Verletzungen der oberen Halswirbelsäule

Zusammenfassung

Durch ihre komplexe Funktion und Anatomie ist es sinnvoll die axiale Halswirbelsäule von der subaxialen zu unterscheiden. Verletzungen dieser Region sind vielfältig und nicht immer einfach zu diagnostizieren. Hilfreich für die Indikationsstellung zur bildgebenden Diagnostik sind die Canadian C-Spine-Rules.

Einfache Frakturen können mittels Zervikalorthese konservativ behandelt werden. Die Halotraktion ist für alle Verletzungsentitäten bis auf die transdentale C1/C2-Instabilität eine semikonservative Behandlunsgsoption.

Instabile Verletzungen bedürfen einer operativen Intervention. Für eine differenzierte Therapieentscheidung sind die vielfältigen Klassifikationssysteme hilfreich. Neben der Darstellung der bewährten Einteilungsprinzipien liegt in besonderes Augenmerk in diesem Aufsatz auf der jüngst veröffentlichten AOSpine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Klassifikation. Diese propagiert eine stärker segmentbezogene Denkweise und stellt einen sehr attraktiven Ansatz dar, da sich aus den Zuordnungen relativ einfach therapeutische Konsequenzen ableiten lassen. Sehr viele spezifische Aspekte der etablierten Klassifikationssysteme sind ebenfalls über Modifikatoren mit abbildbar.

Es werden typische Verletzungsmuster von der Diagnostik über Indikationsstellung bis hin zur Therapie dargestellt. Hervorzuheben sind hierbei die Goel/Harms-Verschraubung, die transartikuläre Verschraubung nach Magerl, die aszendierende Densosteosynthese und die Okzipitozervikale Fusion.

Abstract

Due to its complex function and anatomy, it is useful to distinguish the axial cervical spine from the subaxial spine. Injuries in this region are varied and not always easy to diagnose. The Canadian C-spine rules are helpful in determining the indication for diagnostic imaging. Simple fractures can be treated conservatively using a cervical orthosis. Halotraction is a semi-conservative treatment option for all injury entities except transdental C1/C2 instability. Unstable injuries require surgical intervention. The various classification systems are helpful for a differentiated treatment decision. In addition to presenting the proven classification principles, this article focuses in particular on the recently published AOSpine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification. This propagates a more segment-related way of thinking and represents a very attractive approach, as therapeutic consequences can be derived relatively easily from the classifications. Many specific aspects of the established classification systems can also be mapped using modifiers, and typical injury patterns are presented, from diagnosis and indication through to treatment. The Goel/Harms screw fixation, the transarticular screw fixation according to Magerl, the ascending densosteosynthesis and the occipitocervical fusion should be emphasized here.

Schlüsselwörter

obere Halswirbelsäule - Verletzung - Behandlung - Klassifikation

Keywords

upper cervical spine - injury - treatment - classification

Publication History

Article published online:
13 February 2024

• Referenzen

• 1 Rupp M, Walter N, Pfeifer C. et al. The incidence of fractures among the adult population of Germany: an analysis from 2009 through 2019. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2021; 118: 665
• 2 Fredø HL, Rizvi SAM, Lied B. et al. The epidemiology of traumatic cervical spine fractures: a prospective population study from Norway. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2012; 20: 1-7
• 3 Utheim NC, Josefsen R, Nakstad PH. et al. Occipital condyle fracture and lower cranial nerve palsy after blunt head trauma–a literature review and case report. Journal of trauma management & outcomes 2015; 9: 1-7
• 4 Wakao N, Takeuchi M, Nishimura M. et al. Vertebral artery variations and osseous anomaly at the C1–2 level diagnosed by 3D CT angiography in normal subjects. Neuroradiology 2014; 56: 843-849
• 5 Klepinowski T, Pala B, Cembik J. et al. Prevalence of high-riding vertebral artery: a meta-analysis of the anatomical variant affecting choice of craniocervical fusion method and its outcome. World Neurosurgery 2020; 143: e474-e481
• 6 Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL. et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. Jama 2012; 86: 1841-1848
• 7 Griffen MM, Frykberg ER, Kerwin AJ. et al. Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan?. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2003; 55: 222-227
• 8 Panczykowski DM, Tomycz ND, Okonkwo DO. Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma: A review. Journal of neurosurgery 2011; 115: 541-549
• 9 Fassett DR, Dailey AT, Vaccaro AR. Vertebral artery injuries associated with cervical spine injuries: a review of the literature. Clinical Spine Surgery 2008; 21: 252-258
• 10 Goradia D, Linnau K, Cohen W. et al. Correlation of MR imaging findings with intraoperative findings after cervical spine trauma. American journal of neuroradiology 2007; 28: 209-215
• 11 Griffiths HJ, Wagner J, Anglen J. et al. The use of forced flexion/extension views in the obtunded trauma patient. Skeletal radiology 2002; 31: 587-591
• 12 Insko EK, Gracias VH, Gupta R. et al. Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2002; 53: 426-429
• 13 Vaccaro AR, Karamian BA, Levy HA. et al. Update on Upper Cervical Injury Classifications: The New AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System. Clinical Spine Surgery 2021; 35: 249-255
• 14 Vaccaro AR, Lambrechts MJ, Karamian BA. et al. AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: a description and reliability study. The spine journal 2022; 22: 2042-2049
• 15 Anderson PA, Montesano PX. Morphology and treatment of occipital condyle fractures. Spine 1988; 13: 731-736
• 16 Bertalanffy H, Seeger W. The dorsolateral, suboccipital, transcondylar approach to the lower clivus and anterior portion of the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 815-821
• 17 Maserati MB, Stephens B, Zohny Z. et al. Occipital condyle fractures: clinical decision rule and surgical management. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2009; 11: 388-395
• 18 Traynelis VC, Marano GD, Dunker RO. et al. Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation: case report. Journal of neurosurgery 1986; 65: 863-870
• 19 Mueller FJ, Kinner B, Rosskopf M. et al. Incidence and outcome of atlanto-occipital dissociation at a level 1 trauma centre: a prospective study of five cases within 5 years. European Spine Journal 2013; 22: 65-71
• 20 Gehweiler JA, Osborne RL, Becker RF. The radiology of vertebral trauma. vol 16. WB Saunders Company,; 1980
• 21 Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 2001; 26: 2467-2471
• 22 Koller H, Resch H, Tauber M. et al. A biomechanical rationale for C1-ring osteosynthesis as treatment for displaced Jefferson burst fractures with incompetency of the transverse atlantal ligament. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2010; 19: 1288-1298
• 23 Shatsky J, Bellabarba C, Nguyen Q. et al. A retrospective review of fixation of C1 ring fractures—does the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) really matter?. The Spine Journal 2016; 16: 372-379
• 24 Dickman CA, Greene KA, Sonntag VK. Injuries involving the transverse atlantal ligament: classification and treatment guidelines based upon experience with 39 injuries. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 44-50
• 25 De la Caffinière J, Seringe R, Roy-Camille R. et al. Physio-pathological study of severe ligament lesions in injuries of the spino-occipital joint. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de L'appareil Moteur 1972; 58: 11-19
• 26 Anderson LD, D'Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1974; 56: 1663-1674
• 27 Eysel P, Roosen K. Ventral or dorsal spondylodesis in dens basal fracture--a new classification for choice of surgical approach. Zentralbl Neurochir 1993; 54: 159-165
• 28 Bohler J. Anterior stabilization for acute fractures and non-unions of the dens. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American 1982; 64: 18-27
• 29 Osterhoff G, Scholz M, Disch AC. et al. Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review. Global Spine Journal 2023; 13 (Suppl. 01) 13S-21S
• 30 Brakopp FH, Mendel T, Klauke F. et al. Der Halofixateur zur Therapie von instabilen Frakturen der oberen Halswirbelsäule–eigene Erfahrungen und narratives Review. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 2023;
• 31 Scholz M, Schnake KJ, Hoffmann R. et al. Cement-augmented anterior odontoid screw fixation of a Anderson-D'Alonzo type II fracture with massive osteoporosis. Case report. Z Orthop Unfall 2011; 149: 308-311
• 32 Benzel EC, Hart BL, Ball PA. et al. Fractures of the C-2 vertebral body. Journal of neurosurgery 1994; 81: 206-212
• 33 Levine AM, Edwards C. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. JBJS 1985; 67: 217-226
• 34 Josten C. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Orthopade 1999; 28: 394-400
• 35 Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL. et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1841-1848