Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Patients with Phantom Pain after Amputation of a Lower Limb: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Background

Up to 80% of patients after amputation are affected by phantom limb pain. This may be due to various mechanisms of cortical reorganisation. Non-surgical treatment of the neuropathic phantom limb pain involves mirror therapy. Thereby, the use of a mirror should induce the illusion that the extremity has been preserved. This illusion should initiate processes to restore the original organisation of the somatosensory and motor cortex and thus to reduce pain. Evidence of mirror therapy to treat lower extremity phantom limb pain is rare. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to qualitatively analyse the efficacy of mirror therapy for treatment of phantom limb pain in adult patients after unilateral amputations of the lower extremity.

Method

The databases Medline (PubMed), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Library (Central), and OPENGREY were systematically searched until 26th November 2020, followed by continued searches in these databases to provide a review of updated literature. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation (Risk of Bias Tool [RoB]) of included studies were conducted by two reviewers independently. The primary outcome was pain intensity, and secondary outcomes were pain frequency, pain duration, activities of daily life (ADL), and quality of life. The methodology of this review follows the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Results

The search revealed 234 articles. Four articles were included in the analysis. A reduction in pain intensity due to mirror therapy was reported in all studies, however, in only 2 studies there were significant differences between mirror therapy and the comparison after 4 weeks of treatment (p < 0.001; p < 0.05). This significant difference was maintained after 3 and 6 months follow-up in one of those studies (p < 0.001). The outcomes pain frequency, pain duration, and ADL were decreased after 4 and 10 weeks of mirror therapy compared to comparison, but with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months, there was a significant improvement in the duration of pain and in ADL after mirror therapy compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Differences in the results quality of life between the intervention group and comparison were observed in 2 studies.

Conclusion

Mirror therapy of high frequency and duration is an effective intervention to reduce phantom limb pain in patients after unilateral lower extremity amputation. The superiority of mirror therapy to other interventions cannot be concluded, as the evidence was of low quality.

Keywords

limb - amputation - mirror - intervention - pain

Publication History

Received: 21 December 2022

Accepted after revision: 05 October 2023

Article published online:
15 November 2023

• References

• 1 Flor H. Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2002; 1: 182-189
• 2 Stremmel C, Sittl R, Eder S. [Phantom pain after major amputation--etiology, treatment and prognosis]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2002; 127: 2015-2020
• 3 Schwarzer A, Zenz M, Maier C. [Therapy of phantom limb pain]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2009; 44: 174-180
• 4 Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J. et al. Immediate and long-term phantom limb pain in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-amputation limb pain. Pain 1985; 21: 267-278
• 5 Nikolajsen L, Ilkjaer S, Kroner K. et al. The influence of preamputation pain on postamputation stump and phantom pain. Pain 1997; 72: 393-405
• 6 Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J. et al. Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain 1983; 17: 243-256
• 7 Manchikanti L, Singh V. Managing phantom pain. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 365-375
• 8 Sherman RA, Sherman CJ. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic phantom limb pain among American veterans. Results of a trial survey. Am J Phys Med 1983; 62: 227-238
• 9 Steffen P. [Phantom limb pain]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2006; 41: 378-386
• 10 Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Kortikale Reorganisation. In: Karnath HO, Thier P. Neuropsychologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006.
• 11 Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S. et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995; 375: 482-484
• 12 Polat CS, Konak HE, Altas EU. et al. Factors related to phantom limb pain and its effect on quality of life. Somatosens Mot Res 2021; 38: 322-326
• 13 Christensen J, Ipsen T, Doherty P. et al. Physical and social factors determining quality of life for veterans with lower-limb amputation(s): a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38: 2345-2353
• 14 Schwarzer A, Glaudo S, Zenz M. et al. [Mirror feed-back – a new method for the treatment of neuropathic pain]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2007; 132: 2159-2162
• 15 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: e1-e34
• 16 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Higgins JPT, Green S. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
• 17 Waffenschmidt S, Knelangen M, Sieben W. et al. Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19: 132
• 18 Buchberger B, von Elm E, Gartlehner G. et al. [Assessment of risk of bias in controlled studies]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2014; 57: 1432-1438
• 19 Hartling L, Bond K, Vandermeer B. et al. Applying the risk of bias tool in a systematic review of combination long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17242
• 20 Perry BN, Hussey-Andersen LK, Hughes KE. et al. Mirror therapy as a phantom limb pain treatment for upper-extremity amputees. J Neurol 2013; 260: S19
• 21 Finn SB, Perry BN, Clasing JE. et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mirror Therapy for Upper Extremity Phantom Limb Pain in Male Amputees. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 267
• 22 Ramadugu S, Nagabushnam SC, Katuwal N. et al. Intervention for phantom limb pain: A randomized single crossover study of mirror therapy. Indian J Psychiatry 2017; 59: 457-464
• 23 Ol HS, Van Heng Y, Danielsson L. et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb and stump pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial in landmine amputees in Cambodia. Scand J Pain 2018; 18: 603-610
• 24 Brodie EE, Whyte A, Niven CA. Analgesia through the looking-glass? A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a ‘virtual’ limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 428-436
• 25 Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B, Erbahçeci F, Alkan A. A comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and phantom exercises on phantom limb pain. Turk J Med Sci 2019; 49: 101-109
• 26 Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP. et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2206-2207
• 27 Rothgangel A, Braun S, Winkens B. et al. Traditional and augmented reality mirror therapy for patients with chronic phantom limb pain (PACT study): results of a three-group, multicentre single-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32: 1591-1608
• 28 Tilak M, Isaac SA, Fletcher J. et al. Mirror Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees – A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Physiother Res Int 2016; 21: 109-115
• 29 Bullinger M, Blome C, Sommer R. et al. [Health-related quality of life: a pivotal endpoint in benefit assessment of medical procedures]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2015; 58: 283-290
• 30 Rusticus SA, Lovato C. Impact of sample size and variability on the power and type I error rates of equivalence tests: a simulation study. Pract Assess Res Eval 2014; 19: 11
• 31 Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD. et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 59-67
• 32 Darnall BD. Self-delivered home-based mirror therapy for lower limb phantom pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 78-81
• 33 Campo-Prieto P, Rodriguez-Fuentes G. Effectiveness of mirror therapy in phantom limb pain: a literature review. Neurologia (Engl Ed) 2022; 37: 668-681
• 34 Guemann M, Olie E, Raquin L. et al. Effect of mirror therapy in the treatment of phantom limb pain in amputees: A systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials does not find any evidence of efficacy. Eur J Pain 2022;