PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2023; 08(02): e125-e132
DOI: 10.1055/a-2162-0604
Original Article

Industry Payments and Academic Influence in Reconstructive Microsurgery

Ila Sethi
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
,
Joseph A. Mellia
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
,
Alexander I. Murphy
3   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
,
Fortunay Diatta
4   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Paul Asadourian
5   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
John P. Fischer
6   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Saïd C. Azoury
6   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Duc T. Bui
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Financial relationships between industry and microsurgeons help facilitate innovation but have the potential to bias a surgeon's academic work. To better understand industry–academic relationships, this study investigated the association between industry payments made to microsurgeons and their academic influence.

Methods A cross-sectional analysis of microsurgeons at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited plastic surgery residency programs during the 2020–2021 academic year was performed. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Open Payments Database was used to collect industry payments (research and nonresearch related) to each surgeon. Academic influence was measured by Hirsch index (h-index) and number of publications. Mann–Whitney's U and Kruskal–Wallis' tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results Of the 199 microsurgeons identified, 156 (78.39%) received an industry nonresearch payment, but 0 (0.0%) received an industry research payment. Surgeons who received any amount of industry payments did not have a higher mean h-index or higher mean number of publications than surgeons with no industry payments. However, surgeons with total industry payments more than $10,000 (n = 15) had a higher number of publications than surgeons with no industry payments (135.47 vs. 36.02, p = 0.0074), $1 to $1,000 in payments (135.47 vs. 34.37, p = 0.0006), and $1,000 to $10,000 in payments (135.47 vs. 45.43, p = 0.0268). Surgeons with total industry payments more than $10,000 also had higher h-indices than surgeons with $1 to $1,000 in payments (24.4 vs. 10.34, p = 0.0039) and $1,000 to $10,000 in payments (24.4 vs. 11.34, p = 0.0413).

Conclusion Industry funding is associated with higher h-index and higher number of publications for high earners (> $10,000). Private companies may favor these surgeons for their academic expertise.

Keywords

industry funding - microsurgery - surgical innovation - academic surgeon - plastic surgery


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 06. November 2022

Angenommen: 31. Juli 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29. August 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. Dezember 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Çolak Ö, Mutlu ÖÖ, Özer K. Effects of technological innovations on reconstructive microsurgery; flap monitoring systems after free tissue transfer, yesterday and today. Eur Arch Med Res 2018; 34 (01) S61-S65 DOI: 10.5752/eamr.2018.59244.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bailey CS, Fehlings MG, Rampersaud YR, Hall H, Wai EK, Fisher CG. Industry and evidence-based medicine: Believable or conflicted? A systematic review of the surgical literature. Can J Surg 2011; 54 (05) 321-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289 (04) 454-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Momeni A, Becker A, Bannasch H, Antes G, Blümle A, Stark GB. Association between research sponsorship and study outcome in plastic surgery literature. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (06) 661-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Luce EA. Financial conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: background, potential for bias, disclosure, and transparency. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 1149-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lopez J, Juan I, Wu A. et al. The impact of financial conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: are they all created equal?. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77 (02) 226-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 111th United States Congress (2009–2010). Accessed January 31, 2021, at: https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ148/PLAW-111publ148.pdf
    PubMed
  • 8 What is the Open Payments Program? Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Accessed January 31, 2021, at: https://www.cms.gov/OpenPayments
    PubMed
  • 9 Ziai K, Pigazzi A, Smith BR. et al. Association of compensation from the surgical and medical device industry to physicians and self-declared conflict of interest. JAMA Surg 2018; 153 (11) 997-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ruan QZ, Cohen JB, Baek Y. et al. Does industry funding mean more publications for subspecialty academic plastic surgeons?. J Surg Res 2018; 224: 185-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46) 16569-16572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Natures of Payment. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Accessed January 31, 2021, at: https://www.cms.gov/OpenPayments/Natures-of-Payment
    PubMed
  • 13 Chao AH, Gangopadhyay N. Industry financial relationships in plastic surgery: analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 341e-348e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Buerba RA, Sheppard WL, Herndon KE. et al. Academic influence and its relationship to industry payments in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (09) e59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chen AZ, Bovonratwet P, Murphy AI, Ang BK, Shen TS, Su EP. Industry payments and their association with academic influence in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (08) 3004-3009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fazendin JM, Corey BL, Heslin MJ, Chen H. Analysis of Open Payments receipts among surgical faculty at a large academic institution. J Surg Res 2019; 244: 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Balch JA, Cooper LA, Filiberto AC, Chan PE, Sarosi GA, Tan SA. Prevalence and extent of industry support for program directors of surgical fellowships in the United States. [published correction appears in Surgery. 2021 Jun;169(6):1564] Surgery 2020; 168 (06) 1101-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gray R, Tanna N, Kasabian AK. Conflict of interest at plastic surgery conferences: is it significant?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (02) 308e-313e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ha G, Gray R, Clappier M, Tanna N, Kasabian AK. Conflict of interest at microsurgery conferences: disclosure of its extent and nature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (05) 390-394
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Khetpal S, Mets EJ, Ahmad M. et al. The Open Payments Sunshine Act Database revisited: a 5-year analysis of industry payments to plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (05) 877e-878e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Singerman KW, Moore MG, Kortlever JTP, Gobble RM. Industry payments to plastic surgeons, 2013 to 2018: who's getting paid?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (01) 264-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ngaage LM, Harris C, Landford W. et al. Follow the money: investigating gender disparity in industry payments among senior academics and leaders in plastic surgery. PLoS One 2020; 15 (12) e0235058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ruan QZ, Cohen JB, Baek Y. et al. Identifying sources of funding that contribute to scholastic productivity in academic plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (4, suppl 4): S214-S218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ziai K, Sahyouni R, Moshtaghi O. et al. An analysis of the Open Payment Database in neurotology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 158 (02) 319-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Babu MA, Heary RF, Nahed BV. Does the Open Payments database provide sunshine on neurosurgery?. Neurosurgery 2016; 79 (06) 933-938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ngaage LM, Harris C, Rosen C. et al. Sex disparity in academic rank and industry payments to plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (02) 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Moore MG, Singerman KW, Kitzmiller WJ, Gobble RM. Gender disparity in 2013–2018 industry payments to plastic surgeons. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (11) 1316-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ruan QZ, Ricci JA, Silvestre J, Ho OA, Lee BT. Academic productivity of faculty associated with microsurgery fellowships. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (06) 641-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar