Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2023; 240(11): 1284-1291
DOI: 10.1055/a-2162-7758
Der interessante Fall

Considerations on the Calculation of Multifocal Duet Implantation in a Monovision Scenario for the Correction of Presbyopia – A Case Example

Überlegungen zur Berechnung einer multifokalen Duett-Implantation in einem darunter liegenden Monovisionsszenario zur Korrektur der Presbyopie – Veranschaulichung Anhand eines Fallbeispiels
Neal Rangu
1   The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, United States
,
Theo G. Seiler
2   Institute for refractive and ophthalmic surgery (IROC), Zürich, Switzerland
3   Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
4   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Kamran M. Riaz 
5   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma, Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
,
David L. Cooke
6   Great Lakes Eye Care, St. Joseph, Michigan, United States
7   Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
,
Achim Langenbucher
8   Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
,
Isaak Raphael Fischinger
9   Eye Day Clinic at the Spreebogen, Berlin, Germany
10   Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
,
Thomas Kohnen 
11   Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Jascha Wendelstein 
2   Institute for refractive and ophthalmic surgery (IROC), Zürich, Switzerland
8   Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
10   Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Case

A 56-year-old male warehouse worker was referred for treatment of early cataract, presbyopia, and hyperopia. The patient stated a reliance on reading glasses for near-vision activities. However, the patient reported dissatisfaction with wearing progressive glasses and previous contact lens intolerance. Additionally, he reported dissatisfaction with nighttime vision, including driving, and difficulty with hobbies, including motorcycling and photography. His past medical history was notable for psoriasis, though he was not taking any systemic medications. The past ocular history was also unremarkable, and he reported no ocular pain or discomfort at the time of presentation.



Publication History

Received: 06 March 2023

Accepted: 21 August 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 August 2023

Article published online:
15 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Li H, Lim JH, Liu J. et al. Towards automatic grading of nuclear cataract. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 2007: 4961-4964
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 de Vries NE, Webers CAB, Touwslager WRH. et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 859-865
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Yildirim TM. et al. Reversibility of the duet procedure: Bilateral exchange of a supplementary trifocal sulcus-fixated intraocular lens for correction of a postoperative refractive error. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2020; 20: 100957
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Feldhaus L, Mayer WJ, Siedlecki J. et al. Myope multifokale Duett-Implantation zur Korrektur von Presbyopie und Myopie. Ophthalmologie 2023; 120: 759-762
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gayton JL, Apple DJ, Peng Q. et al. Interlenticular opacification: clinicopathological correlation of a complication of posterior chamber piggyback intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 330-336
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Chang DF, Masket S, Miller KM. et al. Complications of sulcus placement of single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses: recommendations for backup IOL implantation following posterior capsule rupture. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1445-1458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kahraman G, Amon M. New supplementary intraocular lens for refractive enhancement in pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1090-1094
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Khan MI, Muhtaseb M. Performance of the Sulcoflex piggyback intraocular lens in pseudophakic patients. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 693-696
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Prager F, Amon M, Wiesinger J. et al. Capsular bag-fixated and ciliary sulcus-fixated intraocular lens centration after supplementary intraocular lens implantation in the same eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43: 643-647
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Łabuz G. et al. Clinical Outcomes in Patients After Duet Procedure for Reversible Trifocality Using a Supplementary Trifocal Intraocular Lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 241: 217-226
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kahraman G, Dragostinoff N, Brezna W. et al. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Sequential Implantation of a Capsular Bag IOL and a Supplementary Sulcus-Fixated Trifocal IOL. J Refract Surg 2021; 37: 105-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Łabuz G, Auffarth GU, Knorz MC. et al. Trifocality Achieved Through Polypseudophakia: Optical Quality and Light Loss Compared With a Single Trifocal Intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg 2020; 36: 570-577
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wendelstein JA, Hinterberger S, Hoffmann PC. et al. Evaluation of phakic intraocular lens power calculation using the new Linz-Homburg-Castrop formula and comparison with four conventional methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 2023; 49: 119-125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Langenbucher A, Szentmáry N, Cayless A. et al. Prediction of the axial lens position after cataract surgery using deep learning algorithms and multilinear regression. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100: e1378-e1384
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Langenbucher A, Szentmáry N, Cayless A. et al. Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0252102
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Langenbucher A, Szentmáry N, Cayless A. et al. The Castrop formula for calculation of toric intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 259: 3321-3331
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Liekfeld A, Ehmer A, Schröter U. Visual function and reading speed after bilateral implantation of 2 types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: Add-on versus capsular bag design. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2107-2114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Khoramnia R, Yildirim TM, Son HS. et al. Reversible Trifokalität durch das Duett-Verfahren. Ophthalmologe 2020; 117: 999-1004
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Meyer JJ, McGhee CNJ. Supplementary, Sulcus-Fixated Intraocular Lens in the Treatment of Spherical and Astigmatic Refractive Errors in Pseudophakic Eyes After Keratoplasty. Cornea 2015; 34: 1052-1056
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Srinivasan S, Ting DSJ, Lyall DAM. Implantation of a customized toric intraocular lens for correction of post-keratoplasty astigmatism. Eye (Lond) 2013; 27: 531-537
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ferreira TB, Pinheiro J. Clinical results with a supplementary toric intraocular lens for the correction of astigmatism in pseudophakic patients. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015; 25: 302-308
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 McLintock CA, McKelvie J, Gatzioufas Z. et al. Outcomes of toric supplementary intraocular lenses for residual astigmatic refractive error in pseudophakic eyes. Int Ophthalmol 2019; 39: 1965-1972
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a Secondary Toric Sulcus Intraocular Lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14: 1337-1342
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Eppig T, Viestenz A, Seitz B. et al. Berechnung pseudophaker torischer Intraokularlinsen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2011; 228: 681-689
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Holladay JT. Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 116: 63-66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Langenbucher A, Viestenz A, Szentmáry N. et al. Pseudophake und phake torische Linsen zur Korrektur des kornealen Astigmatismus – Theorie und klinische Aspekte. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2008; 225: 541-547
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Langenbucher A, Szentmáry N, Cayless A. et al. Prediction of ocular magnification and aniseikonia after cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100: e1675-e1684
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A. et al. Meridional ocular magnification after cataract surgery with toric and non-toric intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 260: 3869-3882
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A. et al. Considerations of a thick lens formula for intraocular lens power calculation. Z Med Phys 2022;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Langenbucher A, Szentmáry N, Cayless A. et al. Monte-Carlo simulation of a thick lens IOL power calculation. Acta Ophthalmol 2023;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar