Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83(11): 1331-1349
DOI: 10.1055/a-2169-8539
GebFra Science
Guideline/Leitlinie

Bakterielle Vaginose: Leitlinie der DGGG, OEGGG und SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF-Registernummer 015/028, Juni 2023)

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Alex Farr
1   Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Abteilung für Geburtshilfe und feto-maternale Medizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
,
Sonja Swidsinski
2   MDI Limbach Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany
,
Daniel Surbek
3   Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Feto-maternale Medizin, Inselspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
,
Brigitte Frey Tirri
4   Frauenklinik, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
,
Birgit Willinger
5   Abteilung für Klinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
,
Udo Hoyme
6   Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ilm-Kreis-Kliniken, Arnstadt, Germany
,
Gisela Walter
7   Ärztliche Gesellschaft zur Gesundheitsförderung e. V. (ÄGGF), Hamburg, Germany
8   Deutsche STI-Gesellschaft (DSTIG), Bochum, Germany
,
Inge Reckel-Botzem
9   Berufsverband der Frauenärzte e. V. (BVF), Landesverband Hessen, Hainburg, Germany
,
Werner Mendling
10   Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionen in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Wuppertal, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Das Ziel dieser offiziellen Leitlinie, die von der DGGG, OEGGG und SGGG unter Beteiligung weiterer Gesellschaften publiziert und koordiniert wurde, ist es, durch die Evaluation der relevanten Literatur einen konsensbasierten Überblick über die Diagnostik und das Management der bakteriellen Vaginose zu geben.

Methoden Diese S2k-Leitlinie wurde durch einen strukturierten Konsens von repräsentativen Mitgliedern verschiedener Professionen im Auftrag der Leitlinienkommission der genannten Gesellschaften entwickelt.

Empfehlungen Diese Leitlinie gibt Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik, Management, Beratung, Prophylaxe und weiteren Aspekten der bakteriellen Vaginose.

Schlüsselwörter

bakterielle Vaginose - Infektion - Leitlinie


Publication History

Received: 28 August 2023

Accepted: 29 August 2023

Article published online:
03 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Peebles K, Velloza J, Balkus JE. et al. High Global Burden and Costs of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Transm Dis 2019; 46: 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V. et al. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1013-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hill GB. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 450-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vaneechoutte M, Guschin A, Van Simaey L. et al. Emended description of Gardnerella vaginalis and description of Gardnerella leopoldii sp. nov., Gardnerella piotii sp. nov. and Gardnerella swidsinskii sp. nov., with delineation of 13 genomic species within the genus Gardnerella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69: 679-687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 van Esbroeck M, Vandamme P, Falsen E. et al. Polyphasic approach to the classification and identification of Gardnerella vaginalis and unidentified Gardnerella vaginalis-like coryneforms present in bacterial vaginosis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46: 675-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sadhu K, Domingue PA, Chow AW. et al. Gardnerella vaginalis has a gram-positive cell-wall ultrastructure and lacks classical cell-wall lipopolysaccharide. J Med Microbiol 1989; 29: 229-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Patterson JL, Stull-Lane A, Girerd PH. et al. Analysis of adherence, biofilm formation and cytotoxicity suggests a greater virulence potential of Gardnerella vaginalis relative to other bacterial-vaginosis-associated anaerobes. Microbiology (Reading) 2010; 156: 392-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wertz J, Isaacs-Cosgrove N, Holzman C. et al. Temporal Shifts in Microbial Communities in Nonpregnant African-American Women with and without Bacterial Vaginosis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2008; 2008: 181253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shipitsyna E, Roos A, Datcu R. et al. Composition of the vaginal microbiota in women of reproductive age–sensitive and specific molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is possible?. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rosca AS, Castro J, Sousa LGV. et al. Gardnerella and vaginal health: the truth is out there. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2020; 44: 73-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bradshaw CS, Sobel JD. Current Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis-Limitations and Need for Innovation. J Infect Dis 2016; 214 (Suppl. 01) S14-S20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Swidsinski A, Verstraelen H, Loening-Baucke V. et al. Presence of a polymicrobial endometrial biofilm in patients with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e53997
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sewankambo N, Gray RH, Wawer MJ. et al. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. Lancet 1997; 350: 546-550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cauci S, Monte R, Driussi S. et al. Impairment of the mucosal immune system: IgA and IgM cleavage detected in vaginal washings of a subgroup of patients with bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 1998; 178: 1698-1706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Nuytinck L. et al. Gene polymorphisms of Toll-like and related recognition receptors in relation to the vaginal carriage of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae. J Reprod Immunol 2009; 79: 163-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z. et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108 (Suppl. 01) 4680-4687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Borgdorff H, van der Veer C, van Houdt R. et al. The association between ethnicity and vaginal microbiota composition in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0181135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bautista CT, Wurapa E, Sateren WB. et al. Bacterial vaginosis: a synthesis of the literature on etiology, prevalence, risk factors, and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil Med Res 2016; 3: 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 505-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Martin DH. The microbiota of the vagina and its influence on womenʼs health and disease. Am J Med Sci 2012; 343: 2-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Marrazzo JM, Fiedler TL, Srinivasan S. et al. Extravaginal reservoirs of vaginal bacteria as risk factors for incident bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 2012; 205: 1580-1588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bradshaw CS, Walker SM, Vodstrcil LA. et al. The influence of behaviors and relationships on the vaginal microbiota of women and their female partners: the WOW Health Study. J Infect Dis 2014; 209: 1562-1572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Brookheart RT, Lewis WG, Peipert JF. et al. Association between obesity and bacterial vaginosis as assessed by Nugent score. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 476.e1-476.e11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Swidsinski A, Doerffel Y, Loening-Baucke V. et al. Gardnerella biofilm involves females and males and is transmitted sexually. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2010; 70: 256-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Swidsinski A, Dorffel Y, Loening-Baucke V. et al. Desquamated epithelial cells covered with a polymicrobial biofilm typical for bacterial vaginosis are present in randomly selected cryopreserved donor semen. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010; 59: 399-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Zozaya M, Ferris MJ, Siren JD. et al. Bacterial communities in penile skin, male urethra, and vaginas of heterosexual couples with and without bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome 2016; 4: 16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Vodstrcil LA, Walker SM, Hocking JS. et al. Incident bacterial vaginosis (BV) in women who have sex with women is associated with behaviors that suggest sexual transmission of BV. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60: 1042-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J. et al. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis 2006; 193: 1478-1486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Francis SC, Looker C, Vandepitte J. et al. Bacterial vaginosis among women at high risk for HIV in Uganda: high rate of recurrent diagnosis despite treatment. Sex Transm Infect 2016; 92: 142-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vodstrcil LA, Hocking JS, Law M. et al. Hormonal contraception is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bradshaw CS, Sobel JD. Current Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis-Limitations and Need for Innovation. J Infect Dis 2016; 214 (Suppl. 01) S14-S20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Li XD, Wang CC, Zhang XJ. et al. Risk factors for bacterial vaginosis: results from a cross-sectional study having a sample of 53,652 women. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 1525-1532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J. et al. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 267-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bagnall P, Rizzolo D. Bacterial vaginosis: A practical review. JAAPA 2017; 30: 15-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016; 29: 223-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Pepin J, Deslandes S, Giroux G. et al. The complex vaginal flora of West African women with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 2011; 6: e25082
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mendling W. Vaginal Microbiota. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 902: 83-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hoyme UB, Eschenbach DA. [Bacterial vaginitis. Microbiology, diagnosis, therapy and complications]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1985; 110: 349-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lamont RF, Duncan SL, Mandal D. et al. Intravaginal clindamycin to reduce preterm birth in women with abnormal genital tract flora. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 516-522
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Joergensen JS, Kjaer Weile LK, Lamont RF. The early use of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics in susceptible women for the prevention of preterm birth of infectious etiology. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15: 2173-2191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mirmonsef P, Krass L, Landay A. et al. The role of bacterial vaginosis and trichomonas in HIV transmission across the female genital tract. Curr HIV Res 2012; 10: 202-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Atashili J, Poole C, Ndumbe PM. et al. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of published studies. AIDS (London, England) 2008; 22: 1493-1501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wanga V, Mackelprang RD, Thomas KK. et al. Brief Report: Bacterial Vaginosis and Risk of HIV Infection in the Context of CD101 Gene Variation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2020; 85: 584-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Mendling W. Gynäkologische Infektiologie – Diagnostik und Therapie beim Symptom Fluor. Frauenarzt 2018; 59: 65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sustr V, Foessleitner P, Kiss H. et al. Vulvovaginal Candidosis: Current Concepts, Challenges and Perspectives. J Fungi (Basel) 2020; 6: 267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH. et al. The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001–2004. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 1319-1326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Sena AC, Miller WC, Hobbs MM. et al. Trichomonas vaginalis infection in male sexual partners: implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 13-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Petrin D, Delgaty K, Bhatt R. et al. Clinical and microbiological aspects of Trichomonas vaginalis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 300-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA. et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep 2021; 70: 1-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Sherrard J, Wilson J, Donders G. et al. 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union against sexually transmitted infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int J STD AIDS 2018; 29: 1258-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Fischer T, Mortl M, Reif P. et al. Statement by the OEGGG with Review of the Literature on the Mode of Delivery of Premature Infants at the Limit of Viability. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78: 1212-1216
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Sobel JD, Kaur N, Woznicki NA. et al. Prognostic Indicators of Recurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57: e00227-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Gardner HL, Dukes CD. Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1955; 69: 962-976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA. et al. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74: 14-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 297-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Abele-Horn M, Blenk H, Clad A. Genitalinfektionen Teil I in mikrobiologisch-infektiologische Qualitätsstandards (MIQ), MIQ 10. Elsevier Verlag, Urban & Fischer; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Ison CA, Hay PE. Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78: 413-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Swidsinski A, Loening-Baucke V, Mendling W. et al. Infection through structured polymicrobial Gardnerella biofilms (StPM-GB). Histol Histopathol 2014; 29: 567-587
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Hong KH, Hong SK, Cho SI. et al. Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiome by Next-Generation Sequencing and Evaluation of its Performance as a Clinical Diagnostic Tool in Vaginitis. Ann Lab Med 2016; 36: 441-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 van den Munckhof EHA, van Sitter RL, Boers KE. et al. Comparison of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture and two CE-IVD marked quantitative real-time PCRs with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 38: 959-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C. et al. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 819-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Comparison of methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 1266-1271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Spiegel CA, Amsel R, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 170-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Coleman JS, Gaydos CA. Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis: an Update. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56: e00342-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Myziuk L, Romanowski B, Johnson SC. BVBlue test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 1925-1928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Garland SM. et al. Evaluation of a point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 1304-1308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 West B, Morison L, Schim van der Loeff M. et al. Evaluation of a new rapid diagnostic kit (FemExam) for bacterial vaginosis in patients with vaginal discharge syndrome in The Gambia. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30: 483-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Ravel J, Moreno I, Simon C. Bacterial vaginosis and its association with infertility, endometritis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224: 251-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Landlinger C, Oberbauer V, Podpera Tisakova L. et al. Preclinical Data on the Gardnerella-Specific Endolysin PM-477 Indicate Its Potential to Improve the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis through Enhanced Biofilm Removal and Avoidance of Resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022; 66: e0231921 DOI: 10.1128/aac.02319-21.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Weissenbacher ER, Donders G, Unzeitig V. et al. A comparison of dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (Fluomizin(R)) and clindamycin vaginal cream in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2012; 73: 8-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Mendling W, Palmeira-de-Oliveira A, Biber S. et al. An update on the role of Atopobium vaginae in bacterial vaginosis: what to consider when choosing a treatment? A mini review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 300: 1-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Novakov Mikic A, Budakov D. Comparison of local metronidazole and a local antiseptic in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282: 43-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Briese V, Neumann G, Waldschlager J. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a local acting antiseptic agent in the treatment of vaginal dysbiosis during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 585-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Novakov Mikic A, Stojic S. Study results on the use of different therapies for the treatment of vaginitis in hospitalised pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 371-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Swidsinski A, Dorffel Y, Loening-Baucke V. et al. Response of Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm to 5 days of moxifloxacin treatment. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2011; 61: 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Swidsinski A, Loening-Baucke V, Swidsinski S. et al. Clue Cells and Pseudo Clue Cells in Different Morphotypes of Bacterial Vaginosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12: 905739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 McGough SF, MacFadden DR, Hattab MW. et al. Rates of increase of antibiotic resistance and ambient temperature in Europe: a cross-national analysis of 28 countries between 2000 and 2016. Euro Surveill 2020; 25: 1900414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Petricevic L, Witt A. The role of Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 in restoring the normal vaginal flora after antibiotic treatment of bacterial vaginosis. BJOG 2008; 115: 1369-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Coudray MS, Madhivanan P. Bacterial vaginosis-A brief synopsis of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 245: 143-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Gottschick C, Deng ZL, Vital M. et al. Treatment of biofilms in bacterial vaginosis by an amphoteric tenside pessary-clinical study and microbiota analysis. Microbiome 2017; 5: 119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V. et al. An adherent Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm persists on the vaginal epithelium after standard therapy with oral metronidazole. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 97.e1-97.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Gaspar C, Rolo J, Cerca N. et al. Dequalinium Chloride Effectively Disrupts Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Gardnerella spp. Biofilms. Pathogens 2021; 10: 261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Sobel JD, Ferris D, Schwebke J. et al. Suppressive antibacterial therapy with 0.75 % metronidazole vaginal gel to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1283-1289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Brocklehurst PGA, Heatley E, Milan SJ. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (Review). John Wiley & Sons; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Laxmi U, Agrawal S, Raghunandan C. et al. Association of bacterial vaginosis with adverse fetomaternal outcome in women with spontaneous preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 64-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Nelson DB, Hanlon A, Hassan S. et al. Preterm labor and bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria among urban women. J Perinat Med 2009; 37: 130-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Koumans EH, Kendrick JS. CDC Bacterial Vaginosis Working Group. Preventing adverse sequelae of bacterial vaginosis: a public health program and research agenda. Sex Transm Dis 2001; 28: 292-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Berger R, Abele H, Bahlmann F. et al. Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, February 2019) – Part 2 with Recommendations on the Tertiary Prevention of Preterm Birth and the Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79: 813-833
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Boeke AJ, Dekker JH, van Eijk JT. et al. Effect of lactic acid suppositories compared with oral metronidazole and placebo in bacterial vaginosis: a randomised clinical trial. Genitourin Med 1993; 69: 388-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Plummer EL, Bradshaw CS, Doyle M. et al. Lactic acid-containing products for bacterial vaginosis and their impact on the vaginal microbiota: A systematic review. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0246953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Wang ZB, Xin SS, Ding LN. et al. The Potential Role of Probiotics in Controlling Overweight/Obesity and Associated Metabolic Parameters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019; 2019: 3862971
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Li C, Wang T, Li Y. et al. Probiotics for the treatment of women with bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Pharmacol 2019; 864: 172660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Mastromarino P, Vitali B, Mosca L. Bacterial vaginosis: a review on clinical trials with probiotics. New Microbiol 2013; 36: 229-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Strus M, Chmielarczyk A, Kochan P. et al. Studies on the effects of probiotic Lactobacillus mixture given orally on vaginal and rectal colonization and on parameters of vaginal health in women with intermediate vaginal flora. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 163: 210-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 De Alberti D, Russo R, Terruzzi F. et al. Lactobacilli vaginal colonisation after oral consumption of Respecta((R)) complex: a randomised controlled pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 861-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Petersen EE, Genet M, Caserini M. et al. Efficacy of vitamin C vaginal tablets in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial. Arzneimittel-Forschung 2011; 61: 260-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Bojovic T, Bojovic D, Boyer de la Tour FX. et al. First Line Treatment and Relief of Bacterial Vaginosis-related Vaginal Complaints with Metronidazole and Multi-Gyn(R) ActiGel. Eur Obstet Gynecol 2012; 7: 103-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Bradshaw CS, Brotman RM. Making inroads into improving treatment of bacterial vaginosis – striving for long-term cure. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15: 292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Nansel TR, Riggs MA, Yu KF. et al. The association of psychosocial stress and bacterial vaginosis in a longitudinal cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 381-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Gaudoin M, Rekha P, Morris A. et al. Bacterial vaginosis and past chlamydial infection are strongly and independently associated with tubal infertility but do not affect in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 730-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Liversedge NH, Turner A, Horner PJ. et al. The influence of bacterial vaginosis on in-vitro fertilization and embryo implantation during assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2411-2415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Wilson JD, Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ. Rates of bacterial vaginosis in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation for different types of infertility. BJOG 2002; 109: 714-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Campisciano G, Florian F, DʼEustacchio A. et al. Subclinical alteration of the cervical-vaginal microbiome in women with idiopathic infertility. J Cell Physiol 2017; 232: 1681-1688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Wee BA, Thomas M, Sweeney EL. et al. A retrospective pilot study to determine whether the reproductive tract microbiota differs between women with a history of infertility and fertile women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 58: 341-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Haahr T, Humaidan P, Elbaek HO. et al. Vaginal Microbiota and In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes: Development of a Simple Diagnostic Tool to Predict Patients at Risk of a Poor Reproductive Outcome. J Infect Dis 2019; 219: 1809-1817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Park HJ, Kim YS, Yoon TK. et al. Chronic endometritis and infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2016; 43: 185-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Schwebke JR, Desmond RA. A randomized trial of the duration of therapy with metronidazole plus or minus azithromycin for treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 213-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Donders GG, Zodzika J, Rezeberga D. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis: what we have and what we miss. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15: 645-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Cohen CR, Wierzbicki MR, French AL. et al. Randomized Trial of Lactin-V to Prevent Recurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1906-1915
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 OʼLoughlin J, Millwood IY, McDonald HM. et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel): a dose ranging, phase I study. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37: 100-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 McGowan I, Gomez K, Bruder K. et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of the vaginal safety and acceptability of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) in sexually active young women (MTN-004). AIDS (London, England) 2011; 25: 1057-1064
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Ardolino LI, Meloni M, Brugali G. et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Tolerability of a Selective, Bacteriostatic, Locally Active Vaginal Formulation. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2016; 83: 13-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Murina F, Crisan C, Biris M. et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel vaginal medical device in recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a multicenter clinical trial. Minerva Ginecol 2020; 72: 292-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Reichman O, Akins R, Sobel JD. Boric acid addition to suppressive antimicrobial therapy for recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36: 732-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Marrazzo JM, Dombrowski JC, Wierzbicki MR. et al. Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Vaginal Anti-infective, TOL-463, in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Randomized, Single-blind, Phase 2, Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68: 803-809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Plummer EL, Vodstrcil LA, Danielewski JA. et al. Combined oral and topical antimicrobial therapy for male partners of women with bacterial vaginosis: Acceptability, tolerability and impact on the genital microbiota of couples – A pilot study. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0190199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar