues.
Objectives This study aimed to describe issues encountered from our “buy or build” decisions developing two digital health interventions over different timeframes, designed to use patient-generated health data to: (1) improve hypertension control and (2) measure and improve adherence to HIV-related medications.
Methods CONDUIT-HID (CONtrolling Disease Using Information Technology-Hypertension In Diabetes) was developed during 2010 to 2015 to allow patients receiving care from a multispecialty group practice to easily upload home blood pressure readings into their electronic health record and trigger clinician action if mean blood pressure values indicated inadequate control. USE-MI (Unobtrusive SEnsing of Medication Intake) was developed from 2016 to 2022 to allow entry of patients' HIV-related medication regimens, send reminders if patients had not taken their medications by the scheduled time(s), attempt to detect medication ingestion through machine learning analysis of smartwatch motion data, and present graphical adherence summaries to patients and clinicians.
Results Both projects required multiple “buy or build” decisions across all system components, including data collection, transfer, analysis, and display. We used commercial, off-the-shelf technology where possible, but virtually all of these components still required substantial custom development. We found that, even though our projects spanned years, issues related to our “buy or build” decisions stemmed from several common themes, including mismatches between existing and new technologies, our use case being new or unanticipated, technology stability, technology longevity, and resource limitations.
Conclusion Those designing and implementing digital health interventions need to make numerous “buy or build” decisions as they create the technologies that underpin their intervention. These “buy or build” decisions, and the ensuing issues that will arise because of them, require careful planning, particularly if they represent an “edge case” use of existing commercial systems.
Keywords
digital technology - hypertension - medication adherence - patient participation - consumer health informaticsProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The studies were performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and were reviewed by the University of Massachusetts Medical School and Swedish Health Services Institutional Review Boards.
Publication History
Received: 01 February 2023
Accepted: 30 June 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
04 August 2023
Article published online:
11 October 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Conceptualizing a Data Infrastructure for the Capture, Use, and Sharing of Patient-Generated Health Data in Care Delivery and Research through 2024 (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology). 2018 . Accessed January 25, 2023 at https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/onc_pghd_practical_guide.pdf
- 2 Integrating Patient-Generated Digital Health Data into Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care Settings: An Environmental Scan. 2021 . AHRQ Publication No. 21-0031. Accessed January 25, 2023 at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/pghd-environmental-scan.pdf
- 3 Mobius MD. 11 surprising mobile health statistics. Accessed April 29, 2023 at: https://mobius.md/2021/10/25/11-mobile-health-statistics
- 4 Sensor Tower. U.S. mobile devices saw an average of 47 apps used per month last year. Accessed April 29, 2023 at: https://sensortower.com/blog/number-of-apps-used-per-device-2021/
- 5 Insider Intelligence. Latest trends in medical monitoring devices and wearable health technology (2023). Insider Intelligence. Accessed April 29, 2023 at: https://www.insiderintelligence.com/insights/wearable-technology-healthcare-medical-devices/
- 6 Marquard J. Human factors and organizational issues in health informatics: innovations and opportunities. Yearb Med Inform 2021; 30 (01) 91-99
- 7 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Conceptualizing a data infrastructure for the capture, use, and sharing of patient-generated health data in care delivery and research through 2024. Accessed January 25, 2023 at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/onc_pghd_practical_guide.pdf
- 8 Lai AM, Hsueh PS, Choi YK, Austin RR. Present and future trends in consumer health informatics and patient-generated health data. Yearb Med Inform 2017; 26 (01) 152-159
- 9 Tiase VL, Hull W, McFarland MM. et al. Patient-generated health data and electronic health record integration: a scoping review. JAMIA Open 2020; 3 (04) 619-627
- 10 Schreiweis B, Pobiruchin M, Strotbaum V, Suleder J, Wiesner M, Bergh B. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of eHealth services: systematic literature analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (11) e14197
- 11 Abdolkhani R, Gray K, Borda A, DeSouza R. Patient-generated health data management and quality challenges in remote patient monitoring. JAMIA Open 2019; 2 (04) 471-478
- 12 Adler-Milstein J, Nong P. Early experiences with patient generated health data: health system and patient perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 952-959
- 13 Aljedaani B, Babar MA. Challenges with developing secure mobile health applications: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9 (06) e15654
- 14 James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL. et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 2014; 311 (05) 507-520
- 15 Public Health Informatics Institute. Self-measured blood pressure monitoring: key findings from a national health information technology landscape analysis. Accessed January 25, 2023 at: https://phii.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/PHII-Report-on-SMBP_FINAL.pdf
- 16 Lobach DF, Boxwala A, Kashyap N. et al. Integrating a patient engagement app into an electronic health record-enabled workflow using interoperability standards. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 1163-1171
- 17 Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hypertension in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (16) 1650-1656
- 18 Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS. et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71 (06) 1269-1324
- 19 Demiris G, Iribarren SJ, Sward K, Lee S, Yang R. Patient generated health data use in clinical practice: a systematic review. Nurs Outlook 2019; 67 (04) 311-330
- 20 Koppel R, Lehmann CU. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (02) 465-471
- 21 Maas B. Digital therapeutics. Accessed January 25, 2023 at: https://www.rxbenefits.com/blogs/digital-therapeutics/
- 22 Kiaghadi A, Hu P, Gummeson J, Rostaminia S, Ganesan D. Continuous measurement of interactions with the physical world with a wrist-worn backscatter reader. ACM Trans Internet Things 2020; 1 (02) 1-22